Difficult interactions between IRBs and investigators: Applications and solutions

Journal of Applied Communication Research

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 269-276

  Fitch, Kristine L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Human subjects research; Institutional review board

Indexed keywords

EID: 27944503882     PISSN: 00909882     EISSN: 14795752     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00909880500149486     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. American Association of University Professors. (2000). Protecting human beings: Institutional review boards and social science research. Retrieved April 11, 2005, from http://www.aaup.org/ statements/redbook/repirb.htm
2. Associated Press. (2003, August 3). "Monster study" still stings [Electronic version]. CBSNews.com. Retrieved January 18, 2005, from http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/08/06/health/ main566882.shtml
3. Fitch, K. (2005). Ethical and regulatory issues in ethnographic human subjects research. Retrieved April 15, 2004, from http://research.uiowa.edu/hso/ resources/ethnographic/
4. Miller, H. (1997, May). Stanley Milgram. Retrieved January 18, 2005, from http://www.muskingum. edu/~psych/psycweb/history/milgram.htm#Theory
5. Owen, T. (2003, July 12). When words hurt: Stuttering study story missed the mark [Electronic version]. Cedar Rapids Gazette. Retrieved January 18, 2005, from http://www.uiowa.edu/ ~cyberlaw/wj/crg-1-20030713.htm
6. The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. (2005). IRB forum. Retrieved April 11, 2005, from http:// www.irbforum.org/
7. Zimbardo, P. (1999-2005). Stanford prison experiment social psychology network. Retrieved January 18, 2005, from http://www.prisonexp.org/