Genetic structure inside a declining red oak community in old-growth forest

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 96, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 627-634

  Aldrich, P R ^a,b   Glaubitz, J C ^a   Parker, G R ^a   Rhodes Jr , O E ^a   Michler, C H ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BENEDICTINE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BOTTLENECK POPULATION; DEMOGRAPHY; FOREST; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC DISTANCE; GENETIC TRAIT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; GEOGRAPHIC ORIGIN; MOLECULAR GENETICS; OAK; PLANT GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECIES HABITAT; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; UNITED STATES;

FORESTRY; GENETICS, POPULATION; INDIANA; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; QUERCUS; VARIATION (GENETICS);

QUERCUS; QUERCUS RUBRA;

EID: 27944508323     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: 14657333     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esi115     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Abrams MD, 1992. Fire and the development of oak forests. Bioscience 42:346-353.
2. Abrams MD, 2003. Where has all the white oak gone? Bioscience 53:927-939.
3. Aldrich PR, Jagtap M, Michler CH, and Romero-Severson J, 2003a. Amplification of North American red oak microsatellite markers in European white oaks and Chinese chestnut. Silvae Genet 52:176-179.
4. Aldrich PR, Michler CH, Sun W, and Romero-Severson J, 2002. Microsatellite markers for northern red oak (Fagaceae: Quercus rubra). Mol Ecol Notes 2:472-474.
5. Aldrich PR, Parker GR, Michler CH, and Romero-Severson J, 2003b. Whole-tree silvic identifications and the microsatellite genetic structure of a red oak species complex in Indiana old-growth forest. Can J Forest Res 33:2228-2237.
6. Aldrich PR, Parker GR, Romero-Severson J, and Michler CH, 2005. Confirmation of oak recruitment failure in Indiana old-growth forest: 75 years of data. Forest Science 51:406-416.
7. Aldrich PR, Parker GR, Ward JS, and Michler CH, 2003c. Spatial dispersion of trees in an old-growth temperate hardwood forest over 60 years of succession. Forest Ecol Manag 180:475-491.
8. Austerlitz F and Smouse PE, 2001a. Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. II. Relation between fft, pollen dispersal, and inter-female distance. Genetics 157:851-857.
9. Austerlitz F and Smouse PE, 2001b. Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. III. Impact of within-population structure. Genetical Research 78:271-280.
10. Bacilieri R, Labbe T, and Kremer A, 1994. Intraspecific genetic structure in a mixed population of Quercus petraea (Matt.) Leibl and Q. robur L. Heredity 73:130-141.
11. Berg EE and Hamrick JL, 1994. Spatial and genetic structure of two sandhills oaks: Quercus laevis and Quercus margaretta (Fagaceae). Am J Bot 81:7-14.
12. Blouin MS, 2003. DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations. Trends Ecol Evol 18:503-511.
13. Buchert GP, Rajora OP, Hood JV, and Dancik BP, 1997. Effects of harvesting on genetic diversity in old-growth eastern white pine in Ontario, Canada. Conserv Biol 11:747-758.
14. Burns RM and Honkala BH, 1990. Silvics of North America. USDA Forest Service, agriculture handbook 654. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture.
15. Chung MY and Chung MG, 2002. Fine-scale genetic structure in populations of Quercus variabilis (Fagaceae) from southern Korea. Can J For Res 80:1034-1041.
16. Chung MY, Nason J, Chung MG, Kim K-J, Park C-W, Sun B-Y, and Pak J-H, 2002. Landscape-level spatial genetic structure in Quercus acutissima (Fagaceae). Amer J Bot 89:1229-1236.
17. Cottrell JE, Munro RC, Tabbener HE, Milner AD, Forrest, GI, and Lowe AJ, 2003. Comparison of fine-scale genetic structure using nuclear microsatellites within two British oakwoods differing in population history. Forest Ecol Manag 176:287-303.
18. Darley-Hill S and Johnson WC, 1981. Acorn dispersal by the blue jay (Cyanositta cristatta). Oecologia 50:231-232.
