Historical-institutionalist perspectives on the development of the EU budget system

Journal of European Public Policy

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 113-133

  Ackrill, Robert ^a   Kay, Adrian ^b  

^a NOTTINGHAM TRENT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

EU budget; Granularity; Historical institutionalism; Layering; Path dependency

Indexed keywords

EID: 28244489858     PISSN: 13501763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13501760500380775     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Ackrill, R.W. (2000a) 'The European Union budget, the balanced budget rule and the development of common European policies', Journal of Public Policy 20(1): 1-19.
2. Ackrill, R.W. (2000b) The Common Agricultural Policy, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, for the University Association for Contemporary European Studies.
3. Ackrill, R.W. (2003) 'Stabilisation in EMU - a critical review', in M. Baimbridge and P. Whyman (eds), Fiscal Federalism and European Economic Integration, London: Routledge, pp. 103-18.
4. Buchanan, J.M. and Musgrave, R.A. (1999) Public Finance and Public Choice: Two Contrasting Visions of the State, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Commission of the European Communities (1987) On the Financing of the Community Budget, COM(87)101, Brussels, 28 February 1987.
6. Commission of the European Communities (1989) Community Public Finance: The European Budget after the 1988 Reform, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
7. Commission of the European Communities (2001) Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: Adaptation of the ceiling of own resources and of the ceiling for appropriations for commitments following the entry into force of Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom. COM(2001)801 final, Brussels, 28 December 2001.
8. Dimitrikapoulos, D.G. (2001) 'Unintended consequences: institutional autonomy and executive discretion in the European Union', Journal of Public Policy 21(2): 107-31.
9. European Parliament, Council, Commission (1999) Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure. 1999/C 172/01. Official Journal of the European Communities C172, 18 June 1999, pp. 1-22.
10. Hay, C. and Wincott, D. (1998) 'Structure, agency and historical institutionalism', Political Studies 46(5): 951-7.
11. Holzinger, K. and Knill, C. (2002) 'Path dependencies in European integration: a constructive response to German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer', Public Administration 80(1): 125-52.
12. Kay, A. (1998) The Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy: The Case of the MacSharry Reforms, Wallingford: CAB International.
13. Kay, A. (2003) 'Path dependency and the CAP', Journal of European Public Policy 10(3): 405-20.
14. Laffan, B. (1997) 'From policy entrepreneur to policy manager: the challenge facing the European Commission', Journal of European Public Policy 4(3): 422-38.
15. Laffan, B. (2000) 'The big budgetary bargains: from negotiation to authority', Journal of European Public Policy 7(5): 725-43.
16. Laffan, B. and Shackleton, M. (2000) 'The budget: who gets what, when and how', in H. Wallace and W. Wallace (eds), Policy-Making in the European Union, 4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 211-41.
17. Lindner, J. (2003) 'Institutional stability and change: two sides of the same coin', Journal of European Public Policy 10(6): 912-35.
18. Lindner, J. and Rittberger, B. (2003) 'The creation, interpretation and contestation of institutions - revisiting historical institutionalism', Journal of Common Market Studies 41(3): 445-73.
19. Mahoney, J. (2001) The Legacies of Liberalism: Path Dependence and Political Regimes in Central America, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
20. Monar, J. (1994) 'Interinstitutional agreements: the phenomenon and its new dynamics after Maastricht', Common Market Law Review 31(4): 693-719.
21. Moyer, H.W. and Josling, T.E. (1990) Agricultural Policy Reform: Politics and Process in the EC and USA, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
22. North, D.C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Ostrom, E. (1999) 'Institutional rational choice: an assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework', in P. Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 35-72.
24. Pierson, P. (2000) 'Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of polities', American Political Science Review 94(2): 251-67.
25. Pierson, P. (2004) Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Stacey, J. and Rittberger, B. (2003) 'Dynamics of formal and informal institutional change in the EU', Journal of European Public Policy 10(6): 858-83.
27. Strasser, D. (1981) The Finances of Europe, 2nd edn, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
28. Strasser, D. (1992) The Finances of Europe, 7th edn (3rd English edn), Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
29. Streeck, W. and Thelen, K. (2005) 'Introduction', in W. Streeck and K. Thelen (eds), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-39.
30. Thelen, K. (2003) 'How institutions evolve', in J. Mahoney and D. Rueschmeyer (eds), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 208-41.