Symptom association analysis in ambulatory gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring

Gut

Volumn 54, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1810-1817

  Bredenoord, A J ^a   Weusten, B L A M ^a   Smout, A J P M ^b  

^a ST ANTONIUS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACID;

CLINICAL FEATURE; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; ESOPHAGUS PH; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HUMAN; PH; PH MEASUREMENT; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

CHEST PAIN; COUGH; GASTRIC ACIDITY DETERMINATION; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HEARTBURN; HUMANS; MONITORING, AMBULATORY;

EID: 28144454058     PISSN: 00175749     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/gut.2005.072629     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Spencer J. Prolonged pH recording in the study of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Br J Surg 1969;56:912-14.
2. Falor WH, Chang B, White HA, et al. Twenty-four hour esophageal pH monitoring by telemetry. Cost-effective use in outpatients. Am J Surg 1981;142:514-16.
3. Johnson LF, DeMeester TR. Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 1974;62:325-32.
4. Wiener GJ, Morgan TM, Copper JB, et al. Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Reproducibility and variability of pH parameters. Dig Dis Sci 1988;33:1127-33.
5. Franzén T, Tibbling Grahn L. Reliability of 24-hour oesophageal pH monitoring under standardized conditions. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002;37:6-8.
6. Johnsson F, Joelsson B. Reproducibility of ambulatory oesophageal pH monitoring. Gut 1988;29:886-9.
7. Wang H, Beck IT, Paterson WG. Reproducibility and physiological characteristics of 24-hour ambulatory esophageal manometry/pH-metry. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:492-7.
8. de Caestecker JS. Twenty-four-hour oesophageal pH monitoring: advances and controversies. Neth J Med 1989;34(suppl):S20-39.
9. Johnson LF, DeMeester TR. Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 1974;62:325-32.
10. Johnsson F, Joelsson B, Isberg PE. Ambulatory 24 hour intraesophageal pH-momtoring in the diagnosis or gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gut 1987;28:1145-50.
11. Gignoux C, Bonnet-Eymard PO, Hostein J, et al. Enregistrement ambulatoire du pH oesophagien pendant 24 heures dans une population de 27 témoins: analyse des facteurs techniques et methodologiques influençant les resultats. Gastroenlerol Clin Biol 1987;11:17-23.
12. Smout AJ, Breedijk M, van der Zouw C, et al. Physiological gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal motor activity studied with a new system for 24-hour recording and automated analysis. Dig Dis Sci 1989;34:372-8.
13. Rokkas T, Sladen GE. Ambulatory esophageal pH recording in gastroesophageal reflux: relevance to the development of esophagitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1988;83:629-32.
14. Howard PJ, Maher L, Pryde A, et al. Symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux, abnormal oesophageal acid exposure, and mucosal acid sensitivity are three separate, though related, aspects of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gut 1991;32:128-32.
15. Klauser AG, Schindlbeck NE, Muller-Lissner SA. Symptoms in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Lancet 1990;335:205-8.
16. Io Kahrilas PJ, Quigley EM. Clinical esophageal pH recording: a technical review for practice guideline development. Gastroenterology 1996;110:1982-96.
17. Howard PJ, Pryde A, Heading RC. Relationship between gastroesophageal reflux and symptoms in patients referred for ambulatory pH monitoring. J Gastrointest Motil 1990;2:231-9.
18. Weusten BL, Smout AJ. Analysis of 24-h oesophageal pH and pressure recordings. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1995;7:1147-51.
19. Behar J, Biancani P, Sheahan DG. Evaluation of esophageal tests in the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis. Gastroenterology 1976;71:9-15.
20. Ghillebert G, Demeyere AM, Janssens J, et al. How well can quantitative 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring distinguish various degrees of reflux disease? Dig Dis Sci 1995;40:1317-24.
21. Weusten BL, Smout AJ. Ambulatory monitoring of esophageal pH and pressure. In: Castell DO, Richter JE, eds. The esophagus. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2003:135-50.