19. Epperson BK, 1990b. Spatial autocorrelation of genotypes under directional selection. Genetics 124:757-771.
20. Fore SA, Hickey RJ, Vankat JL, Guttman SI, and Schaefer RL, 1992. Genetic structure after forest fragmentation: a landscape ecology perspective on Acer saccharum. Can J Bot 70:1659-1668.
21. Frelich LE and Lorimer CG, 1985. Current and predicted long-term effects of deer browsing in hemlock forests in Michigan, USA. Biol Conserv 34:99-120.
22. Geburek T and Tripp-Knowles P, 1994. Genetic architecture in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa (Fagaceae), inferred by means of spatial autocorrelation analysis. Pl Syst Evol 189:63-74.
23. Glaubitz JC, Murrell JC, and Moran GF, 2003. Effects of native forest regeneration practices on genetic diversity in Eucalyptus consideniana. Theor Appl Genet 107:422-431.
24. Goheen JR and Swihart RK, 2003. Food-hoarding behavior of gray squirrels and North American red squirrels in the central hardwoods region: implications for forest regeneration. Can J Zool 81:1636-1639.
25. Gomory D, 1992. Effect of stand origin on the genetic diversity of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) populations. Forest Ecol Manag 54:215-223.
26. Hamilton WD, 1964a. The genetical evolution of social behavior. J Theor Biol 7:1-16.
27. Hamilton WD, 1964b. The genetical evolution of social behavior, II. J Theor Biol 7:17-52.
28. Hamrick JL, Murawski DA, and Nason JD, 1993. The influence of seed dispersal mechanisms on the genetic structure of tropical tree populations. Vegetatio 107/108:281-297.
29. Hardy O and Vekemans X, 2002. SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyze spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes 2:618-620.
30. Huebner CD, 2003. Vulnerability of oak-dominated forests in West Virginia to invasive exotic plants: temporal and spatial patterns of nine exotic species using herbarium records and land classification data. Castanea 68:1-14.
31. Jensen RJ, 1995. Identifying oaks: the hybrid problem. J Int Oak Soc 6:47-54.
32. Kimura M, Crow J, 1964. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49:725-738.
33. Knapp EE, Goedde MA, and Rice KJ, 2001. Pollen-limited reproduction in blue oak: implications for wind pollination in fragmented populations. Oecologia 128:48-55.
34. Laughlin K, 1963. Quercus x riparia Laughlin Kansas City oak. Phytologia 9:101-107.
35. Laughlin K, 1964. Quarais x columnaris Laughlin Caldwell oak. Phytologia 9:488-495.
36. Lewis PO and Zaykin D, 2001. Genetic Data Analysis: computer program for the analysis of allelic data. Version 1.0 (d16c). http://lewis.eeb.uconn.edu/ lewishome/software.html (visited Jan 7, 2002).
37. Linhart YB, Mitton JB, Sturgeon KB, and Davis ML, 1981. Genetic variation in space and time in a population of ponderosa pine. Heredity 46:407-426.
38. Lorimer CG, 1993. Causes of the oak regeneration problem. USDA For Serv Gen Tech Rep SE-84. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture; 25 p.
39. McGuire M, Stevens J, and Potter-Witter K, 1999. Assessing scarcity of the north central veneer log resource. North J Appl For 16:160-166.
40. Mitton JB, Latta RG, and Rehfeldt GE, 1997. The pattern of inbreeding in Washoe pine and survival of inbred progeny under optimal environmental conditions. Silvae Genet 46:215-219.
41. Montalvo AM, Conard SG, Conkle MT, and Hodgskiss PD, 1997. Population structure, genetic diversity, and clone formation in Quercus chrysolepis (Fagaceae). Amer J Bot 84:1553-1564.
42. Morsink WAG and Pratt PD, 1984. Shumard Oak, Quercus shumardii, in Essex County, Ontario. Can Field Nat 98:470-478.
43. Murcia C, 1995. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 10:58-62.
44. Neale DB, 1985. Genetic implications of shelterwood regeneration of Douglas-fir in southwest Oregon. Forest Sci 31:995-1005.
45. Nyland RD, 1992. Exploitation and greed in eastern hardwood forests. J Forest, 90:33-37.
46. Palmer EJ and Steyermark JA, 1935. Quercus x mutabilis Palmer & Steyerm. Ann Mo Bot Gard 22:521.
