Comparison of running and interrupted vesicourethral anastomoses in a porcine model

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 19, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 1109-1113

  Lieber, David ^a   Tran, Veronique ^a   Belani, Jay ^a   Ames, Caroline ^a   Morissey, Kevin ^a   Yan, Yan ^a   Humphrey, Peter ^a   Venkatesh, Ramakrishna ^a   Landman, Jaime ^a,b,c  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Columbia University School of Medicine ^*  (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; EXPERIENCE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; INTERRUPTED SUTURE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LEARNING; MYOFIBROSIS; NONHUMAN; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; RUNNING SUTURE; SCORING SYSTEM; SUTURING METHOD; SWINE; VESICOURETHRAL ANASTOMOSIS;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANIMALS; LAPAROSCOPY; MODELS, ANIMAL; PROSTATECTOMY; SWINE; URETHRA; URINARY BLADDER; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 28044465134     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2005.19.1109     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial short-term experience. Urology 1997;50:854.
2. Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Barret E, et al. Prostatectomie radicale cœlioscopique: Première évaluation après 28 interventions. Presse Med 1998;27:1570.
3. Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Barret E, Rozet F, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Technical and early oncological assessment of 40 operations. Eur Urol 1999;36:14.
4. Raboy A, Ferzli G, Albert P. Initial experience with endoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 1997;50:849.
5. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; Initial experience and preliminary assessment after 65 operations. Prostate 1999;39:71.
6. Hoznek A, Salomon L, Rabii R, et al. Vesicourethral anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The running suture method. J Endourol 2000;14:749.
7. Van Velthoven R, Ahlering T, Peltier A, et al. Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis: The single knot method. Urology 2003;61:699.
8. Nadu A, Olsson LE, Abbou CC. Simple model for training in the laparoscopic vesicourethral running anastomosis. J Endourol 2003; 17:481.
9. Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody J, et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: Technique. J Urol 2003;169:2289.
10. Behrend M, Kluge E, Schuttler W, Klempnauer J. A comparison of interrupted and continuous sutures for tracheal anastomoses in sheep. Eur J Surg 2002;16:101.
11. Bardini R, Bonavina L, Asolati M, et al. Single-layered cervical esophageal anastomoses: A prospective study of two suturing techniques. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58:1087.
12. Hurwitz A, Amir G, Yagel S, et al. A single continuous suture as a possible alternative to the interrupted suture for tubal anastomosis. Int J Fertil 1990;35:125.
13. Burch JM, Francoise RJ, Moore EE, et al. Single-layer continuous versus two-layer interrupted intestinal anastomosis: A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 2000;231:832.
14. Deen KI, Smart PJ. Prospective evaluation of sutured, continuous, and interrupted single layer colonic anastomoses. Eur J Surg 1995;161:751.
15. Jonsson T, Hogstrom H, Zederfeldt B. Effect of interrupted and continuous suturing on intestinal wound margin strength in rats. Eur Surg Res 1993;25;169.
16. Chen YX, Chen LE, Seaber AV, Urbaniak JR. Comparison of continuous and interrupted suture techniques in microvascular anastomosis. J Hand Surg Am 2001;26:530.
17. Guity A, Young PH, Fischer VW. In search of the "perfect" anastomosis. Microsurgery 1990;11:5.
18. Laskar M, Cornu E, Leman A, et al. [Vascular anastomoses of small caliber vessels: Comparison between continuous or interrupted sutures] (Fre) Presse Med 1988;17:1152.
19. Mao K, Tang MY, South JR. A comparison of continuous with interrupted sutures in microvascular anastomosis. Microsurgery 1985;6:141.
20. Joos KM, Blair WF, Maynard JR. A comparison of continuous and interrupted microarteriorrhaphy. Microsurgery 1985;6:141.
21. Firsching R, Terhaag PD, Muller W, Frowein RA. Continuous- and interrupted-suture technique in microsurgical end-to-end anastomosis. Microsurgery 1984;5:80.
22. Andreoni CR, Hsueh-Kung L, Olweny E, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of ureteral healing after electrosurgical endopyelotomy in a porcine model: Original report and review of the literature. J Urol 2004;171:859.
23. Bhayani SB, Pavlovich CP, Hsu TS, et al. Prospective comparison of short-term convalescence: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2003;61:612.