Visual evaluation of in vitro cariostatic effect of restorative materials associated with dentifrices

Brazilian Dental Journal

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 112-118

  Rodrigues, José Augusto ^a   Marchi, Giselle Maria ^a   Serra, Mônica Campos ^b   Hara, Anderson Takeo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Composite resin; Dental caries; Diagnosis; Enamel; Glass ionomer cement

Indexed keywords

EID: 28344441842     PISSN: 01036440     EISSN: 01036440     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402005000200005     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Tantbirojn D, Douglas, WH, Versluis, A. Inhibitive effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement on remote enamel artificial caries. Caries Res 1997;31:275-280.
2. Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Papadogiannis Y, Konstantinidis A. Artificial secondary caries around two new F-containing restoratives. Oper Dent 1998;23:81-86.
3. White DJ. Reactivity of fluoride dentifrices with artificial caries. II. Effects on subsurface lesions: F uptake, F distribution, surface hardening and remineralization. Caries Res 1988;22:27-36.
4. Eichmiller FC, Marjenhoff WA. Fluoride-releasing dental restorative materials. Oper Dent 1998;23:218-228.
5. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Koch G. Fluoride release from glass ionomer cement in vitro and in vivo. Swed Dent J 1991;15:253-258.
6. Hattab FN, Mok NYC, Agnew EC. Artificially formed caries like lesions around restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1989;118:193-197.
7. Serra MC, Rodrigues Jr AL. Potencial cariostático de materiais restauradores contendo flúor. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent 1998;52:359-363.
8. Zimmerman BF, Rawls HR, Querens AE. Prevention of in vitro secondary caries with an experimental fluoride-exchanging restorative resin. J Dent Res 1984;63:689-692.
9. Smales RJ, Gao W. In vitro caries inhibition at the enamel margins of glass ionomer restoratives developed for the ART approach. J Dent 2000;28:249-256.
10. Dunne SM, Goolnik JS, Millar BJ, Seddon RP. Caries inhibition by a resin-modified and a conventional glass ionomer cement, in vitro. J Dent 1996;24:91-94.
11. Tam LE, Chan GPL, Yim D In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Oper Dent 1997;22:4-14.
12. Featherstone JDB, O'Really MM, Shariati M, Brugler S. Enhancement of remineralization in vitro and in vivo. In: Factors Relating to Demineralization and Remineralization of the Teeth. Leach SA (Editor). Oxford: IRL, 1986. p. 23-34.
13. Serra MC. Análises sensorial e quantitativa do potencial cariostático de materiais restauradores contendo flúor. [Thesis (Livre Docência)]. Piracicaba: Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Universidade Estadual de Campinas; 1999. 51 p.
14. Edgar WM, Rugg-Gunn AJ, Jenkins GN, Geddes DA. Photographic and direct visual recording of experimental caries-like changes in human dental enamel. Arch Oral Biol 1978;23:667-673.
15. Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnet AJ. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod 1982;81:93-98.
16. Backer-Dirks O. Posteruptive changes in dental enamel. J Dent Res 1966;45:503-511.
17. von der Fehr FR. The effect of fluorides on the caries resistance of enamel. Acta Odontol Scand 1961;19:431-442.
18. Twetman S, McWilliam JS, Hallgren A, Oliveby A. Cariostatic effect of glass ionomer retained orthodontic appliances. Swed Dent J 1997;21:169-175.
19. Glass RL, Shiere FR. A clinical trial of a calcium carbonate base dentifrice containing 0.76% sodium monofluorphosphate. Caries Res 1978;12:284-289.
20. Donly KJ, Kerber L. Demineralization inhibition at glass-ionomer cement and amalgam restoration margins in conjunction with additional fluoride regimens. Spec Care Dent 1999;19:24-28.