Performance of peer-to-peer networks: Service capacity and role of resource sharing policies

Performance Evaluation

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 175-194

  Yang, Xiangying ^a   De Veciana, Gustavo ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

Fairness; File sharing; Incentive; Peer to peer; Service capacity

Indexed keywords

FAIRNESS; FILE SHARING; INCENTIVE; PEER-TO-PEER; SERVICE CAPACITY;

DATA PROCESSING; FILE ORGANIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;

TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS;

EID: 28244439833     PISSN: 01665316     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.peva.2005.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. S. Rhea et al., Maintenance-free global data storage, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Internet Computing, September-October 2001, pp. 40-49.
2. S. Graupner, W. Kalfa, C. Reimann, Modeling and simulation of media-on-demand services - evaluating a digital media grid architecture, Technical Report No. HPL-2002-192, HP Laboratories, 2002.
3. B. Cohen Incentives build robustness in BitTorrent Proceedings of the Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems 2003
4. M. Ripeanu, I. Foster, and A. Iamnitchi Mapping the Gnutella network: properties of large-scale peer-to-peer systems and implications for system design IEEE Internet Comput 6 1 2002 50 57
5. M. Ripeanu Peer-to-peer architecture case study: Gnutella network Proceedings of the First International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing 2001 99 100
6. S. Saroiu, P. Gummadi, and S. Gribble A measurement study of peer-to-peer file sharing systems Proceedings of the Multimedia Computing and Networking San Jose, January 2002
7. T.S. Eugene Ng, et al., Measurement-based optimization techniques for bandwidth-demanding peer-to-peer systems, in: Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM'03, San Francisco, April 2003.
8. J. Ritter, Why Gnutella can't scale. No, really, 2001. http://www.tch.org/gnutella.html.
9. Z. Ge, et al., Modeling peer-peer file sharing systems, in: Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, San Francisco, April 2003.
10. K. Lai, et al., Incentives for cooperation in peer-to-peer networks, in: Proceedings of the Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, 2003.
11. K. Anagnostakis, and M. Greenwald Exchange-based incentive mechanisms for peer-to-peer file sharing Proceedings of the 24th IEEE International Conference of Distributed Computing (ICDCS) March 2004
12. A. Habib, J. Chuang, Service differentiated peer selection: an incentive mechanism for peer-to-peer media streaming, Technical Report No. TR-2004-2-HC, UC Berkeley, February 2004.
13. R. Ma, S. Lee, J. Lui, and D. Yau A game theoretic approach to provide incentive and service differentiation in P2P networks Proceedings of the ACE SIGMETRICS/Performance Evaluation Review, vol. 32 2004
14. J. Mundinger, R. Weber, Efficient file dissemination using peer-to-peer technology, Private communication.
15. K.B. Athreya, and P.E. Ney Branching Processes 1972 Springer New York
16. X. Yang, and G. de Veciana Service capacity of peer-to-peer networks Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM March 2004
17. http://bitconjurer.org/BitTorrent/
18. A.M.F.P. Kelly, and D. Tan Rate control in communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability J. Oper. Res. Soc. 49 1998 237 252
19. D. Bertsekas, and J. Tsitsiklis Parallel and Distributed Computation: Numerical Methods 1997 Athena Scientific Belmont, MA