Efficiency of feed utilisation by livestock - Implications and benefits of genetic improvement

Canadian Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 281-290

  Arthur, P F ^a   Herd, R M ^b  

^a NSW DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Economic benefit; Environmental sustainability; Feed efficiency; Genetics; Physiology

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 28044456728     PISSN: 00083984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4141/A04-062     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. AGO. 2001. Greenhouse emissions from beef cattle. Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
2. AGO. 2004. National greenhouse gas inventory 2002. ISBN: 1 920840 36 2. Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
3. Archer, J. A., Arthur, P. F., Herd, R. M., Parnell, P. F. and Pitchford, W. S. 1997. Optimum postweaning test for measurement of growth rate, feed intake and feed efficiency in British breed cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 75: 2024-2032.
4. Archer, J. A. and Barwick, S. A. 1999. Economic analysis of net feed intake in industry breeding schemes. Proc. Assoc. Adv. Anim. Breed. Genet. 13: 337-340.
5. Archer, J. A., Barwick, S. A. and Graser, H-U. 2004. Economic evaluation of beef cattle breeding schemes incorporating performance testing of young bulls for feed intake. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 44: 393-404.
6. Archer, J. A., Reverter, A., Herd, R. M., Johnston, D. J. and Arthur, P. F. 2002. Genetic variation in feed intake and efficiency of mature beef cows and relationships with postweaning measurements. Proc. 7th Wld. Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod. 31: 221-224.
7. Archer, J. A., Richardson, E. C., Herd, R. M. and Arthur, P. F. 1999. Potential for selection to improve efficiency of feed use in beef cattle: a review. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 50: 147-161.
8. Arthur, P. F., Archer, J. A. and Herd, R. M. 2004a. Feed intake and efficiency in beef cattle: Overview of recent Australian research and challenges for the future. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 44: 361-369.
9. Arthur, P. F., Archer, J. A., Reverter, A., Johnston, D. J. and Herd, R. M. 2004b. Genetic correlations between postweaning feed efficiency and cow traits. J. Anim. Sci. 82 (Suppl.): 449.
10. Arthur, P. F. and Herd, R. M. 2004. Reproductive performance of females divergently selected for residual feed intake. Proc. Joint Conference of Can. Soc. Agron., Can. Soc. Anim. Sci. and Can. Soc. Soil. Sci., Edmonton, AB. July 2004. p. 112.
11. Arthur, P. F., Herd, R. M., Archer, J. A., Anderson, C. A. and Muir, L. L. (eds.). 2004c. Efficiency of feed utilisation by animals. Special Issue. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 44: 361-506.
12. Arthur, P. F., Herd, R. M., Johnston, D. J., Moore, K. and Graser, H-U. 2004d. Incorporating information on plasma IGF-I concentration in genetic improvement strategies for feed efficiency in beef cattle. Proc. Joint Conference of Can. Soc. Agron., Can. Soc. Anim. Sci. and Can. Soc. Soil. Sci., Edmonton, AB. July 2004. p. 115.
13. Arthur, P. F., Renand, G. and Krauss, D. 2001. Genetic and phenotypic relationships among different measures of growth and feed efficiency in young Charolais bulls. Livest. Prod. Sci. 68: 131-139.
14. Basarab, J. A., Price, M. A., Aalhus, J. L., Okine, E. K., Snelling, W. M. and Lyle, K. L. 2003. Residual feed intake and body composition in young growing cattle. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 83: 189-204.
15. Buchanan, F. C., Fitzsimmons, C. J., Van Kessels, A. G., Thue, T. D., Winkelman Sim, D. C. and Schmutz, S. M. 2002. Association of a missense mutation in the bovine leptin gene with carcass fat content and leptin mRNA levels. Genet. Sel. Evol. 34: 105-116.
16. Cameron, N. D. 1998. Across species comparisons in selection for efficiency. Proc. 6th Wld. Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod. 25: 73-80.
17. Carstens, G. E., Theis, C. M., White, M. D., Welsh, T. H., Jr., Warrington, B. G., Randel, R. D., Forbes, T. D. A., Lippke, H., Greene, L. W. and Lunt, D. K. 2002. Residual feed intake in beef steers: I. Correlations with performance traits and ultrasound measures of body composition. J. Anim. Sci. 80 (Suppl. 2): 135.
