Modelling of stream fishes in the Great Plains, USA

Ecology of Freshwater Fish

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 361-374

  Oakes, R M ^a,b   Gido, K B ^a   Falke, J A ^a,c   Olden, J D ^c,d   Brock, B L ^e  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^e WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial neural networks; Classification trees; Geographical information system; Great Plains; Linear discriminant function analysis; Predictive modelling

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; GIS; ICHTHYOFAUNA; STREAM;

GREAT PLAINS; NORTH AMERICA;

NOTROPIS TOPEKA; PISCES;

EID: 28144434047     PISSN: 09066691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0633.2005.00110.x     Document Type: Review

References (75)

1. Allan, J.D. & Flecker, A.S. 1993. Biodiversity conservation in running waters. BioScience 43: 32-43.
2. Angermeier, P.L., Krueger, K.L. & Dolloff, C.A. 2002. Discontinuity in stream-fish distributions: implications for assessing and predicting species occurrence. In: Scott, J.M., Heglund, P.J. & Morrison, M.L., eds. Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 519-527.
3. Berkman, H.E. & Rabeni, C.F. 1987. Effect of siltation on stream fish communities. Environmental Biology of Fishes 18: 285-294.
4. Bishop, C.M. 1995. Neural networks for pattern recognition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5. Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, A. & Stone, C.G. 1984. Classification and regression trees. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth International Group.
6. Brosse, S. & Lek, S. 1999. Predicting fish distribution in a mesotrophic lake by hydroacoustic survey and artificial neural networks. Limnology and Oceanography 44: 1293-1303.
7. Cross, F.B. & Collins, J.T. 1995. Fishes in Kansas, 2nd edn. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Natural History Museum.
8. Cross, F.B. & Moss, R.E. 1987. Historic changes in fish communities and aquatic habitats in plains streams of Kansas. In: Matthews, W.J. & Heins, D.C., eds. Community and evolutionary ecology of North American stream fishes. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, pp. 155-165.
9. Cross, F.B., Moss, R.E. & Collins, J.T. 1985. Assessment of dewatering impacts on stream fisheries in the Arkansas and Cimarron Rivers. Pratt, KS: Kansas Fish and Game Commission, Nongame Contract 46.
10. De'ath, G. & Fabricius, K.E. 2000. Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81: 3178-3192.
11. Dodds, W.K., Gido, K.B., Whiles, M.R., Fritz, K.M. & Matthews, W.J. 2004. Life on the edge: ecology of prairie streams. BioScience 54: 205-216.
12. Efron, B. 1975. The efficiency of logistic regression compared to normal discriminant analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 70: 892-898.
13. Eschner, T.R., Hadley, R.F. & Crowley, K.D. 1983. Hydrologic and morphologic changes in channels of the Platte River basin in Colorado, Wyoming, and Nebraska: a historical perspective. Washington, DC: US Geological Survey, Professional Paper 1277-A.
14. Falke, J.A. & Gido, K.B. (in press). Spatial effects of reservoirs on fish assemblages in Great Plains streams in Kansas, USA. River Research and Applications.
15. Fausch, K.D. & Bestgen, K.R. 1997. Ecology of fishes indigenous to the central and southwestern Great Plains. In: Knopf, F.L. & Samson, F.B., eds. Ecology and conservation of Great Plains vertebrates. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, pp. 131-166.
16. Fausch, K.D. & Bramblett, R.G. 1991. Disturbance and fish communities in intermittent tributaries of a western Great Plains river. Copeia 1991: 659-674.
17. Fausch, K.D., Torgersen, C.E., Baxter, C.V. & Li, H.W. 2002. Landscapes to riverscapes: bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. BioScience 52: 483-498.
18. Frissell, C.A., Liss, W.J., Warren, C.E. & Hurley, M.D. 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environmental Management 10: 199-214.
19. Gido, K.B., Guy, C.S., Strakosh, T.R., Bernot, R.J., Hase, K.J. & Shaw, M.A. 2002. Long-term changes in the fish assemblages of the Big Blue River basin 40 years after the construction of Tuttle Creek Reservoir. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 105: 193-208.
20. Gido, K.B., Schaefer, J.F. & Pigg, J. 2004. Patterns of fish invasions in the Great Plains of North America. Biological Conservation 118: 121-131.
21. Guisan, A. & Zimmermann, N.E. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135: 147-186.
22. Hang, A.L. & Fausch, K.D. 2002. Minimum habitat requirements for establishing translocated cutthroat trout populations. Ecological Applications 12: 535-551.