47. Parker GR and Leopold DJ, 1983. Replacement of Ulmus americana L. in a mature east-central Indiana woods. B Torrey Bot Club 110:482-488.
48. Parker GR, Leopold DJ, and Eichenberger JK, 1985. Tree dynamics in an old-growth, deciduous forest. Forest Ecol Manag 11:31-57.
49. Petty RO and Jackson MT, 1966. Plant communities. In: Natural features of Indiana (Lindsey AA, ed). Indianapolis: Indiana Academy of Science; 264-296.
50. Prentice B, 1927. Forest survey no. 1: Herbert Davis Forestry Farm. Unpublished report to the Department of Forestry and Conservation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
51. Pulliam HR, 1988. Sources, sinks and population regulation. Am Nat 132:652-661.
52. Queller DC and Goodnight KF, 1989. Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43:258-275.
53. Rajora OP, 1999. Genetic biodiversity impacts of silvicultural practices and phenotypic selection in white spruce. Theor Appl Genet 99:954-961.
54. Rajora OP and Pluhar SA, 2003. Genetic diversity impacts of forest fires, forest harvesting, and alternative reforestation practices in black spruce (Picea mariana). Theor Appl Genet 106:1203-1212.
55. Rajora OP, Rahman MH, Buchert GP, and Dancik BP, 2000. Microsatellite DNA analysis of genetic effects of harvesting in old-growth eastern white pine (Pinus strobes) in Ontario, Canada. Mol Ecol 9:339-348.
56. Raymond M and Rousset F, 1995a. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248-249.
57. Raymond M and Rousset F, 1995b. An exact test for population differentiation. Evolution 49:1280-1283.
58. Roberds JH and Conkle MT, 1984. Genetic structure in loblolly pine stands: allozyme variation in parents and progeny. Forest Sci 30:319-329.
59. Schmidtling RC and Hipkins V, 1998. Genetic diversity in longleaf pine (Pinus palustris): influence of historical and prehistorical events. Can J For Res 28:1135-1145.
60. Schwarzmann JF and Gerhold HD, 1991. Genetic structure and mating system of northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) in Pennsylvania. Forest Sci 37:1376-1389.
61. Simon JP, Payette Y, and Longpre MH, 1995. Comparative analysis of the genetic composition of canopy and juvenile sugar maple individuals (Acer saccharum) in an old-growth forest in southern Quebec as related to anthropogenic disturbance. Can J For Res 25:743-752.
62. Smith WB, Vissage JS, Darr DR, and Sheffield RM, 2001. Forest resources of the United States, 1997. Gen Tech Rept NC-219. St. Paul, MN: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station; 190 pp.
63. Smouse PE, Dyer RJ, Westfall RD, and Sork VL, 2001. Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. I. Male gamete heterogeneity among females. Evolution 55:260-271.
64. Sork VL, Davis FW, Smouse PE, Apsit VJ, Dyer RJ, Fernandez-M J, and Kuhn B, 2002. Pollen movement in declining populations of California Valley Oak, Quercus lobata: Where have all the fathers gone? Molecular Ecology 11:1657-1668.
65. Sork VL, Huang S, and Wiener E, 1993. Macrogeographic and fine-scale genetic structure in a North American oak species, Quercus rubra L. Ann Sci For 50(suppl.):261-270.
66. Spetich M, Parker G, and Gustafson E, 1997. Spatial and temporal relationships of old-growth and secondary forests in Indiana. Natural Areas Journal 17:118-130.
67. n - microsatellite loci from Quercus petraea. Plant Mol Biol 33:1093-1096.
68. Streiff R, Ducousso A, Lexer C, Steinkellner H, Gloessl J, and Kremer A, 1999. Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Molec Ecol 8:831-841.
69. Streiff R, Labbe T, Bacilieri R, Steinkellner H, Glossl J, and Kremer A, 1998. Within-population genetic structure in Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. assessed with isozymes and microsatellites. Molec Ecol 7:317-328.
70. Weir BS, 1996. Genetic Data Analysis II. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
71. Weir BS and Cockerham CC, 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358-1370.
72. Wright S, 1943. Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:114-138.
73. Wright S, 1946. Isolation by distance under diverse systems of mating. Genetics 31:39-59.