Development and comparison of approaches for automated mapping of stream channel networks

Annals of the Association of American Geographers

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 477-490

  Heine, Reuben A ^a   Lant, Christopher L ^a   Sengupta, Raja R ^b  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Digital elevation models; Hydrography; Logistic regression; Stream channel heads; Stream channel mapping

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; MAPPING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STREAM CHANNEL;

EID: 28344434450     PISSN: 00045608     EISSN: 14678306     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.00409.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Arnold, J., B. A. Engel, and R. Srinivasan. 1993. A continuous time, grid cell watershed model. In Application of advanced information technologies for management of natural resources. 17-19 June. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Spokane, WA.
2. Bailey, R. G. 1983. Delineation of ecosystem regions. Environmental Management 7:365-73.
3. Band, L. E. 1986. Topographic partition of watersheds with digital elevation models. Water Resources Research 22 (1): 15-24.
4. Coates, D. R. 1958. Quantitative geomorphology of small drainage basins in southern Indiana. Technical Report 10, Office of Naval Research Project, NR 389-1042, Department of Geology, Columbia University.
5. Chorowicz, J., C. Ichoku, S. Riazanoff, Y. J. Kim, and B. Cervell. 1992. A combined algorithm for automated drainage network extraction. Water Resources Research 28 (5): 1293-302.
6. Dietrich, W. E., C. J. Wilson, D. R. Montgomery, and J. McKean. 1993. Analysis of erosion thresholds, channel networks, and landscape morphology using a digital terrain model. The Journal of Geology 101:259-78.
7. Drummond, R. R. 1974. When is a stream a stream? The Professional Geographer 26:34-37.
8. Dunne, T., and L. B. Leopold. 1978. Water in environmental planning. New York: Freeman.
9. Fairfield, J., and P. Leymarie, 1991. Drainage networks from grid digital elevation models. Water Resources Research 30 (6): 1681-92.
10. Fenneman, N. M., and D. W. Johnson. 1946. Physical divisions of the United States. U.S. Geological Survey map, scale 1:7,000,000.
11. Garbrecht, J., and L. W. Martz. 1997. The assignment of drainage direction over flat surfaces in raster digital elevation models. Journal of Hydrology 193:204-13.
12. Garbrecht, J., and L. W. Martz, 2000. Digital elevation model issues in water resources modeling. In Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling support with geographic information systems, ed. D. D. Maidment, 1-27. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.
13. Gebert, W. A., D. J. Graczyk, and W. R. Krug. 1987. Average annual runoff in the United States, 1951-80, U.S. Geological Survey hydrologic investigations atlas HA-710, 1 sheet, scale 1:2,000,000. Madison, WI: U.S. Geological Survey.
14. Hutchinson, M. F. 1989. A new procedure for gridding elevation and stream data with automatic removal of spurious pits. Journal of Hydrology 106:211-32.
15. Jensen, S. K., and J. O. Dominique. 1988. Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information system analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 54 (11): 1593-600.
16. Lant, C. L., S. E. Kraft, and K. R. Gillman. 1995. Enrollment of filter strips and recharge areas in the CRP and USDA easement programs. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 50:93-200.
17. Maidment, D. R., F. Olivera, A. Calver, A. Eatherral, and W. Fraczek. 1996. Unit hydrograph derived from a spatially distributed velocity field. Hydrological Processes 10 (6): 831-44.
18. Mark, D. M. 1983. Relations between field-surveyed channel networks and map-based geomorphometric measures, Inez, Kentucky. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 73:358-72.
19. Martz, L. W., and J. Garbrecht. 1995. Automated recognition of valley lines and drainage networks from grid elevation models: A review and new method - Comment. Journal of Hydrology 167:393-96.
20. Montgomery, D. R., and W. E. Dietrich. 1989. Source areas, drainage density, and channel initiation. Water Resources Research 25 (8): 1907-18.
21. Montgomery, D. R., and W. E. Dietrich. 1992. Channel initiation and the problem of landscape scale. Science 255:826-30.
22. Montgomery, D. R., and E. Foufoula-Georgiou. 1993. Channel network source representation using digital elevation models. Water Resources Research 29 (12): 3925-34.
23. Morisawa, M. E. 1957. Accuracy of stream lengths from topographic maps. Transactions American Geophysical Union 38:86-88.
24. National Research Council. 2001. Assessing the TMDL approach to water quality management. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
25. Neill, J. T 1974. Soil survey of Chase County, Kansas. U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
26. O'Callaghan, J. F., and D. M. Mark. 1984. The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data. Graphics and Image Processing 28:323-44.
27. Omernik, J. M. 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77:118-25.
28. SAS Institute. 2000. JUMPIN. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press.
29. Swisher, G. 2002. Southern Illinois University Carbondale Patent and Copyright Committee meeting, March 8.
30. Tarboton, D. G. 1997. A new method for the determination of flow directions and contributing areas in grid digital elevation models. Water Resources Research 33 (2): 309-19.
31. Tarboton, D. G., and D. P. Ames. 2001. Advances in the mapping of flow networks from digital elevation data. Proceedings of the World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, Orlando, Florida.
32. Tarboton, D. G., R. L. Bras, and I. Rodrigues-Iturbe. 1991. On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data. Water Resources Research 5 (1): 81-100.
33. Tribe, A. 1991. Automated recognition of valley heads from digital elevation models. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 16:33-49.
34. _. 1992. Automated recognition of valley lines and drainage networks from grid digital elevation models: A review and a new method. Journal of Hydrology 139:263-93.
35. U.S. Geological Survey. 1993. Digital elevation models: Data users guide 5. Reston, VA: Department of the Interior.
36. _. 2003. Digital elevation models: Status graphics for USGS digital elevation products, http://mcmcweb.er.usgs.gov/status/dem_stat.html.
37. Young, R. A., C. A. Onstad, D. D. Bosch, and W. P. Anderson. 1989. AGNPS: A nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agriculture watersheds. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44:168-73.