Rotifers of Portuguese reservoirs in river Tejo catchment: Relations with trophic state

Limnetica

Volumn 24, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 103-114

  Baiao C ^a   Boavida, M J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA); Rotifers; Trophic state

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS; EUTROPHICATION; HUMAN ACTIVITY; TROPHIC STATUS;

EURASIA; EUROPE; PORTUGAL; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

ROTIFERA;

EID: 28044459686     PISSN: 02138409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ARMENGOL, J. 1980. Colonización de los embalses españoles por crustáaceos planctónicos y evolución de la estructura de sus comunidades. Oecologia Aquatica, 4: 45-70.
2. ATTAYDE, J. L. & R. L. BOZELLI 1998. Assessing the indicator properties of zooplankton assemblages to disturbance gradients by canonical correspondence analysis. Can. J. Aquat. Sci., 55: 1789-1797.
3. BAYS, J. S. & A. P. CRISMAN. 1983. Zooplankton and trophic state relationships in Florida lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 40: 1813-1819.
4. BEAVER, J. R. & T. L. CRISMAN. 1990. Use of microzooplankton as an early indicator of advancing cultural eutrophication. Verh. Internat. Verein Limnol., 24: 532-537.
5. BOAVIDA, M. J. & R. T. MARQUES. 1996. Total phosphorus as an indicator of trophic state of Portuguese reservoirs. Limnetica, 12: 31-37.
6. CARAMUJO, M. J. & M. J. BOAVIDA. 2000. The crustacean communities of river Tagus reservoirs: Zooplankton structure as reservoir trophic state indicator. Limnetica, 18: 37-56.
7. CARLSON, R. E. 1977. A trophic state index for lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr., 22(2): 361-369.
8. DUGGAN, I. C., J. D. GREEN & R. J. SHIEL. 2001. Distribution of rotifers in North Island, New Zealand, and their potential use as bioindicators of lake trophic state. Hydrobiologia, 446/447: 155-164.
9. DUGGAN, I. C., J. D. GREEN & R. J. SHIEL. 2002. Distribution of rotifers in North Island, New Zealand lakes: Relationships to environmental and historical factors. Freshwat. Biol., 47: 195-206.
10. EJSMONT-KARABIN, J. 1995. Rotifer occurrence in relation to age, depth and trophic state of quarry lakes. Hydrobiologia, 313/314: 21-28.
11. GULATI, R. D. 1990. Zooplankton structure in the Loosdrecht lakes in relation to trophic status and recent restoration measures. Hydrobiologia, 191: 173-188.
12. HABERMAN, J. 1995. Estimation of the trophic state of Lake Vortsjarv on the basis of rotifers (Rotatoria). Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci. Biol., 44(3/ 4): 92-105.
13. KARABIN, A. & J. EJSMONT-KARABIN. 1991. Structure, dynamics and distribution of zooplankton, and its many-years' changes in the Wigry Lake. Ekol. Pol., 39(3): 357-375.
14. LYCHE, A. 1990. Cluster analysis of plankton community structure in 21 lakes along a gradient of trophy. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol., 24: 586-591.
15. MÄEMETS, A. 1983. Rotifers as indicators of lake types in Estonia. Hydrobiologia, 104: 357-361.
16. MARQUES, R. T. & M. J. BOAVIDA. 1997. Monitoring water quality in the Portuguese reservoirs of the river Tejo watershed. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol., 26: 740-744.
17. PARK, G. S. & H. G. MARSHALL. 2000a. The trophic contributions of rotifers in tidal freshwater and estuarine habitats. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 51: 729-742.
18. PARK, G. S. & H. G. MARSHALL. 2000b. Estuarine relationships between zooplankton community structure and trophic gradients. J. Plankton Res., 22: 121-135.
19. PONTIN, R. M. 1978. A key to the freshwater planktonic and semi-planktonic Rotifera of the British isles. Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publication no 38, 178 pp.
20. POPP, A., K. D. HOAGLAND & G. L. HERGENRADER. 1996. Zooplankton community response to reservoir aging. Hydrobiologia, 339: 13-21.
21. RADWAN, S. & B. POPIOLEK. 1989. Percentage of rotifers in spring zooplankton in lakes of different trophy. Hydrobiologia, 186/187: 235-238.
22. RUTTNER-KOLISKO, A. 1974. Plankton rotifers: Biology and taxonomy. Die Binnengewässer, 26, Suppl., Schweizerbart, Sutttgart. 146 pp.
23. TER BRAAK, C. J. F. 1986. Canonical Correspondence Analysis: A new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology, 67: 1167-1179.
24. TER BRAAK, C. J. F. & I. C. PRENTICE. 1988. A theory of gradient analysis. Advances in Ecological Research, 18: 217-317.
25. TER BRAAK, C. J. F. & P. F. M. VERDONSCHOT. 1995. Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquatic Sciences, 57: 255-289.
26. YEPPESEN, E., J. P. JENSEN, M. SØNDERGAARD, T. LAURIDSEN & F. LANDKILDEHUS. 2000. Trophic structure, species richness and biodiversity in Danish lakes: Changes along a phosphorus gradient. Freshw. Biol., 45: 201-218.
27. WETZEL, R. G. 2001. Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems. 3rd ed. Academic Press, 1006 pp.
28. ZÁNKAI, N. P. 1984. Predation of Cyclops vicinus (Copepoda: Cyclopoida) on small zooplankton animals in Lake Balaton (Hungary). Arch. Hydrobiol., 99(3): 360-378.
29. ZAR, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. 4th ed. Prentice-Hall Inc., USA, 663 pp.