Ureteral segmental replacement revisited

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 19, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 1069-1074

  El Hakim, Assaad ^a,b   Marcovich, Robert ^a   Chiu, Kun Yan ^a   Lee, Benjamin R ^a   Smith, Arthur D ^a  

^a LONG ISLAND JEWISH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b ROYAL VICTORIA HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALPHA SMOOTH MUSCLE ACTIN; ANTIBODY; CYTOKERATIN; CYTOKERATIN AE1; CYTOKERATIN AE3; EOSIN; HEMATOXYLIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACID BASE BALANCE; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOG; ELECTROLYTE BLOOD LEVEL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; IMMUNOHISTOLOGY; KIDNEY FUNCTION; NONHUMAN; OMENTUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGENERATION; RETROGRADE PYELOGRAPHY; SMALL INTESTINE; SUBMUCOSA; SWINE; URETER REPLACEMENT; URETER STRICTURE; UROTHELIUM; VASCULARIZATION; ANIMAL; BLADDER; CELL TRANSPLANTATION; CYTOLOGY; EPITHELIUM CELL; INTESTINE MUCOSA; METHODOLOGY; SMOOTH MUSCLE; TRANSPLANTATION; URETER; UROLOGIC SURGERY;

ANIMALS; CELL TRANSPLANTATION; DOGS; EPITHELIAL CELLS; FEMALE; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; MUSCLE, SMOOTH; SWINE; URETER; URINARY BLADDER; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 28044470943     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2005.19.1069     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Verduyckt FJ, Heesakkers JP, Debruyne FM. Long-term results of ileum interposition for ureteral obstruction. Eur Urol 2002; 42:181-187.
2. Cheng EY, Kropp BP. Urologic tissue engineering with small-intestinal submucosa: Potential clinical applications. World J Urol 2000;18:26-30
3. Oberpenning F, Meng J, Yoo JJ, Atala A. De novo reconstitution of a functional mammalian urinary bladder by tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol 1999;17:149-155.
4. Jaffe JS, Ginsberg PC, Yanoshak SJ, et al. Ureteral segment replacement using a circumferential small-intestinal submucosa xenogenic graft. J Invest Surg 2001;14:259-265.
5. Smith TG 3rd, Gettman M, Lindberg G, Napper C, Pearle MS, Cadeddu JA. Ureteral replacement using porcine small intestine submucosa in a porcine model. Urology 2002;60:931-934.
6. Liatsikos EN, Dinlenc CZ, Kapoor R, Alexianu M, Yohannes P, Anderson AE, Smith AD. Laparoscopic ureteral reconstruction with small intestinal submucosa. J Endourol 2001;15:217-220.
7. El-Assmy A, Hafez AT, El-Sherbiny MT, El-Hamid MA, Mohsen T, Nour EM, Bazeed M. Use of single layer small intestinal submucosa for long segment ureteral replacement: A pilot study. J Urol 2004;171:1939-1942.
8. Sofer M, Rowe E, Forder DM, Denstedt JD. Ureteral segmental replacement using multilayer porcine small-intestinal submucosa. J Endourol 2002;16:27-31.
9. Knapp PM, Lingeman JE, Siegel YI, Badylak SF, Demeter RJ. Biocompatibility of small-intestinal submucosa in urinary tract as augmentation cystoplasty graft and injectable suspension. J Endourol 1994;8:125-130.
10. Probst M, Piechota HJ, Dahiya R, Tanagho EA. Homologous bladder augmentation in dog with the bladder acellular matrix graft. BJU Int 2000;85:362-371.
11. Dahms SE, Piechota HJ, Nunes L, Dahiya R, Lue TF, Tanagho EA. Free ureteral replacement in rats: Regeneration of ureteral wall components in the acellular matrix graft. Urology 1997;50:818-825.
12. Merguerian P, Chavez DR, Hakim S. Grafting of cultured uroepithelium and bladder mucosa into de-epithelialized segments of colon in rabbits. J Urol 1994;152:671-674.