Patients' tolerance and early complications of transrectal sonographically guided prostate biopsy: Prospective study of 300 patients

Journal of Clinical Ultrasound

Volumn 33, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 452-456

  Sheikh, Mehraj ^a   Hussein, Ali Y T ^a   Kehinde, Elijah O ^a   Al Saeed, Osama ^b   Rad, Am B ^a   Ali, Yusuf M ^a   Anim, Jehoram T ^a  

^a KUWAIT UNIVERSITY   (Kuwait)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Complications; Patient tolerance; Prostate biopsy; Transrectal sonography

Indexed keywords

CIPROFLOXACIN; PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS; ARTICLE; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; DYSURIA; FEVER; HEMATURIA; HEMOSPERMIA; HUMAN; INFECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTPATIENT CARE; PAIN; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; RECTUM HEMORRHAGE; SEPTICEMIA; SYNCOPE; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANESTHESIA, LOCAL; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; HEMATURIA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RECTUM; SEPSIS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 28244466313     PISSN: 00912751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jcu.20168     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Djavan B, Remzi M, Ghawidel K, et al. Diagnosis of prostate cancer: the clinical use of transrectal ultrasound and biopsy. EAU Update Series 2003;1:9.
2. Berger AP, Gozzi C, Steiner H, et al. Complication rate of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a comparison among 3 protocols with 6, 10 and 15 cores. J Urol 2004;171:1478.
3. Paul R, Scholer S, Randenborgh HV, et al. Morbidity of prostatic biopsy for different biopsy strategies: is there a relation to core number and sampling region? Eur Urol 2004;45:450.
4. Haq A, Patel HRH, Habib MR, et al. Diclofenac suppository analgesia for transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies of the prostate: a double blind, randomized controlled trial. J Urol 2004;171:1489.
5. Crundwell MC, Cooke PW, Wallace DM. Patients' tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsy: an audit of 104 cases. BJU Int 1999;83:792.
6. Edson RS, Van Scoy RE, Leary FJ. Gram negative bacteremia after transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate. Mayo Clin Proc 1980;55:489.
7. Borer A, Gilad J, Sikuler E, et al. Fatal Clostridium sordellii ischio-rectal abscess with septicaemia complicating ultrasound-guided transrectal prostate biopsy. J Infect 1999;38:128.
8. Irani J, Fournier F, Bon D, et al. Patient tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate. Br J Urol 1997;79:608.
9. Desgrandchamps F, Maria P, Irani J, et al. The rectal administration of lidocaine gel and tolerance of transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy of the prostate: a prospective randomized placebo-controlled study. BJU (Inter) 1999;83:1007.
10. Peters JL, Thompson AC, McNicholas TA, et al. Increased patient satisfaction from transrectal ultrasonography and biopsy under sedation. BJU Int 2001;87:827.
11. Masood J, Shah N, Lane T, et al. Nitrous oxide (Entonox) inhalation and tolerance of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a double blind randomized controlled study. J Urol 2002;168 (Suppl):116.
12. Soloway MS, Obek C. Periprostatic local anesthesia before ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 2000;163:172.
13. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, et al. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 1989;142:71.
14. Elabbady AA. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a prospective study of patients' tolerance and complications. African J Urol 2001;7:57.
15. Rietbergen JB, Kruger AE, Kranse R, et al. Complications of transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic sextant biopsies of the prostate: evaluation of complication rates and risk factors within a population-based screening program. Urology 1997;49:875.
16. Rodriguez LV, Terris MK. Risks and complications of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy: a prospective study and review of the literature. J Urol 1998;160:2115.
17. Enlund AL, Varenhorst E. Morbidity of ultrasound-guided transrectal core biopsy of the prostate without prophylactic antibiotic therapy. A prospective study in 415 cases. Br J Urol 1997;79:777.
18. Clements R, Aideyan OU, Griffiths GJ, et al. Side effects and patient acceptability of transrectal biopsy of the prostate. Clin Radiol 1993;47:125.
19. Aus G, Hermansson CG, Hugosson J, et al. Transrectal ultrasound examination of the prostate: complications and acceptance by patients. Br J Urol 1993;71:457.
20. Vallancien G, Prapotnich D, Veillon B, et al. Systematic prostatic biopsies in 100 men with no suspicion of cancer on digital rectal examination. J Urol 1991;146:1308.
21. Webb JA, Shanmuganathan K, McLean A. Complications of ultrasound guided transperineal prostate biopsy. A prospective study. Br J Urol 1993;72:775.
22. Collins GN, Lloyd SN, Hehir M, et al. Multiple transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsies true morbidity and patient acceptance. Br J Urol 1993;71:460.
23. Melekos MD. Efficacy of prophylactic antimicrobial regimens in preventing infectious complications after transrectal biopsy of the prostate. Int Urol Nephrol 1990;22:257.
24. Roach MB, Figueroa TE, McBride D, et al. Ciprofloxacin versus gentamycin in prophylaxis against bacteremia in transrectal prostate needle biopsy. Urology 1991;38:84.
25. Sieber PR, Rommel FM, Agusta VE, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in ultrasound guided transrectal prostate biopsy. J Urol 1997;157:2199.
26. Kehinde EO, Sheikh M, Mojimoniyi OA, et al. High serum prostate-specific antigen levels in the absence of prostate cancer in Middle Eastern men: the clinician's dilemma. BJU Int 2003;91:618.
27. Brossner C, Madersbacher S, Bayer G, et al. Comparative study of two different TRUS-guided sextant biopsy techniques in detecting prostate cancer in one biopsy session. Eur Urol 2000;37:65.
28. Antunes AA, Calado AA, Leina MC, et al. Efficacy of intrarectal lidocaine hydorochloride gel for pain control in patients undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy. Int Braz J Urol 2004;30:380.