22. Colas-Atger E, Bonaz B, Papillon E, et al. Relationship between acid reflux episodes and gastroesophageal reflux symptoms is very inconstant. Dig Dis Sci 2002;47:645-51.
23. Dent J, Holloway RH, Toouli J, et al. Mechanisms of lower oesophageal sphincter incompetence in patients with symptomatic gastrooesophageal reflux. Gut 1988;29:1020-8.
24. Wyman JB, Dent J, Holloway RH. Changes in oesophageal pH associated with gastro-oesophageal reflux. Are traditional criteria sensitive for detection of reflux? Scand J Gastroenterol 1993;28:827-32.
25. Metman EH, Lefrou L, Barbieux JP, et al. Symptom analysis of 24-hour esophageal pH data: comparison of different software methods of calculation. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2004;16:866.
26. Lam HG, Breumelhof R, Roelofs JM, et al. What is the optimal time window in symptom analysis of 24-hour esophageal pressure and pH data? Dig Dis Sci 1994;39:402-9.
27. Ward BW, Wu WC, Richter JE, et al. Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Technology searching for a clinical application. J Clin Gastroenterol 1986;8(suppl 1):59-67.
28. Wiener GJ, Richter JE, Copper JB, et al. The symptom index: a clinically important parameter of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol 1988;83:358-61.
29. Singh S, Richter JE, Bradley LA, et al. The symptom index. Differential usefulness in suspected acid-related complaints of heartburn and chest pain. Dig Dis Sci 1993;38:1402-8.
30. Breumelhof R, Smout AJ. The symptom sensitivity index: a valuable additional parameter in 24-hour esophageal pH recording. Am J Gastroenterol 1991;86:160-4.
31. Ghillebert G, Janssens J, Vantrappen G, et al. Ambulatory 24 hour intraoesophageal pH and pressure recordings v provocation tests in the diagnosis of chest pain of oesophageal origin. Gut 1990;31:738-44.
32. Breumelhof R, Nadorp JH, Akkermans LM, et al. Analysis of 24-hour esophageal pressure and pH data in unselected patients with noncardiac chest pain. Gastroenterology 1990;99:1257-64.
33. Weusten BL, Roelofs JM, Akkermans LM, et al. The symptom-association probability: an improved method for symptom analysis of 24-hour esophageal pH data. Gastroenterology 1994;107:1741-5.
34. Armstrong D, Emde C, Inauen W, et al. Diagnostic assessment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: what is possible vs. what is practical? Hepatogastroenterology 1992;39(suppl 1):3-13.
35. Steinbach J, Fass R, Mittal RK. Assessment of relationship between acid reflux and heartburn using receiver operating characteristic curves. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2002;31:S45-58.
36. Bernstein LM, Baker LA. A clinical test for esophagitis. Gastroenterology 1957;34:760-81.
37. Richter JE, Hewson EG, Sinclair JW, et al. Acid perfusion test and 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring with symptom index. Comparison of tests for esophageal acid sensitivity. Dig Dis Sci 1991;36:565-71.
38. Ghillebert G, Janssens J. Provocation tests versus 24-h pH and pressure measurements. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1995;7:1141-6.
39. Jung B, Steinbach J, Beaumont C, et al. Lack of association between esophageal acid sensitivity detected by prolonged pH monitoring and Bernstein testing. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:410-15.
40. Hewson EG, Dalton CB, Richter JE. Comparison of esophageal manometry, provocative testing, and ambulatory monitoring in patients with unexplained chest pain. Dig Dis Sci 1990;35:302-9.
41. Shi G, Bruley d V, Scarpignato C, et al. Reflux related symptoms in patients with normal oesophageal exposure to acid. Gut 1995;37:457-64.
42. Trimble KC, Pryde A, Heading RC. Lowered oesophageal sensory thresholds in patients with symptomatic but not excess gastro-oesophageal reflux: evidence for a spectrum of visceral sensitivity in GORD. Gut 1995;37:7-12.
43. Clouse RE, Richter JE, Heading RC, et al. Functional esophageal disorders. Gut 1999;45(suppl 2):II31-6.
44. Talley NJ, Stanghellini V, Heading RC, et al. Functional gastroduodenal disorders. Gut 1999;45(suppl 2):II37-42.
45. Watson RG, Tham TC, Johnston BT, et al. Double blind cross-over placebo controlled study of omeprazole in the treatment of patients with reflux symptoms and physiological levels of acid reflux-the "sensitive oesophagus". Gut 1997;40:587-90.
46. Taghavi SA, Ghasedi M, Saberi-Firoozi M, et al. Symptom association probability and symptom sensitivity index: preferable but still suboptimal predictors of response to high dose omeprazole. Gut 2005;54:1067-71.
