Relationship among MRTA, DXA, and QUS revisited

Journal of Clinical Densitometry

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 396-403

  Kiebzak, Gary M ^a   Ambrose, Catherine G ^b  

^a ST LUKE S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

BMD; Bone strength; DXA; MRTA; QUS; SOS; Transverse bending stiffness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BONE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORTICAL BONE; DATA ANALYSIS; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; ULNA; YOUNG MODULUS;

EID: 28044453748     PISSN: 10946950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1385/JCD:8:4:396     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Martin RB 1991 Determinants of the mechanical properties of bones. J Biomech 24 Suppl 1:79-88.
2. Steele CR, Zhou L-J, Guido D, Marcus R, Heinrichs WL, Cheema C. 1988 Non-invasive determination of ulnar stiffness from mechanical response: in vivo comparison of stiffness and bone mineral content in humans. J Biomech Eng. 110:87-96.
3. McCabe F, Zhou L-J, Steele CR, Marcus R. 1991 Non-invasive assessment of ulnar bending stiffness in women. J Bone Miner Res 6:53-59.
4. Myburgh KH, Zhou L-J, Steele CR, Arnaud S, Marcus R. 1992 In vivo assessment of forearm bone mass and ulnar bending stiffness in healthy men. J Bone Miner Res 7:1345-1350.
5. Roberts SG, Hutchinson TM, Arnaud SB, Kiralti BJ, Martin RB, Steele CR. 1996 Noninvasive determination of bone mechanical properties using vibration response: a refined model and validation in vivo. J Biomech 29(1):91-98.
6. Kiebzak GM, Box JH, Box P 1999 Decreased ulnar bending in osteoporotic Caucasian women. J Clin Densitom 2(2):143-152.
7. Hans D, Arlot ME, Schott AM, Roux JP, Kotzki PO, Meunier PJ. 1995 Do ultrasound measurements on the os calci reflect more the bone microarchitecture than the bone mass?: A two-dimensional histomorphometric study. Bone 16 (3):295-300.
8. Cortet B, Boutry N, Dubois P, Legroux-Gerot I, Cotton A, Marchandise X. 2004 Does quantitative ultrasound of bone reflect more bone mineral density than bone microarchitecture? Calcif Tissue Int 74:80-87.
9. Prevrhal S, Fuerst T, Fan B, et al. 2001. Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia depends on both cortical density and thickness. Osteoporosis Int 12:28-34.
10. Nicholson PHF, Muller R, Lowet G, et al. 1998 Do quantitative ultrasound measurements reflect structure independently of density in human vertebral cancellous bone? Bone 23 (5):424-431.
11. Nicholson PHF, Muller R, Cheng XG, et al. 2001 Quantitative ultrasound and trabecular architecture in the human calcanies. J Bone Miner Res 16:1886-1892.
12. Sievanen H, Cheng S, Ollikainen S, Uusi-Rasi, K. 2001 Ultrasound velocity and cortical bone characteristics in vivo. Osteoporosis Int 12:399-405.
13. Sakata S, Barkmann R, Lochmuller EM, Heller H, Gluer CC. 2004 Assessing bone status beyond BMD: Evaluation of bone geometry and porosity by quantitative ultrasound of human finger phalanges. J Bone Mineral Res 19 (6):924-930.
14. Mehta SS, Oz OK, Antich PP. 1998 Bone elasticity and ultrasound velocity are affected by subtle changes in the organic matrix. J Bone Miner Res 13 91):114-121.
15. Njeh CF, Fuerst T, Diessek E, Genant HK. 2001 Is quantitative ultrasound dependent on bone structure? A reflection. Osteoporosis Int 12(1):1-15.
16. Toyras J, Kroger H, Javelin JS. 1999 Bone properties as estimated by mineral density, ultrasound attenuation and velocity. Bone 25 (6):725-731.
17. Lee SC, Coan BS, Bouxsein ML. 1997 Tibial ultrasound velocity measured in situ predicts the material properties of tibial cortical bone. Bone 21 (1):119-125.
18. Hodgskinson R, Njeh CF, Currey JD, Langton CM. 1997 The ability of ultrasound velocity to predict the stiffness of cancellous bone in vitro. Bone 21:183-190.
19. Njeh C, Kuo CW, Langton CM, Atrah H, Boivin CM .1997 Prediction of human femoral bone strength using ultrasound velocity and BMD: an in vitro study. Osteoporosis Int 7:471-477
20. Hamdy RC, Petak SA, Lenchik L. 2002 Which dual x-ray absorptiometry skeletal sites and regions of interest should be used to determine the diagnosis of osteoporosis? J Clin Densitom 5 (suppl 1): S11-17.
21. Njeh CF, Hans D, Wu C, et al. 1999 An in vitro investigation of the dependence on sample thickness of the speed of sound along the specimen. Med Engineering Physics 21:651-659.
22. Zar JH. 1984 Biostatistical Analysis 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
23. Hudelmaier M, Kuhn V, Lochmuller EM, et al. 2004 Can geometry-based parameters from pQCT and material parameters from quantitative ultrasound (QUS) improve the prediction of radial bone strength over that by bone mass (DXA)? Osteoporos Int 15:375-381.
24. Muller ME, Webber CE, Bouxsein ML. 2003 Predicting the failure load of the distal radius. Osteoporos Int 14:345-352.
25. Damilakis J, Papadokostakis G, Vrahoriti H, et al. 2003 Ultrasond velocity through the cortex of phalanges, radius, and tibia in normal and osteoporotic women using a new multisite quantitative ultrasound device. Invest Radiol 38 (94):207-211.
26. Knapp KM, Blake GM, Spector TD, Fogelman I. 2001 Multisite quantitative ultrasound: precision, age- and menopause-related changes, fracture discrimination, and T-score equivalence with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporo Int 12:456-464.
27. Antich PP, Anderson JA, Ashman RB, et al. 1991 Measurement of mechanical properties of bone material in vitro by ultrasound reflection: methodology and comparison with ultrasound transmission. Bone Miner Res 6 (4):417-426.
28. Barkmann R, Kantorovich E, Singal C, et al. 2000 A new method for quantitative ultrasound measurements at multiple skeletal sites. J Clin Dens 3 (1):1-7.
29. Keller TS, Mao Z, Spengler DM. 1990 Young's modulus, bending strength and tissue physical properties of human compact bone. J Ortho Res 8:592-603.
30. Rho JY. 1996 An ultrasonic method for measuring the elastic properties of human tibial cortical and cancellous bone. Ultrasonics 34 (8):777-783.
31. Hagaman JR, Ambrose WW, Hirsch PF, Kiebzak GM. 1991 Age-related changes in rat trabecular, endosteal and cortical bone demonstrated with scanning electron microscopy. Cells and Materials Supplement 1:37-46.
32. Djokoto J, Waldman SD, Grynpas MD, Cheung AM. 2004 Relationship among MRTA, DXA, and QUS. J Clin Dens 7(4):448-456.
33. Kiebzak GM, Martin S, Ambrose CG. 2004 Comparing precision values: impact of study design and statistical techniques. J Clin Dens 7(2):248.