The agricultural negotiations in the WTO: The same old story?

Journal of Common Market Studies

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 913-925

  Landau, Alice ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28244440977     PISSN: 00219886     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-5965.00337     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Anderson, K., Ingco, E. and Ingco, M. (1999) 'Integrating Agriculture Into The WTO: The Next Phase'. WTO/World Bank Conference on Developing Countries in a Millennium Round, WTO Secretariat, Geneva, 20-21 September.
2. Commission of the European Communities (1997) Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 2078/9. COM(97) 620 final.
3. Commission of the European Communities (1998) Contributions of the European Community on the Multifunctional Character of Agriculture, 28 September.
4. Commission of the European Communities (1999) Directions Towards Sustainable Agriculture, COM (1999) 22 final.
5. Commission of the European Communities (2000) 'Agriculture's Contribution to Environmentally and Culturally Non-Trade Concerns'. Paper presented to the Conference on Non-trade Concerns in Agriculture, Discussion Paper No. 4, Norway, 2-4 July.
6. Croome, J. (1998) The Present Outlook for Trade Negotiations in the World Trade Organization at «http://www.wto.org».
7. Jönsson, C. (1990) Communication in International Bargaining (London: Pinter).
8. Josling, T. and Tangermann, S. (1999) 'The Interests of Developing Countries in the Next Round of WTO Agricultural Negotiations'.UNCTAD, Paper presented to the workshop on Developing a Proactive and Coherent Trade Agenda. Pretoria, 29 June-2 July.
9. Landau, A. (1998) 'Bargaining over Power and Policy: The CAP Reform and Agricultural Negotiations in the Uruguay Round'. Journal of International Negotiation, Vol. 3, pp. 453-79.
10. Landau, A. (2000) 'Analyzing International Economic Negotiations: Towards a Synthesis of Approaches'. Journal of International Negotiation, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 1-19.
11. Lowi, P. and Baldock, D. (2000) CAP Regime and the European Countryside: Prospects for Integration between Agricultural, Regional and Environmental Policies (Allingford: CABI).
12. Skogstad, G. (1998) 'Ideas, Paradigms and Institutions: Agricultural Exceptionalism in the European Union and the United States'. Governance, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 463-90.
13. Swinbank, A. and Tanner, C. (1996) Farm Policy and Trade Conflict: The Uruguay Round and CAP Reform (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).
14. USDA (2000) The Use and Abuse of Multifunctionality. Economic Research Service, USDA at «http//:www.ers.usda.gov».
15. Zartman, W. (1986) 'The Importance of North-South Negotiations'. In Zartman, W. (ed.) Positive Sum, Improving North-South Negotiations (New Brunswick: Transaction Books), pp. 278-30.