18. de Vries, A. G. and Kanis, E. 1992. A growth model to estimate economic values for food intake capacity in pigs. Anim. Prod. 55: 241-247.
19. Dove, H. and Mayes, R. W. 1991. The use of plant wax alkanes as marker substances in studies of the nutrition of herbivores: A review. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 42: 913-952.
20. Dove, H. and Mayes, R. W. 1996. Plant wax components: A new approach to estimating intake and diet composition in herbivores. J. Nutr. 126: 13-26.
21. Eissen, J. J. 2000. Breeding for feed intake capacity in pigs. Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, the Netherlands.
22. Eissen, J. J., de Haan, A. G. and Kanis, E. 1999. Effect of missing data on the estimate of average daily feed intake of growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 77: 1372-1378.
23. Environment Canada. 2004. Canada's 2002 Greenhouse gas inventory. Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON.
24. Exton, S. C., Herd, R. M., Davies, L., Archer, J. A. and Arthur, P. F. 2000. Commercial benefits to the beef industry from genetic improvement in net feed efficiency. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 13 (Suppl.): B:338-341.
25. Fairfull, R. W. and Chambers, J. R. 1984. Breeding for feed efficiency: poultry. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 64: 513-537.
26. Fan, L. Q., Bailey, D. R. C. and Shannon, N. H. 1995. Genetic parameter estimation of post-weaning gain, feed intake and feed efficiency for Hereford and Angus bulls fed two different diets. J. Anim. Sci. 73: 365-372.
27. Farquharson, R. 1993. What is the cost of feed? Pages 33-40 in Proceedings of the 3rd National Conference of the Beef Improvement Association of Australia. Beef Improvement Association of Australia: Ballarat, Australia.
28. Hebart, M. L., Pitchford, W. S., Arthur, P. F., Archer, J. A., Herd, R. M. and Bottema, C. D. K. 2004. Effect of missing data on estimate of average daily feed intake in beef cattle. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 44: 415-421.
29. Hennessy, D. W. and Arthur, P. F. 2004. The effect of preweaning growth restriction on the feed intake and efficiency of cattle on a grain-based diet prior to slaughter. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 44: 483-488.
30. Hegarty, R. S., Shand, C., Harris, C. and Nolan, J. V. 2000. Productivity and pasture intake of defaunated crossbred sheep flocks. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 40: 655-662.
31. Henman, D. 2003. Nutritional management in integrated pig units. Pages 11-132 in J. Wiseman, M. A. Varely, and B. Kemp, eds. Perspectives in pig science. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.
32. Herd, R. M., Arthur, P. F., Hegarty, R. S. and Archer, J. A. 2002a. Potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from beef production by selection for reduced residual feed intake. 7th Wld. Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod. 31: 281-284.
33. Herd, R. M., Hegarty, R. S., Dicker, R. W., Archer, J. A. and Arthur, P. F. 2002b. Selection for residual feed intake improves feed conversion ratio on pasture. Anim. Prod. Aust. 24: 85-88.
34. Herd, R. M., Dicker, R. W., Lee, G. J., Johnston, D. J., Hammond, A. J. and Oddy, V. H. 2004a. Steer growth and feed efficiency on pasture are favourably associated with genetic variation in sire net feed intake. Anim. Prod. Aust. 25: 93-96.
35. Herd, R. M., Johnston, D. J., Moore, K., Graser, H-U. and Arthur, P. F. 2004b. Using plasma IGF-I concentration for genetic improvement of feed efficiency in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 82 (Suppl.): 378-379.
36. Herd, R. M., Oddy, V. H. and Richardson, E. C. 2004c. Biological basis for variation in residual feed intake in beef cattle. 1. Review of potential mechanisms. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 44: 423-430.
37. Herd, R. M., Richardson, E. C., Hegarty, R. S., Woodgate, R. T., Archer, J. A. and Arthur, P. F. 1998. Pasture intake by high versus low net feed efficient Angus cows. Anim. Prod. Aust. 22: 137-40.
38. Hermesch, S. 2004. Genetic improvement of lean meat growth and feed efficiency in pigs. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 44: 383-391.
39. Johnston, D. J., Herd, R. M., Kadeh, M. J., Graser, H-U., Arthur, P. F. and Archer, J. A. 2002. Evidence of IGF-I as a genetic predictor of feed efficiency traits in beef cattle. Proc. 7th Wld. Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod. 31: 257-260.
