Fugitive literature in the cross hairs: An examination of bibliographic control and access

Collection Management

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 75-86

  Denda, Kayo ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Access; Bibliographic control; Feminism; Fugitive literature; Grey literature; Women's studies

Indexed keywords

EID: 28044453754     PISSN: 01462679     EISSN: 15452549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J105v27n02_07     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aked, Michael J., 1996. Building and maintaining an academic library pamphlet collection. Collection Building, 15:22–31.
2. Alberani, Vilma, and De Castro, Paola. 2001. Grey literature from the York seminar (UK) of 1978 to the year 2000. Inspel, 35:236–47.
3. Allen, Barbara. 1992. The information file in academic libraries:An unexploited resource. Collection Management, 16(3):53–79.
4. Anderson, Byron. 2001. Grey literature and electronic publishing. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 19(2):81–5.
5. Ariel, Joan, ed. 1987. Building Women's Studies Collections:A Resource Guide, Middletown, CN:Choice.
6. Auger, Charles P., 1998. Information Sources in Grey Literature, New Providence:Bowker/Saur.
7. Blanchi, Christophe, and Petrone, Jason. 2001. Distributed interoperable metadata registry. D-Lib Magazine, 7(12) December [Online]. Available http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december01/blanchi/12blanchi.html [November 24, 2002]
8. Braun, Janice, and Hopkins, Lola Raykovic. 1995. Collection-level cataloging, indexing, and preservation of the Hoover Institution pamphlet collection of revolutionary change in twentieth century Europe. Technical Services Quarterly, 12(4):1–9.
9. Cornell University. 2001. CTS Procedure #1:Collection-Level Cataloging [Online]. Available http://www.library.cornell.edu/cts/1colecat.htm October 21, 2002
10. Gelfand, Julia. 1998. Teaching and exposing grey literature:What the information profession needs to know-examples from the sciences. Collection Building, 17:159–66.
11. Gelfand, Julia M., 1997. Academic libraries and collection development implications for grey literature. Publishing Research Quarterly, 13(2):15–23.
12. Gelfand, Julia M., 2000. Grey literature poses new challenges for research libraries. Collection Management, 24(1/2):137–47.
13. Gerhard, Kristin H., Su, Mila C., and Rubens, Charlotte C., 1998. An empirical examination of subject headings for women's studies core materials. College & Research Libraries, 59:131–8.
14. Haber, Barbara. Women's studies resources for college and research libraries. New Horizons for Academic Libraries:Papers presented at the First National Conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries. November8–111978, Boston, MA. Edited by:Stuart, R. D., and Johnson, R., pp.460–6. New York:Saur.
15. Haber, Barbara. 1980. The new feminism:implications for librarians. RQ, 20:76–8.
16. Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives, Ithaca, NY:Cornell.
17. Hodgson, Tom, and Garoogian, Andrew. 1981. Special collections in college libraries:The vertical file. Reference Services Review, 9(3):77–84.
18. Library of Congress Cataloging Policy and Support Office Home Page. 1998. Appendix J Collection Level Cataloging, [Online]. Available http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/app-coll.html [October 27, 2002]
19. Lovenburg, Susan L., and Stoss, Frederick W., 1988. The fugitive literature of acid rain:Making use of non-conventional information sources in a vertical file. Reference Services Review, 16(1–2):95–104.
20. Malina, Danusia, and Nutt, Diane. 2000. Grey literature is a feminist issue:Women's knowledge and the net. The International Journal on Grey Literature, 1(1):18–27.
21. Matsumoto, Valerie. 1996. “Reflections of oral history:Research in a Japanese American community”. In Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork, Edited by:Wolf, Diane L., 160–9. Boulder, CO:Westview.
22. Muswazi, Paiki. 2001. Illusion of internet grey literature boon for developing nations:A case study. Inspel, 35:217–25.
23. Neuhaus, Chris. 1998. Browsers choice:A comparative use study of traditional and electronic vertical files. Reference Services Review, 26:79–86.
24. Parikh, Neel, and Broidy, Ellen. 1982. Women's issues:The library response. Wilson Library Bulletin, 57:295–9.
25. Rivera, Lassén, Irma, Ana, and Kebler, Elizabeth Crespo. 2001. Documentos del Feminismo en Puerto Rico:Facsímiles de la Historia. Vol. 1, 1970–1979, San Juan:Editorial de la Universidad de Puerto Rico.
26. Rutgers University, Women's & Gender Studies Department. 2001. Ph.D. Program Approval Document New Brunswick, NJ
27. Schneider, Josephine M., 1951. The pamphlet file in the school and college library. Wilson Library Bulletin, 25:685–7.
28. Searing, Susan E., 1986. Feminist library services:The women's studies librar-ian-at-large, University of Wisconsin system. In Women's Collections:Libraries, Archives, and Consciousness edited by Suzanne Hildenbrand. Special Collections, 3(3–4):149–162.
29. Still, Julie. 1988. The vertical file in academic libraries. Show-Me Libraries, 39:36–8.
30. Yale University Library. 1998. Rare Book Team Collection-Level Cataloging [Online]. Available http://www.library.yale.edu/cataloging/rarebookteam/coll_lev.html [October 21, 2002]
31. Witherow, Millicent. 1987. Ephemera. Women's Studies International Forum, 10(3):291–297.