Pragmatism and civic education reform in the czech republic

Educational Forum

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 260-270

  Hlebowitsh, Peter S ^a   Hamot, Gregory E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28044441197     PISSN: 00131725     EISSN: 19388098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00131729908984426     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Butts, R. F. 1980. The revival of civic learning: A rationale for citizenship education in American schools. Bloomington, Ind.: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
2. Center for Civic Education. 1996. Civitas: An international civic exchange program. Calabasas: Calif.: Center for Civic Education.
3. Dewey, J. 1902. The child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Dewey, J. 1916. Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan.
5. Dewey, J. 1938. Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
6. Directorate for Education, Labor and Social Affairs. 1996. Reviciv of school education policy in the Czech Republic: Examiners' report and questions. Paris, France: Dostalova, R. 1993. Humanistic and democratic goals in the Czech secondary school: Aims and outlooks. Prague, Czech Republic: ERIC ED 372 021.
7. Dostalova, R. 1995. The roots and recent goals in education for democracy in the Czech Republic. Paper presented at the Civitas Conference, Bonn, Germany.
8. Hamot, G. 1997. Civic education for the Czech Republic: Curriculum reform for democratic citizenship. Bloomington, Lnd.: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Stud-ies/Social Science Education. ERIC ED 410 178.
9. Hlebowitsh, P. S. 1995. Interpretations of the Tyler rationale. Journal of Curriculum Studies 27(1): 89-94.
10. James, W. 1909. The meaning of truth, a sequel to 'Pragmatis.' New York: Longmans, Green, and Co.
11. Kliebard, H. 1995. The Tyler rationale revisited. Journal of Curriculum Studies 27(1): 81-88.
12. Mitter, W. 1996. Democracy and education in central and eastern Europe. In Can democracy be taught?, ed. A. Oldenquist, 129-54. Bloomington, lnd.: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
13. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 1996. The Czech Republic. Paris, France: OECD.
14. Patrick, J. 1996. Principles of democracy for the education of citizens in former communist countries of central and eastern Europe. In Building civic education for democracy in Poland, ed. R. C. Remy and J. Strzemieczny, 1-22. Bloomington, Lnd.: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education. ERIC ED 396 986.
15. Prucha, J. 1992. Trends in Czechoslovak education. In Recent trends in east European education, ed. W. Mitter, M. Weiss, and V. Schaefer, 83-102. Frankfurt, Germany: Institute for International Education Research
16. Remy, R. C., and J. Strzemieczny, eds. 1996. Building civic education for democracy in Poland. Bloomington, lnd.: Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education. ERIC ED 396 986.
17. Smith, E. R., and R. W. Tyler. 1942. Appraising and recording student progress. New York: Harper and Brothers.
18. Tanner, D., and L. Tanner. 1990. The history of the school curriculum. New York: Macmillan.
19. Tyler, R. W. 1949. The basic principles of curriculum and instruction: Syllabus for Education 360. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.