40. Juszczuk-Kubiak, E., Sakowski, T., Flisikowski, K., Wicińska, K., Oprza̧dek, J. and Rosochacki, S. J. 2004. Bovine μ-calpain (CAPN1) gene: new SNP within intron 14. J. Appl. Genet. 45: 457-460.
41. Kambadur, R., Sharma, M., Smith, T. P. and Bass, J. J. 1997. Mutations in myostatin (GDF8) in double-muscled Belgian White-Blue and Piedmontese cattle. Genome Res. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York. 7 (9): 910-916.
42. Kearney, G. A., Knee, B. W., Graham, J. F. and Knott, S. A. 2004. The length of test required to measure liveweight change when testing for feed efficiency in cattle. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 44: 411-414.
43. Kelly, M. J., Kinghorn, B. P. and Meszaros, S. A. 2003. Optimising recording structures of a beef cattle breeding scheme. Proc. Assoc. Adv. Anim. Breed. Genet. 15: 298-301.
44. Kennedy, B. W., van der Werf, J. H. J. and Meuwissen, T. H. E. 1993. Genetic and statistical properties of residual feed intake. J. Anim. Sci. 71: 3239-3250.
45. Koch, R. M., Gregory, K. E. and Cundiff, L. V. 1982. Critical analysis of selection methods and experiments in beef cattle and consequences upon selection programs applied. Proc. 2nd World. Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod. 5: 514-526.
46. Lee, B. 1993. Nutrition and management of feedlot cattle. Pages 61-69 in D. Farrell, ed. Recent advances in animal nutrition in Australia. University of New England, Australia.
47. Lee, G. J., Atkins, K. D. and Swan, A. A. 2002. Pasture intake and digestibility by young and non-breeding adult sheep: the extent of genetic variation and relationships with productivity. Livest. Prod. Sci. 73: 185-198.
48. Liefers, S. C., te Pas, M. F. W., Veerkamp, R. F. and van der Lende. 2002. Associations between leptin gene polymorphisms and production, live weight, energy balance, feed intake, and fertility in Holstein heifers. J. Diary Sci. 85: 1633-1638.
49. Luiting, P. 1991. The value of feed consumption data for breeding in laying hens. PhD thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, the Netherlands.
50. Moore, K. L., Johnston, D. J., Herd, R. M. and Graser, H-U. 2003. Genetic and non-genetic effects on plasma insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentration and production traits in Angus cattle. Proc. Assoc. Advmt. Anim. Breed. Genet. 15: 222-226.
51. National Research Council. 1996. Nutrient requirements for beef cattle. 7th revised edition. National Academic Press, National Academy of Science, Washington, DC.
52. Nkrumah, J. D., Basarab, J. A., Price, M. A., Okine, E. K., Ammoura, A., Guercio, S., Hansen, C., Li, C., Benkel, B., Murdoch, B. and Moore, S. S. 2004a. Different measures of energetic efficiency and their phenotypic relationships with growth, feed intake, and ultrasound and carcass merit in hybrid cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 82: 2451-2459.
53. Nkrumah, J. D., Li, C., Basarab, J. A., Guercio, S., Meng, Y., Murdoch, B., Hansen, C. and Moore, S. S. 2004b. Association of a single nucleotide polymorphism in the bovine leptin gene with feed intake, feed efficiency, growth, feeding behaviour, carcass quality and body composition. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 84: 211-219.
54. Nkrumah, J. D., Li, C., Yu, J., Hansen, C., Keisler, D. H. and Moore, S. S. 2005. Polymorphisms in the bovine leptin promoter associated with serum leptin concentration, growth, feed intake, feeding behavior, and measures of carcass merit. J. Anim. Sci. 83: 20-28.
55. Nkrumah, J. D., Okine, E. K., Mathison, G. W., Guercio, S., Hansen, C., Basarab, J. A., Price, M. A., Li, C. and Moore, S. S. 2004c. Relationship between residual feed intake and metabolic rate in growing hybrid cattle. Proc. Joint Conference of Can. Soc. Agron., Can. Soc. Anim. Sci. and Can. Soc. Soil. Sci., Edmonton, AB. July 2004. p. 159.
56. Okine, E. K., Basarab, J., Baron, V. and Price, M. A. 2001. Net feed efficiency in young growing cattle: III Relationship to methane and manure production. In Abstracts of Presentations and Posters, Agricultural Institute of Canada, 2001 Conference, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON. Vol. 16.