23. Haslouer, S.G., Eberle, M.E., Edds, D.E., Gido, K.B., Mammoliti, C.S., Triplet, J.R., Collins, J.T., Distler, D.A., Huggins, D.G. & Stark, W.J. 2005. Current status of native fish species in Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 108: 32-46.
24. Joy, M.K. & Death, R.G. 2002. Predictive modeling of freshwater fish as a biomonitoring tool in New Zealand. Freshwater Biology 47: 2261-2275.
25. Labbe, R. & Fausch, K.D. 2000. Dynamics of intermittent stream habitat regulate persistence of a threatened fish at multiple scales. Ecological Applications 10: 1774-1791.
26. Lek, S. & Guégan, J.F. 2000. Artificial neuronal networks, applications to ecology and evolution. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
27. Magnuson, J.J., Tonn, W.M., Banerjee, A., Toivonen, J., Sanchez, O. & Rask, M. 1998. Isolation vs. extinction in the assembly of fishes in small northern lakes. Ecology 79: 2941-2956.
28. Maidment, D.R. 2002. Arc Hydro: GIS for Water Resources. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.
29. Mandrak, N.B. 1995. Biogeographic patterns of fish species richness in Ontario lakes in relation to historical and environmental factors. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52: 1462-1474.
30. Manel, S., Dias, J. & Ormerod, S.J. 1999. Comparing discriminant analysis, neural networks and logistic regression for predicting species distributions: a case study with a Himalayan river bird. Ecological Modelling 120: 337-347.
31. Manel, S., Williams, H.C. & Ormerod, S.J. 2001. Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence. Journal of Applied Ecology 38: 921-931.
32. Mastrorillo, S., Lek, S., Dauba, F. & Belaud, A. 1997. The use of artificial neural networks to predict the presence of small-bodied fish in a river. Freshwater Biology 38: 237-246.
33. Matthews, W.J. 1987. Physiochemical tolerance and selectivity of stream fishes as related to their geographic ranges and local distributions. In: Matthews, W.J. & Heins, B.C., eds. Community and evolutionary ecology of North American stream fishes. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, pp. 111-120.
34. Matthews, W.J. 1988. North American prairie streams as systems for ecological study. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7: 387-409.
35. Matthews, W.J. & Robison, H.W. 1988. The distribution of the fishes of Arkansas: a multivariate approach. Copeia 1988: 358-374.
36. Matthews, W.J., Cashner, R.C. & Oelwick, F.P. 1988. Stability and persistence of fish faunas and assemblages in three midwestern streams. Copeia 1988: 947-955.
37. Meador, M.R., Cuffney, T.F. & Gurtz, M.E. 1993. Methods for sampling fish communities as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program. Denver, CO: US Geological Survey, Open-File Report, pp. 93-104.
38. Minckley, W.L. 1959. Fishes of the Big Blue River basin, Kansas. Kansas University Museum of Natural History Publications 11: 401-442.
39. Nelson, R.L., Platts, W.S., Larsen, D.R & Jensen, S.E. 1992. Trout distribution and habitat in relation to geology and geomorphology in the North Fork Humboldt River drainage, northeastern Nevada. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 121: 405-426.
40. NRCS 1994. State soil geographic (STATSGO) database for Kansas. Fort Worth, TX: Natural Resources Conservation Service.
41. Oberdorff, T., Pont, D., Hugueny, B. & Chessel, D. 2001. A probabilistic model characterizing fish assemblages of French rivers: a framework for environmental assessment. Fresh-water Biology 46: 399-415.
42. Olden, J.D. & Jackson, D.A. 2001. Fish-habitat relationships in lakes: gaining predictive and explanatory insight by using artificial neural networks. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130: 878-897.
43. Olden, J.D. & Jackson, D.A. 2002. A comparison of statistical approaches for modeling fish species distributions. Fresh-water Biology 47: 1976-1995.
44. Olden, J.D., Jackson, D.A. & Peres-Neto, P.R. 2002. Predictive models of fish species distributions: a note on proper validation and chance predictions. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 131: 329-336.
45. Olden, J.D., Joy, M.K. & Death, R.G. 2004. An accurate comparison of methods for quantifying variable importance in artificial neural networks using simulated data. Ecological Modelling 178:389-397.
46. Osborne, L.L. & Wiley, M.J. 1992. Influence of tributary spatial position on the structure of warmwater fish communities. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49: 671-681.
47. Porter, M.S., Rosenfeld, J. & Parkinson, E.A. 2000. Predictive models of fish species distribution in the Blackwater drainage, British Columbia. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 20: 349-359.
