Neuro exceptionalism?

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 36-38

  Schick, Ari ^a,b  

^a YESHIVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HASTINGS CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27944509163     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160590960410     Document Type: Note

References (9)

1. Bloom, P. 2004. The duel between body and soul. The New York Times, September 10:A25.
2. Bolstad, B. M., F. Collin, K. M. Simpson, et al. 2004. Experimental design and low-level analysis of microarray data. International Review of Neurobiology 60:2558.
3. Fletcher, S. W., and J. G. Elmore. 2003. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine 348(17): 1672-80.
4. Greely, H. T. 2004. Prediction, litigation, privacy, and property: Some possible legal and social implications of advances in neuroscience. In Neuroscience and the law: Brain, mind, and the scales of justice, ed. B. Garland, 114-156. New York and Washington, DC: Dana Press.
5. Guyer, R. L., and J. D. Moreno. 2004. Slouching toward policy: Lazy bioethics and the perils of science fiction. The American Journal of Bioethics 4(4): W14-W17.
6. Illes, J., and E. Racine. 2005. Imaging or imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics. The American Journal of Bioethics 5(2): 5-18.
7. Simon, R., M. D. Radmacher, K. Dobbin, et al. 2003. Pitfalls in the use of DNA microarray data for diagnostic and prognostic classification. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 95(1): 14-18.
8. Suter, S. M. 2001. The allure and peril of genetics exceptionalism: Do we need special genetics legislation? Washington University Law Quarterly 79(3): 669-748.
9. Turner, L. 2003. The tyranny of 'genethics.' Nature Biotechnology 21(11): 1282.