Repositories: What is the target? An arrow perspective

New Review of Information Networking

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 123-134

  Whitehead, Derek ^a  

^a SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH LABORATORIES;

REPOSITORIES; SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

EID: 28144439467     PISSN: 13614576     EISSN: 17407869     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13614570500293553     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. ACRL. 2005. SPARC ACRL IR Workshop: 'Building a successful institutional repository: an introduction for smaller libraries', ACRL 12th Annual Conference, 8 April 2005, Minneapolis, MM. http://www.arl.org/sparc/meetings/acrl05/index.html (accessed 3 October 2005).
2. ANTELMAN, K. 2004. Do open access articles have a greater research impact? College and Research Libraries, 65(5): 372-382. http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/staff/kantelman/do_open_access_CRL.pdf (accessed 3 October 2005).
3. ARTHUR, E. 2004. Presentation to 'Changing Research Practices in the Digital Information and Communication Environment', Canberra, 1 June 2004. http://www.humanities.org.au/NSCF/current.htm (accessed March 2005).
4. CALLAN, P. 2004. The development and implementation of a university-wide self-archiving policy at Queensland University of Technology: Insights from the frontline. Paper presented at 'Institutional Repositories: the Next Stage'. Workshop presented by SPARC and SPARC EUROPE, 18-19 November 2004, Washington DC. Washington: SPARC. http://www.arl.org/sparc/meetings/ir04/presentations/callan_files/callan.pdf (accessed 3 October 2005).
5. CARR, L. and HARNAD, S. 2005. Keystroke economy: a study of the time and effort involved in self-archiving. Public Draft 1: eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/10688/01/KeystrokeCosting-publicdraft1.pdf (accessed 15 March 2005).
6. CROW, R. 2002. The case for institutional repositories - a SPARC position paper. Release 1.0 SPARC, 2002, p. 6: http://www.lib.duke.edu/its/diglib/digarchive/repositories.html (accessed 3 October 2005).
7. DAY, M. 2004. Institutional repositories and research assessment. A supporting study for the ePrints UK project, v. 0.1 (draft), pp.13ff. http://www.rdn.ac.uk/projects/eprints-uk/docs/studies/rae/rae-study.pdf (accessed 2 December 2004).
8. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND TRAINING (DEST). 2005. Research quality framework: assessing the quality and impact of research in Australia. Issues paper. Canberra, DEST. http://www.dest.gov.au/resqual/issues_paper.htm (accessed March 2005).
9. FOSTER, N. and GIBBONS, S. 2005. Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories. D-Lib Magazine, 11(1) (January 2005). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january05/foster/01foster.html (accessed 3 October 2005).
10. HARNAD, S. 2005. The implementation of the Berlin Declaration on Open Access: report on the Berlin 3 meeting held 28 February-1 March 2005, Southampton, UK. D-Lib Magazine, 11(3). http://www.dlib.org/dlib.march05/harnad/03harnad.html (accessed March 2005).
11. HARNAD, S. et al. 2004. The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. Serials Review, 30(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.013 (accessed 3 October 2005).
12. HEERY, R. and ANDERSON, S. 2005. Digital repositories review. Final draft, UKOLN, 2005. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/rep-review-final-20050220.pdf (accessed 19 February 2005).
13. HEY, J. 2004. Targeting academic research with Southampton's institutional repository. Ariadne Issue 40 (July 2004): 8-9. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue40/hey (accessed 3 October 2005).
14. HUBBARD, B. 2005. Open access institutional repositories in UK universities. Presentation to the Berlin 3 Meeting, 28 February-1 March 2005, Southampton, UK. www.eprints.org/berlin3/ppts/03-BillHubbard.ppt (accessed 3 October 2005).
15. HYATT, S. and YOUNG, J. 2005. OCLC research publications repository. D-Lib Magazine, 11(3) (Mar 2005) http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march05/hyatt/03hyatt.html (accessed March 2005).
16. MACKIE, M. 2004. Filling institutional repositories: practical strategies from the DAEDALUS Project. Ariadne Issue 39 (April 2004). http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue39/mackie (accessed 3 October 2005).
17. MARK WARE CONSULTING. 2004. Publisher and library/learning solutions (PALS): pathfinder research on Web-based repositories. Final Report. Bristol, PALS, pp. 20-21. http://www.palsgroup.org.uk/ (accessed 3 October 2005).
18. POYNDER, R. 2004. Ten years after. Information Today, 21(9): 1-3.
19. POYNDER, R. 2005. Time to walk the talk? Open and Shut, 17 March 2005. p. 4 http://poynder.blogspot.com/2005/03/time-to-walk-talk.html (accessed 3 October 2005).
20. SWAN, A. et al. 2004. Delivery, management and access model for e-prints and open access journals within further and higher education: a joint report by the Electronic Publishing Innovation Centre (EPIC) in partnership with Key Perspectives Limited. Loughborough: EPIC and Key Perspectives Ltd. pp. 7-8, 72-75. http://www.keyperspectives.co.uk/OpenAccessArchive/E-prints_delivery_model.pdf (accessed March 2005).
21. SWAN, A et al. 2005. Developing a model for e-prints and open access journal content in UK further and higher education. Learned Publishing, 18(1): 25-40. www.keyperspectives.co.uk/OpenAccessArchive/Eprints_LP_paper.pdf (accessed March 2005).
22. TANANBAUM, G. 2005. Institutional repositories: crossing the chasms. Paper presented at Information Online 2005: 12th Exhibition and Conference, Sydney, 1-3 February 2005. http://conferences.alia.org.au/online2005/papersandpresentations. php (accessed 3 October 2005).