48. Quist, M.C., Rahel, F.J. & Hubert, W.A. 2005. Hierarchical faunal filters: an approach to assessing effects of habitat and nonnative species on native fishes. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 14: 24-39.
49. Rathert, D., White, D., Sifneos, J.C. & Hughes, R.M. 1999. Environmental correlates of species richness for native freshwater fish in Oregon, USA. Journal of Biogeography 26: 257-273.
50. Rejwan, C., Collins, N.C., Brunner, J., Shuter, B.J. & Ridgway, M.S. 1999. Tree regression analysis on the nesting habitat of smallmouth bass. Ecology 80: 341-348.
51. Roth, N.E., Allan, J.D. & Erickson, D.L. 1996. Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales. Landscape Ecology 11: 141-156.
52. Samson, F. & Knopf, F. 1994. Prairie conservation in North America. BioScience 44: 418-421.
53. Scheidegger, A.E. 1965. The algebra of stream-order numbers. Washington, DC: US Geological Survey, Professional Paper 525B.
54. Scheller, R.M., Snarski, V.M., Eaton, J.G. & Oehlert, G.W. 1999. An analysis of the influence of annual thermal variables on the occurrence of fifteen warmwater fishes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 128: 257-264.
55. Schlosser, I.J. 1991. Stream fish ecology: a landscape perspective. BioScience 41: 704-712.
56. Schlosser, I.J. & Angermeier, P.L. 1995. Spatial variation in demographic processes in lotie fishes: conceptual models, empirical evidence, and implications for conservation. In: Nielsen, J.L. & Powers, D.A., eds. Evolution and the aquatic ecosystem: defining unique units in population conservation. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society, Symposium 17, pp. 392-401.
57. Scott, J.M., Heglund, P.J. & Morrison, M.L. (eds) 2002. Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, DC.
58. Sheldon, A.L. 1968. Species diversity and longitudinal succession in stream fishes. Ecology 49: 193-198.
59. Shrank, S.J., Guy, C.S., Whiles, M.R. & Brock, B.L. 2001. Influence of instream and landscape-level factors on the distribution of Topeka shiners Notropis topeka in Kansas streams. Copeia 2001: 413-421.
60. Skalski, G.T. & Gilliam, J.F. 2000. Modeling diffusive spread in a heterogeneous population: a movement study with stream fish. Ecology 81: 1685-1700.
61. Smale, M.A. & Rabeni, C.F. 1995. Hypoxia and hyperthermia tolerances of headwater stream fishes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 124: 698-710.
62. Smith, C.L. & Powell, C.R. 1971. The summer fish communities of Brier Creek, Marshall County. Oklahoma American Museum Novitiates 2458: 1-30.
63. Strahler, A.N. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 38; 913-920.
64. Titus, K., Mosher, J.A. & Williams, B.K. 1984. Chance-corrected classification for use in discriminant analysis: ecological applications. American Midland Naturalist 111: 1-7.
65. Tonn, W.M. 1990. Climate change and fish communities: a conceptual framework. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 119: 337-352.
66. Townsend, C.R., Doledec, S., Norris, R., Peacock, K. & Arbuckle, C. 2003. The influence of scale and geography on relationships between stream community composition and landscape variables: description and prediction. Freshwater Biology 48: 768-785.
67. USGS 1994. USGS land use and land cover (LULC) data. Sioux Falls, SD: US Geological Survey.
68. USGS 1997. National hydrography dataset. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.
69. Vander Zanden, M.J., Olden, J.D., Thorne, J.H. & Mandrak, N.B. 2004. Predicting the occurrence and impact of bass introductions on temperate lake food webs. Ecological Applications 14: 132-148.
70. Wall, S.S., Berry, C.R., Blausey, C.M., Jenks, J.A. & Kopplin, C.J. 2004. Fish-habitat modeling for gap analysis to conserve the endangered Topeka shiner (Notropis topeka). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61: 954-973.
71. Wang, L., Lyons, J., Kanehl, P. & Gatti, R. 1997. Influences of watershed land use on habitat quality and biotic integrity in Wisconsin streams. Fisheries 22: 6-12.
72. Williams, P.H. & Araujo, M.B. 2000. Using probability of persistence to identify important areas for biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 267: 1959-1966.
73. Winston, M.R., Taylor, C.M. & Pigg, J. 1991. Upstream extirpation of four minnow species due to damming of a prairie stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 120: 98-105.
74. Wischmeier, W.H. 1976. Use and misuse of the universal soil loss equation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 31: 5-9.
75. Zorn, T.G., Seelbach, P.W. & Wiley, M.J. 2002. Distributions of stream fishes and their relationship to stream size and hydrology in Michigan's lower peninsula. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 131: 70-85.