Determining overall risk

Journal of Risk Research

Volumn 8, Issue 7-8, 2005, Pages 569-581

  Campbell, Scott ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Expected utility; Harm; Probability; Risk; Risk analysis; Risk benefit analysis

Indexed keywords

COSTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

RISK JOURNAL LITERATURE; RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 28044470734     PISSN: 13669877     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13669870500118329     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Apostolakis, G. (1990) The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems, Science 250, 1359-64.
2. Bier, V. M. and Mosleh, A. (1988) The subjective Bayesian approach to PRA: theoretical and practical perspectives, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 23, 269-75.
3. Hansson, B. (1975) The appropriateness of the expected utility model, Erkenntnis 9, 175-93.
4. Hansson, S. O. (1993) The false promises of risk analysis, Ratio 6, 16-26.
5. Hansson, S. O. (2004) Weighing risks and benefits, Topoi 23(2), 145-52.
6. Kaplan, S. (1988) Will the real probability please stand up? Reliability Engineering and System Safety 23, 285-92.
7. Kaplan, S. and Garrick, B. J. (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk, Risk Analysis 1(1), 11-27.
8. Martz, H. F. and Waller, R. A. (1988) On the meaning of probability, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 23, 299-304.
9. Rescher, N. (1983) Risk: A Philosophical Introduction to the Theory of Risk Evaluation and Management, Washington, DC: University Press of America.
10. Siu, N. O. and Kelly, D. L. (1998) 'Bayesian parameter estimation in probabilistic risk assessment, Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety 62, 89-116.
11. Tversky, A. (1967) Additivity, utility and subjective probability, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 4, 175-201.