Subject protection and the risk-benefit relationship

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 22-23

  Schonfeld, Toby L ^a   Brown, Joseph S ^a   Gordon, Bruce G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; ECONOMICS; ETHICS; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NOTE; PATIENT SELECTION; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SALARY AND FRINGE BENEFIT; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; PATIENT SELECTION; PREJUDICE; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; RISK-TAKING; SALARIES AND FRINGE BENEFITS;

EID: 27944500271     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160500245022     Document Type: Note

References (4)

1. Emanuel, E. J. 2005. Undue inducement: Nonsense on stilts? The American Journal of Bioethics 5(5): 9-13.
2. Gordon J., B., J. Brown, C. Kratochvil, T. Schonfeld, and E. Prentice. In press. Paying research subjects. In Institutional review board: Management and function (2nd ed), eds. R. Amdur and E. Bankert. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
3. McNiel, B. J., S. G. Pauker, H. C. Sox, Jr., and A. Traversky. 1982. On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. New England Journal of Medicine 306:1259-1262.
4. Wilson, T. D., C. E. Houston, K. M. Etling, and N. Brekke. 1996. A new look at the anchoring effect: Basic anchoring and its antecedents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 125:387-402.