Relative importance of the components of stent geometry to stretch induced in-stent neointima formation

Heart

Volumn 91, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1603-1604

  Dean, C J ^a   Morton, A C ^a   Arnold, N D ^a   Hose, D R ^a   Crossman, D C ^a   Gunn, Julian ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b NORTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANGIOGENESIS; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BALLOON; CORONARY ARTERY; CORONARY STENT; GEOMETRY; IMPLANTATION; INTIMA; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SWINE; THICKNESS; TISSUE SECTION;

ANIMALS; ARTERIES; CORONARY VESSELS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; STENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SWINE; TUNICA INTIMA;

EID: 28144445142     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2004.047050     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Schwartz RS, Huber KC, Murphy JG, et al. Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:267-74.
2. Gunn J, Arnold N, Chan KH, et al. Coronary artery stretch versus deep injury in the development of in-stent neointima. Heart 2002;88:401-5.
3. Garasic JM, Edelman ER, Squire JC, et al. Stent and artery geometry to determine intimal thickening independent of arterial injury. Circulation 2000;101:812-8.
4. Kastrati A, Stühlen H, Hausleiter J, et al. Intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: strut thickness effect on restenosis outcome (ISAR-STEREO) trial. Circulation 2001;103:2816-21.
5. Schultz C, Herrmann RA, Beilharz C, et al. Coronary stent symmetry and vascular injury determine experimental restenosis. Heart 2000;83:462-7.