57. Page, B. T., Casas, E., Heaton, M. P., Cullen, N. G., Hyndman, D. L., Morris, C. A., Crawford, A. M., Wheeler, T. L., Koohmaraie, M., Keele, J. W. and Smith, T. P. L. 2002. Evaluation of single nucleotide polymorphisms in CAPN1 for association with meat tenderness in cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 80: 3077-3085.
58. Pitchford, W. S. 2004. Genetic improvement of feed efficiency of beef cattle: What lessons can we learn from other species? Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 44: 371-382.
59. Pitchford, W. S., Fenton, M. L., Kister, A. J. and Bottema, C. D. K. 2002. QTL for feed intake and associated traits. Proc. 7th Wld. Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod. 31: 253-256.
60. Pitel, F., Feve, K., Vignal, A., Tixier-Boichard, M., Coville, J.-L. and Bordas, A. 2001. QTL detection using bulked segregant analysis with microsatellite or AFLP® markers in layers divergently selected for residual food consumption. Br. Poult. Sci. 42 (Suppl. 1): S27.
61. Richardson, E. C. and Herd, R. M. 2004. Biological basis for variation in residual feed intake in beef cattle. 2. Synthesis of results following divergent selection. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 44: 431-440.
62. Schenkel, F. S., Miller, S. P., Jiang, Z. H., Mandell, I. B., Ye, X., Li, H. and Wilton, J. W. 2004a. Associations of a single nucleotide polymorphism in calpastatin (CAST) gene with carcass and meat quality traits in beef cattle. Proc. Can. Soc. Anim. Sci. Annual Meeting, August 2004, Edmonton, AB.
63. Schenkel, F. S., Miller, S. P. and Wilton, J. W. 2004b. Genetic parameters and breed differences for feed efficiency, growth, and body composition traits of young beef bulls. Can J. Anim. Sci. 84: 177-185.
64. Schmidt, T. M., Boisvert, R. N. and Tauer, L. W. 2001. Measuring the financial risks of New York dairy producers. J. Dairy Sci. 84: 411-420.
65. Snowder, G. D. and Van Vleck, L. D. 2003. Estimates of genetic parameters and selection strategies to improve the economic efficiency of postweaning growth in lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 81: 2704-2713.
66. Świtoński, M. 2002. Molecular genetics in beef cattle breeding - a review. Anim. Sci. Papers and Reports. (Inst. Genet. Anim. Breed., Jastrzȩbiec, Poland) 20 (Suppl. 1): 7-18.
67. Theis, C. M., Carstens, G. E., Hollenbeck, R. J., Kurz, M. W., Bryan, T. M., Slay, L. J., Randel, R. D. and Welsh, T. H. 2002. Residual feed intake in beef steers: I. Correlations with haematological parameters and serum cortisol concentrations. J. Anim. Sci. 80 (Suppl. 2): 127.
68. Tixier-Boichard, M., Bordas, A., Renand, G. and Bidanel, J. P. 2002. Residual food consumption as a tool to unravel genetic components of food intake. 7th Wld. Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod. 31: 213-220.
69. US-EPA 2005. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-2003. Document EPA 430-R-05-003. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
70. Veerkamp, R. F. and Emmans, G. C. 1995. Sources of genetic variation in energetic efficiency of dairy cows. Livest. Prod. Sci. 44: 87-97.
71. Veerkamp, R. F., Emmans, G. C., Cromie, A. R. and Simm, G. 1995. Variance components for residual feed intake in dairy cows. Livest. Prod. Sci. 41: 111-120.
72. Veerkamp, R. F. and Koenen, P. C. 1999. Genetics of food intake, liveweight, condition score and energy balance. Pages 63-73 in Metabolic stress in dairy cows. Occasional Publication No. 24. British Society of Animal Science, Edinburgh, Scotland.
73. Wood, B. J., Archer, J. A. and van der Werf, J. H. J. 2002. Genetic and economic evaluation of the use of IGF-1 as an indirect selection criterion in beef cattle. Proc. 7th Wld. Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod. 29: 541-544.
74. Wood, B. J., Archer, J. A. and van der Werf, J. H. J. 2004. Response to selection in beef cattle using IGF-I as a selection criterion for residual feed intake under different Australian breeding objectives. Livest. Prod. Sci. 91: 69-81.