47. Diaz S, Aymerich R, Clouse RE, et al. The symptom association probability (SAP) is superior to the symptom index (SI) for attributing symptoms to gastroesophageal reflux: validation using outcome from laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS). Gastroenterology 2002;122:A75.
48. Boudesteijn EA, Bais JE, Bosscha K, et al. Nissen fundoplication in "reflux-negative" gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 2002;118:A1218.
49. Wunderlich AW, Murray JA. Temporal correlation between chronic cough and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dig Dis Sci 2003;48:1050-6.
50. Lam HG, Breumelhof R, Berge Henegouwen GP, et al. Temporal relationships between episodes of non-cardiac chest pain and abnormal oesophageal function. Gut 1994;35:733-6.
51. Smout AJ, Lam HG, Breumelhof R. Ambulatory esophageal monitoring in noncardiac chest pain. Am J Med 1992;92:74-80S.
52. Ward BW, Wu WC, Richter JE, et al. Long-term follow-up of symptomatic status of patients with noncardiac chest pain: is diagnosis of esophageal etiology helpful? Am J Gastroenterol 1987;82:215-18.
53. Payne WW, Poulton EP. Experiments on visceral sensation: The relation of pain to activity in the human oesophagus. J Physiol 1927;63:217-41.
54. Fletcher J, Gillen D, Wirz A, et al. Barrett's esophagus evokes a quantitatively and qualitatively altered response to both acid and hypertonic solutions. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:1480-6.
55. Balaban DH, Yamamoto Y, Liu J, et al. Sustained esophageal contraction: a marker of esophageal chest pain identified by intraluminal ultrasonography. Gastroenterology 1999;116:29-37.
56. Price SF, Smithson KW, Castell DO. Food sensitivity in reflux esophagitis. Gastroenterology 1978;75:240-3.
57. Lloyd DA, Borda IT. Food-induced heartburn: effect of osmolality. Gastroenterology 1981;80:740-1.
58. Mattioli S, Pilotti V, Felice V, et al. Ambulatory 24-hr pH monitoring of esophagus, fundus, and antrum. A new technique for simultaneous study of gastroesophageal and duodenogastric reflux. Dig Dis Sci 1990;35:929-38.
59. Flood CA, Fink S, Mathers J. Pain due to esophageal distention. Am J Dig Dis 1963;66:632-8.
60. Marshall RE, Anggiansah A, Owen WA, et al. The relationship between acid and bile reflux and symptoms in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gut 1997;40:182-7.
61. Sears RJ, Champion GL, Richter JE. Characteristics of distal partial gastrectomy patients with esophageal symptoms of duodenogastric reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:211-15.
62. Koek GH, Tack J, Sifrim D, et al. The role of acid and duodenal gastroesophageal reflux in symptomatic GERD. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:2033-40.
63. Vaezi MF, Lacamera RG, Richter JE. Validation studies of Bilitec 2000: an ambulatory duodenogastric reflux monitoring system. Am J Physiol 1994;267:G1050-7.
64. Silny J. Intraluminal multiple electric impedance procedure for measurement of gastrointestinal motility. J Gastrointest Motil 1991;3:151-62.
65. Vela MF, Camacho-Lobato L, Srinivasan R, et al. Simultaneous intraesophageal impedance and pH measurement of acid and nonacid gastroesophageal reflux: effect of omeprazole. Gastroenterology 2001;120:1599-606.
66. Vela MF, Tutuian R, Sifrim D, et al. Comparison of pH-metry versus combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH (MII-pH) for symptom association studies in symptomatic acid suppressed GERD patients. Gastroenterology 2004;124:A524.
67. Shay S, Sifrim D, Tutuian R, et al. Multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) in trie evaluation of patients with persistant GERD symptoms despite proton pump inhibitors (PPI): a multicenter study. Gastroenterology 2003;124:A537.
68. Mainie I, Tutuian R, Agrawal A, et al. Reflux (acid or non-acid) detected by multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH testing predicts good symptom response from fundoplication. Gastroenterology 2005;128:822.
69. Sifrim D, Dupont L, Blondeau K, et al. Weakly acidic reflux in patients with chronic unexplained cough during 24 hour pressure, pH, and impedance monitoring. Gut 2005;54:449-54.
70. Pandolfino JE, Richter JE, Ours T, et al. Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:740-9.
71. Clouse RE, Prakash C, Haroian LR. Symptom association tests are improved by the extented ambulatory pH recording time with the Bravo capsule. Gastroenterology 2003;124:A537.