Histological grading in gastric cancer by Ming classification: Correlation with histopathological subtypes, metastasis, and prognosis

World Journal of Surgery

Volumn 29, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1422-1427

  Luebke, Thomas ^a   Baldus, Stephan E ^a   Grass, Guido ^a   Bollschweiler, Elfriede ^a   Thiele, Jürgen ^a   Dienes, Hans Peter ^a   Hoelscher, Arnulf H ^a   Moenig, Stefan P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER GRADING; CANCER GROWTH; CANCER INFILTRATION; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER SURVIVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; GASTRECTOMY; HISTOLOGY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METASTASIS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PROGNOSIS; STOMACH CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL RATE; TUMOR DIFFERENTIATION; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; GASTRECTOMY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STOMACH NEOPLASMS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 28244433826     PISSN: 03642313     EISSN: 14322323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-005-7795-z     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ming SC. Gastric carcinoma: a pathobiological classification. Cancer 1977;39:2475-2485.
2. Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Noffsinger AE, Belli J, et al. Pathologic and phenotypic features of gastric cancer. Semin Oncol 1996;23:292-306.
3. Flucke U, Monig SP, Baldus SE, et al. Differences between biopsy- or specimen-related Lauren and World Health Organization classification in gastric cancer. World J Surg 2002;26:137-140.
4. Lauren PA, Nevalainen TJ. Epidemiology of intestinal and diffuse types of gastric carcinoma. A time-trend study in Finland with comparison between studies from high- and low-risk areas. Cancer 1993;71:2926-2933.
5. Watanabe A, Oshiro T, Oiwa H, et al. Prognosis of patients with gastric cancer and pyloric stenosis: histological differentiation. Semin Surg Oncol 1994;10:121-124.
6. Watanabe H, Nishimaki T. Factors affecting the growth and extension of gastric cancer - analysis of retrospective observation. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 1983;10:482-488.
7. Goseki N, Takizawa T, Koike M. Differences in the mode of the extension of gastric cancer classified by histological type: new histological classification of gastric carcinoma. Gut 1992;33:606-612.
8. Monig S, Baldus SE, Collet PH, et al. Histological grading in gastric cancer by Goseki classification: correlation with histopathological subtypes and prognosis. Anticancer Res 2001;21:617-620.
9. You WC, Blot WJ, Chang YS, et al. Diet and high risk of stomach cancer in Shandong, China. Cancer Res 1988;48:3518-3523.
10. Brinton LA, Gridley G, Hrubec Z, et al. Cancer risk following pernicious anaemia. Br J Cancer 1989;59:810-813.
11. Mullaney PJ, Wadley MS, Hyde C, et al. Appraisal of compliance with the UICC/AJCC staging system in the staging of gastric cancer. Union International Contra la Cancrum/American Joint Committee on Cancer. Br J Surg 2002;89:1405-1408.
12. Bollschweiler E. Benefits and limitations of Kaplan-Meier calculations of survival chance in cancer surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2003;388:239-244.
13. Ming SC. Cellular and molecular pathology of gastric carcinoma and precursor lesions: a critical review. Gastric Cancer 1998;1:31-50.
14. Jass JR, Sobin LH, Watanabe H. The World Health Organization's histologic classification of gastrointestinal tumors. A commentary on the second edition, Cancer 1990;66:2162-2167.
15. Mulligan RM. Histogenesis and biologic behavior of gastric carcinoma. Pathol Annu 1972;7:349-415.
16. Filipe MI, Jankowski J. Growth factors and oncogenes in Barrett's oesophagus and gastric metaplasia. Endoscopy 1993;25:637-641.
17. Hermanek P. Tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and the pancreas: histopathology, staging and prognosis. Anticancer Res 1999;19:2393-2396.
18. Songun I, van de Velde CJ, Arends JW, et al. Classification of gastric carcinoma using the Goseki system provides prognostic information additional to TNM staging. Cancer 1999;85:2114-2118.
19. Monig SP, Zirbes TK, Schroder W, et al. Staging of gastric cancer: correlation of lymph node size and metastatic infiltration. A.J.R. Am J Roentgenol 1999;173:365-367.
20. Dixon MF, Martin IG, Sue-Ling HM, et al. Goseki grading in gastric cancer: comparison with existing systems of grading and its reproducibility. Histopathology 1994;25:309-316.
21. Piard F, Hillon P, Levillain P, et al. Does Ming's classification of gastric carcinomas have epidemiologic or prognostic value? Ann Pathol 1986;6:329-334.
22. Davessar K, Pezzullo JC, Kessimian N, et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma: prognostic significance of several pathologic parameters and histologic classifications. Hum Pathol 1990;21:325-332.
23. Ribeiro MM, Sarmento JA, Sobrinho Simoes MA, et al. Prognostic significance of Lauren and Ming classifications and other pathologic parameters in gastric carcinoma. Cancer 1981;47:780-784.
24. Garnier P, Vielh P, Asselain B, et al. Prognostic value of the Lauren and Ming classifications in gastric adenocarcinoma. Multidimensional analysis. Gastroenterol. Clin Biol 1988;12:553-558.
25. Cimerman M, Repse S, Jelenc F, et al. Comparison of Lauren's, Ming's and WHO histological classifications of gastric cancer as a prognostic factor for operated patients. Int Surg 1994;79:27-32.
26. Dirschmid K, Scheiden R, Zimmermann G, et al. Tubular differentiated stomach carcinoma of the (Ming) infiltrating type. Pathologe 1996;17:122-126.