Remapping hand movements in a novel geometrical environment

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 94, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 4362-4372

  Mosier, Kristine M ^a   Scheidt, Robert A ^b   Acosta, Santiago ^c   Mussa Ivaldi, Ferdinando A ^c,d  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Medical College of Wisconsin and Marquette University   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER; DATA ANALYSIS; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FINGER; GEOMETRY; GESTURE; HAND MOVEMENT; HANDEDNESS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOTOR COORDINATION; MOTOR SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRAINING; VISION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENT; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 28044462173     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00380.2005     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Baillieul J. Kinematic programming alternatives for redundant manipulators. Proc IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom 722-728, 1985.
2. Baker DR and Wampler CW. On the inverse kinematics of redundant manipulators. Int J Robot Res 7: 3-21, 1988.
3. Balasubramaniam R, Riley MA, and Turvey MT. Specificity of postural sway to the demands of a precision task. Gait Posture 11: 12-24, 2000.
4. Ben-Israel A and Greville TNE. Generalized Inverses: Theory and Application. New York: Wiley, 1980.
5. Bernstein N. The Coordination and Regulation of Movement. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 1967.
6. Box GEP and Cox DR. An analysis of transformations. J R Stat Soc Ser B 26: 211-246, 1964.
7. Burdick JW. On the inverse kinematics of redundant manipulators: characterization of the self-motion manifolds. Proc 1989 IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom 264-270, 1989.
8. Cole KJ and Abbs JH. Coordination of three-joint digit movements for rapid finger-thumb grasp. J Neurophysiol 55: 1407-1423, 1986.
9. Dingwell JB, Mah CD, and Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Manipulating objects with internal degrees of freedom: evidence for model-based control. J Neurophysiol 88: 222-235, 2002.
10. Flanagan JR and Rao AK. Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. J Neurophysiol 74: 2174-2178, 1995.
11. Flash T and Hogan N. The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci 5: 1688-1703, 1985.
12. Goldstein H. Classical Mechanics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1980.
13. Goodale MA and Milner AD. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15: 20-25, 1992.
14. Hadamard J. Sur les problèmes aux dérivées partielles et leur signification physique. Princeton Univ Bull 49-52, 1902.
15. Harris CM and Wolpert DM. Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394: 780-784, 1998.
16. Hatfield G. Representation and constraints: the inverse problem and the structure of visual space. Acta Psychol 114: 355-378, 2003.
17. Hogan N. An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements. J Neurosci 4: 2745-2754, 1984.
18. Jerde TE, Soechting JF, and Flanders M. Biological constraints simplify the recognition of hand shapes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 50: 265-269, 2003.
19. Klein CA and Huang CH. Review of pseudoinverse control for use with kinematically redundant manipulators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 13: 245-250, 1983.
20. Lang CE and Schieber MH. Human finger independence: limitations due to passive mechanical coupling versus active neuromuscular control. J Neurophysiol 92: 2802-2810, 2004.
21. Latash ML, Scholz JF, Danion F, and Schoner G. Structure of motor variability in marginally redundant multifinger force production tasks. Exp Brain Res 141: 153-165, 2001.
22. Milner AD and Goodale MA. Visual pathways to perception and action. Prog Brain Res 95: 317-337, 1993.
23. Morasso P. Spatial control of arm movements. Exp Brain Res 42: 223-227, 1981.
24. Mussa-Ivaldi FA and Hogan N. Integrable solutions of kinematic redundancy via impedance control. Int J Robot Res 10: 481-491, 1991.
25. Rossetti Y. Implicit short-lived motor representations of space in brain damaged and healthy subjects. Conscious Cogn 7: 520-558, 1998.
26. Santello M, Flanders M, and Soechting JF. Postural hand synergies for tool use. J Neurosci 18: 10105-10115, 1998.
27. Schieber MH. Individuated movements of rhesus monkeys: means of quantifying the independence of digits. J Neurophysiol 65: 1381-1391, 1991.
28. Scholz JP and Schoner G. The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task. Exp Brain Res 126: 289-306, 1999.
29. Serruya MD, Hatsopoulos NG, Paninski L, Fellows MR, and Donoghue JP. Instant neural control of a movement signal. Nature 416: 141-142, 2002.
30. Shadmehr R and Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14: 3208-3224, 1994.
31. Shamir T and Yomdin Y. Repeatability of redundant manipulators: mathematical solution of the problem. IEEE Trans Autom Contr 33: 1004-1009, 1988.
32. Shepard RN. Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world. Behav Brain Sci 24: 581-601, 2001.
33. Soechting JF and Laquaniti F. Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. J Neurophysiol 49: 548-564, 1981.
34. Taylor DM, Tillery SI, and Schwartz AB. Direct cortical control of 3D neuroprosthetic devices. Science 296: 1829-1832, 2002.
35. Tikhonov AN and Arsenin VY. Solutions of Ill-posed Problems. Washington, DC: W. H. Winston, 1977.
36. Todorov E and Jordan MI. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5: 1226-1235, 2002.
37. Uno Y, Kawato M, and Suzuki R. Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement. Biol Cybern 61: 89-101, 1989.
38. Viviani P and Terzuolo CA. Space-time invariance in learned motor skills. In: Tutorials in Motor Behaviour, edited by Stelmach GE and Requin J. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1980, p. 525-533.
39. Weyl H. Symmetry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 1966.
40. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, and Jordan MI. Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study. Exp Brain Res 103: 460-470, 1995.
41. Zatsiorsky VM, Li ZM, and Latash ML. Enslaving effects in multi-finger force production. Exp Brain Res 131: 187-195, 2000.