The evolution of municipal waste management in Europe: How different are national regimes?

Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 303-317

  Buclet, Nicolas ^a   Godard, Olivier ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE TROYES   (France)

^b Laboratoire d'Econométrie   (France)

Author keywords

Economic instruments; Environmental policies; European harmonization; Evolutionary theory; Public policies; Waste management

Indexed keywords

EID: 28244479391     PISSN: 1523908X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jepp.91     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Argus, with ACR, Carl Bro. 2001. European Packaging Waste Management Systems. Report for the European Commission DG XI.E.3, February.
2. Bertolini G. 1994. Economies sur l'incinération d'ordures ménagères résultant d'une réduction à la source ou de collectes sélectives (notamment de 'fractions sèches' et en particulier d'emballages). Techniques Sciences Méthodes 89.
3. Buclet N, Godard O. 1997. L'émergence négociée d'une norme économique commune au sein des institutions européennes: la directive communautaire sur les emballages et les déchets d'emballages. Politiques et Management Public 15(2): 73-95.
4. Buclet N, Godard O (eds). 2000. Municipal Waste Management in Europe. A Comparative Study in Building Regimes. Kluwer Academic Press: Dordrecht.
5. Coopers & Lybrand. 1995. Impact économique des mesures prises en faveur de la valorisation des déchets d'emballages. Rapport pour le Ministère de l'Industrie, Paris.
6. Defeuilley C, Quirion P. 1995. Les déchets d'emballages ménagers: une analyse économique des politiques française et allemande. Economie et Statistique 290: 69-79.
7. Defeuilley C, Lupton S, Serret Y. 1997. The French Household Waste Regime. Report for European Commission DG XII. CIRED: Paris.
8. Denby-Wilkes V. 1996. Politique nationale: sa traduction en termes d'équipements et d'investissements. Paper presented to conférence 'La gestion des déchets municipaux: comment mieux gérer au moindre coût', Paris, 26 June.
9. Dente B (ed.). 1995. Environmental Policy in Search of New Instruments. Kluwer Academic Press: Dordrecht.
10. Department of the Environment. 1992. Economic Instruments and Recovery of Resources from Waste. HMSO: London.
11. DSD (Duales System Deutschland). 1995. Packaging Recycling Worldwide. Cologne: Duales System Deutschland.
12. Godard O, Beaumais O. 1994. Économie, croissance et environnement: de nouvelles stratégies pour de nouvelles relations. Revue Economique 44: 143-176.
13. Godard O. 1999. Dialogue and economic efficiency: two antagonistic goals for environmental policy-making? Lessons from the French packaging-waste management system. In Market-based Instruments for Environmental Management. Politics and Institutions, Andersen MS, Sprenger R-U (eds). Edward Elgar: Cheltenham; 89-110.
14. Leppänen A. 1994. The experience of the Scandinavian countries. 3rd European Congress on Packaging and Environment, Brussels.
15. Neumann F. 1997. Municipal waste management in the Netherlands. Report for European Commission DG XII. Rotterdam: ERASMUS.
16. Turner R, Pearce D. 1993. Market-based approaches to solid waste management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 8: 63-90.
17. Turner R, Pearce D. 1994. The role of economic instruments in solid waste management policy. In Economic Incentives and Environmental Policies. Principle and Practice, Opschoor J, Turner R (eds). Kluwer: Dordrecht; 251-273.
18. Weizsäcker E von, Lovins AB, Lovins LH. 1997. Factor Four. Doubling Wealth - Halving Resource Use. Earthscan: London.
19. Whiston T, Glachant M. 1996. Voluntary agreements between industry and government: the case of recycling regulations. In Environmental Policy in Europe. Industry, Competition and the Policy Process, Lévêque F (ed.). Edward Elgar: Cheltenham; 143-174.