Broad outcome measures may underestimate effectiveness: An instrument comparison study

Child and Adolescent Mental Health

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 143-144

  Lee, William ^a   Jones, Lynne ^b   Goodman, Robert ^c   Heyman, Isobel ^c  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b GREAT ORMOND STREET HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Obsessive Compulsive Disorder; Outcome; Questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD HEALTH CARE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CENTER; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE DISORDER; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE;

EID: 28244439827     PISSN: 1475357X     EISSN: 14753588     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-3588.2005.00350.x     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Berg, C., Rapoport, J., & Flament, M. (1986). The Leyton Obsessional Inventory-Child Version. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 25, 84-91.
2. DOH (1998). A first class service: Quality in the new NHS. London: Department of Health.
3. Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337-1345.
4. Scally, G., & Donaldson, L.J. (1998). The NHS's 50 anniversary. Clinical governance and the drive for quality improvement in the new NHS in England. British Medical Journal, 317, 61-65.