Consistent risk management: Three models outlined

Journal of Risk Research

Volumn 8, Issue 7-8, 2005, Pages 557-568

  Hermansson, Hélène ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COSTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

RISK EXPOSURE; TOTAL COST;

RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 28044461977     PISSN: 13669877     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13669870500085189     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ahearne, J. F. (1993) Integrating risk analysis into public policymaking, Environment 35(2), 16-40.
2. Anderson, E. (1993) Value in Ethics and Economics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Baram, M. (1985) The role of consent in managing airborne health risks to workers, in M. Gibson (ed.) To Breathe Freely: Risk, Consent, and Air, pp. 186-97. Totowa: Rowman & Allanheld.
4. Breyer, S. (1999) Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Bäckman, J. (2002) Railway Safety: Risks and Economics, Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology.
6. Cohen, B. L. (1980) Society's valuation of life saving in radiation protection and other contexts, Health Physics 38, 33-51.
7. Fischhoff, B. (1985) Cognitive and institutional barriers to "informed consent", in M. Gibson (ed.) To Breathe Freely: Risk, Consent, and Air, pp. 169-85. Totowa: Rowman & Allanheld.
8. Føllesdal, D. (1986) Risk: philosophical and ethical aspects, in P. Oftedal and A. Brøgger (eds) Risk and Reason: Risk Assessment in Relation to Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens, pp. 41-0-52. New York: Alan R. Liss. Inc.
9. Graham, J. D. (1996) Making sense of risk: an agenda for congress, in R. W. Hahn (ed.) Risks,
10. Costs, and Lives Saved: Getting Better Results from Regulation, pp. 183-207. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Hahn, R. W. (1996) Regulatory reform: What do the government's numbers tell us? in R. W. Hahn (ed.) Risks, Costs, and Lives Saved: Getting Better Results from Regulation, pp. 208-53. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Hansson, S. O. (1999) A philosophical perspective on risk, Ambio 28, 539-42.
13. Hansson, S. O. (2003) Ethical criteria of risk acceptance, Erkenntnis 59, 291-309.
14. Hood, C. and Rothstein, H. (2001) Risk regulation under pressure: Problem solving or blame shifting? Administration and Society 33(1), 21-53.
15. Josefsson, J., Hermerén, G. and Sahlin, N-E. (1994) Ethical aspects of valuing lives, in B. Brehmer and N-E. Sahlin (eds) Future Risks and Risk Management, pp. 93-123. London: Kluwe.
16. Lave, L. B. (1996) Benefit-cost analysis: Do the benefits exceed the costs? in R. W. Hahn (ed.) Risks, Costs, and Lives Saved: Getting Better Results from Regulation, pp. 104-34. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Lutter, R. and Morrall, J. F. (1994) Health and health analysis: A new way to evaluate health and safety regulation, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 8, 43-66.
18. MacLean, D. (ed.) (1986) Values at Risk, Savage: Rowman and Littlefield.
19. Miller III, J. C. and Yandle, B. (1979) Benefit-Cost Analyses of Social Regulation: Case Studies from the Council on Wage and Price Stability, pp. 1-10. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
20. Morone, J. G. and Woodhouse, E. J. (1986) Averting Catastrophe: Strategies for Regulating Risky Technologies, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
21. Morrall, J. F. (1986) A review of the record, Regulation 10, 25-34.
22. Nozick, R. (1992) [1974]: Anarchy, State and Utopia, Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
23. Otway, H. J. and von Winterfeldt, D. (1982) Beyond acceptable risk: On the social acceptability of technologies, Policy Sciences 14, 247-56.
24. Ramsberg, J. (1999) Are All Lives of Equal Value? Studies on the Economics of Risk Regulation, Stockholm: Center for Risk Research, Stockholm School of Economics.
25. Ramsberg, J. (2002) When should expenditure per life saved vary? Journal of Risk Research 5(3), 249-63.
26. Rawls, J. (1999) [1971]: A Theory of Justice, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27. Rayner, S. (1992) Cultural theory and risk analysis, in S. Krimsky and D. Golding (eds) Social Theories of Risk, pp. 83-115. Westpoint, CT: Praeger.
28. Scheffler, S. (1985) The role of consent in the legitimation of risky activity, in M. Gibson (ed.) To Breathe Freely. Risk, Consent, and Air, pp. 75-88. Totowa: Rowman & Allanheld.
29. Scheffler, S. (ed.) (1988) Consequentialism and its Critics, New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Schroeder, C. H. (1986) Rights against risks, Columbia Law Review 86, 495-562.
31. Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (1988) Moral Dilemmas, Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
32. Sjöberg, L. (1999) Life-values and the tyranny of unique decisions, in G. Hermerén and N-E. Sahlin (eds) The Value of Life, pp. 73-84. Stockholm: Kungl Vitterhets historie och antikvitets akad: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
33. Sunstein, C. R. (2002) Risk and Reason: Safety, Law and the Environment, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. Tengs, T. O. and Graham, J. D. (1996) The opportunity costs of haphazard social investments in life-saving, in R. W. Hahn (ed.) Risks, Costs, and Lives Saved: Getting Better Results from Regulation, pp. 167-82. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Thomson, J. J. (1985) Imposing risks, in M. Gibson (ed.) To Breathe Freely: Risk, Consent, and Air, pp. 124-40. Totowa: Rowman & Allanheld.
36. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice, Science 211, 453-58.
37. Viscousi, W. K. (1996) The dangers of unbounded commitments to regulate risk, in R. W. Hahn (ed.) Risks, Costs, and Lives Saved: Getting Better Results from Regulation, pp. 135-66. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Williams, B. (1993) Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, London: Fontana.