Text-encoding, theories of the text, and the 'work-site'

Literary and Linguistics Computing

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 425-435

  Eggert, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28044437335     PISSN: 02681145     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqi050     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aarseth, E. (1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
2. Berrie, P., Eggert, P., Barwell, G., and Tiffin, C. (forthcoming 2006). Authenticating electronic editions. In Burnard, L., O'Brien O'Keeffe, K., and Unsworth, J. (eds), Electronic Textual Editing. New York: Modern Language Association, pp. 263-70.
3. Buzzetti, D. (2002). Digital representation and the text model. New Literary History, 33: 61-88.
4. Caton, P. (2004). Form, content, and the philosopher's stone. Paper presented at the Sixteenth Joint International Conference of the Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing and the Association for Computers and the Humanities. Abstract in ALLC/ACH 2004: Computing and Multilingual, Multicultural Heritage, The 16th Joint International Conference, Göteborg University, 11-16 June 2004, Conference Abstracts. Göteborg: Göteborg University, pp. 40-2.
5. Dahlström, M. (2000). Drowning by versions. Human IT, 4: 7-38.
6. De Rose, S., Durand, D., Mylonas, E., and Renear, A. (1990). What Is Text, Really?. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 1.2: 3-26.
7. Eggert, P. (1998). The work unravelled. TEXT, 11: 41-60.
8. Eggert, P. (2005). What e-textuality has to tell us about texts. Unpublished paper given to the Society for Textual Scholarship conference, March 2005, New York.
9. Hayles, K. (2003a). What cybertext theory can't do. Electronic Book Review, posted 15 February 2001, modified 8 March 2003. http://www.electronicbookreview.com (accessed 21 April 2004).
10. Hayles, K. (2003b). Translating media: Why we should rethink textuality. Yale Journal of Criticism, 16: 263-90.
11. Huitfeldt, C. (1995). Multi-dimensional texts in a one-dimensional medium. Computers and the Humanities, 28: 235-41.
12. Ingarden, R. (1931). The Literary Work of Art. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Translated 1973.
13. Kirschenbaum, M. (2002). Editing the interface: Textual studies and first generation electronic objects. TEXT, 14: 15-51.
14. Kirschenbaum, M. (2003). Materiality and matter and stuff: What electronic texts are made of. Electronic Book Review, posted 1 October 2001, modified 30 November 2003. http://www.electronicbookreview.com (accessed 21 April 2004).
15. McGann, J. (2001). Radiant Textuality: Literature after the World Wide Web. New York: Palgrave.
16. Pichler, A. (1995). Transcriptions, texts and interpretation. In Johannessen, K. and Nordenstam, T. (eds), Culture and Value: Philosophy and the Cultural Sciences. Kirchberg am Wechsel: The Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society. pp. 690-95.
17. Renear, A. (1997). Out of praxis: Three (meta)theories of textuality. In Sutherland, K. (ed), Electronic Text: Investigations in Method and Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 107-26.
18. Renear, A. (2004). Theory restored. Paper presented at the Sixteenth Joint International Conference of the Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing and the Association for Computers and the Humanities. Abstract in ALLC/ACH 2004: Computing and Multilingual, Multicultural Heritage, The 16th Joint International Conference, Göteborg University, 11-16 June 2004, Conference Abstracts. Göteborg: Göteborg University, pp. 110-12.
19. Robinson, P. (2003). Where we are with scholarly editions, and where we want to be. Unpublished MS dated December 2003.
20. Ryan, M-L. (1999). Cyberspace, virtuality, and the text. In Ryan, M-L. (ed), Cyberspace Textuality: Computer Technology and Literary Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 78-107.
21. Shillingsburg, P. (2004). Script acts from Gutenburg to Google. Unpublished MS dated 5 March 2004. Forthcoming, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. TEI (1994). Sperberg-McQueen, C. and Burnard, L. (eds), Guidelines for Electronic Encoding and Interchange. Chicago: Text Encoding Initiative.
23. William Blake Archive. Eaves, M., Essick, R., and Viscomi, J. (eds). www.blakearchive.org (accessed 7 June 2005).