Are we misconstruing children or scientists?;

Human Development

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 51-54

  Spencer, Janine ^a   Karmiloff Smith, Annette ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attribution theory; Culture; Development; Representational redescription; Theory of mind

Indexed keywords

EID: 28244464919     PISSN: 0018716X     EISSN: 14230054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000278549     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Elman JL., Bates B., Johnson MU., Karmiloff-Smith A., Parisi D & Plunkett K (in press). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development., Cambridge., MA: MIT Press.
2. Gopnik A & Wellman MM (1992). Why the child's theory of mind really is a theory., Mind and Language, 7, 145-171.
3. Heider F (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations., New York: Wiley.
4. Karmiloff-Smith A (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science., Cambridge., MA: MIT/Bradford Books.
5. Putnam H (1975). The meaning of “meaning"., In Mind, language and reality., New York., Cambridge University Press.
6. Tolchinsky-Landsmann L & Karmiloff-Smith A (1992). Children's understanding of notations as domains of knowledge versus referential-communicative tools., Cognitive Development, 7, 287-3