The stages of change scale among Brazilian alcohol dependents

Addictive Disorders and their Treatment

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 161-165

  Figlie, Neliana Buzi ^a,d   Dunn, John ^b   Bazan, Jorge Luis ^c   Laranjeira, Ronaldo ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b ROYAL FREE AND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^d Rua Borges Lagoa   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Alcoholism; Factor analysis; Motivation; Validation studies

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTPATIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; UNIVERSITY;

EID: 27944500630     PISSN: 15315754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.adt.0000186366.77296.66     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. McConnaughy EA, Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. Stages of change in psychotherapy: measurement and samples profiles. Psychotherapy. 1983;20:368-375.
2. Pantalon MV, Nich C, Frankfurter T, et al. The URICA as a measure of motivation to change among treatment-seeking individuals with concurrent alcohol and cocaine problems. Psych Addict Behav. 2002;16:299-307.
3. Sutton S. Back to the drawing board? A review of applications of the transtheoretical model to substance abuse. Addiction. 2001;96:175-186.
4. Project MATCH Research Group. Matching alcoholism treatment to client heterogeneity: project MATCH post treatment drinking outcomes. J Stud Alcohol. 1997;58:7-29.
5. Carbonari JP, Diclemente CC. Using transtheoretical model profiles to differentiate levels of alcohol abstinence success. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68:810-817.
6. Hernadez-Avila CA, Burleson JA, Kranzler HR. Stage of change as a predictor of abstinence among alcohol-dependent subjects in pharmacotherapy trials. Subst Abus. 1998;19:81-91.
7. Jorge MR, Masur J. The use of the Short-Form Alcohol Dependence Data Questionnaire (SADD) in Brazilian Alcoholic Patients. Br J Addict. 1985;80:301-305.
8. Méndez EB. A Brazilian version of the AUDIT (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test). Unpublished master dissertation, Universidade Federal de Pelotas - Social Medicine Department Post-Graduate Program, 1999.
9. Tabakoff B. The WHO/ISBRA study on state and trait markers in alcoholism: progress report. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1996;20(8 Suppl):243A-247A.
10. Byrne BM. Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994.
11. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 3rd ed. New York: Harper Collins; 1996.
12. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Kenneth A, Bollen J, Long S, eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993:136-162.
13. Bentler PM, Bonnet DG. Significance test and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariate structures. Psychol Bull. 1980;88:588-606.
14. Marsh HW, Balla JR, McDonald RP. Goodness-of-flt indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: the effect of sample size. Psychol Bull. 1988;103:392-410.
15. Davidson R. Editorial and commentaries: Prochaska and DiClemente's model of change: a case-study? Br J Addict. 1992;87:821-835.
16. Davidson R. The Transtheoretical Model - a critical overview. In: Miller WR, Heather N, eds. Treating Addictive Behaviors. New York: Plenum Press; 1998:25-28.
17. Sutton S. Can "stages of change" provide guidance in the treatment of addictions? A critical examination of Prochaska and DiClemente's model. In: Edwards G, Dare C, eds. Psychotherapy, Psychological Treatments and the Addictions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1996:189-205.