Evaluation of genetic differentiation in bos indicus cattle breeds from marathwada region of india using microsatellite polymorphism

Animal Biotechnology

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 127-137

  Sodhi, M ^a   Mukesh, M ^a   Mishra, B P ^a   Mitkari, K R ^b   Prakash, B ^a   Ahlawat, S P S ^a  

^a NATIONAL BUREAU OF ANIMAL GENETIC RESOURCES   (India)

^b Marathwada Agriculture University   (India)

Author keywords

Genetic differentiation; Genetic diversity; Marathwada region; Microsatellite polymorphism; Zebu cattle breeds

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL CULTURE; CHROMOSOMES; GENES; STATISTICAL METHODS;

GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC DIVERSITY; MARATHWADA REGION; MICROSATELLITE POLYMORPHISM; ZEBU CATTLE BREEDS;

GENETIC ENGINEERING;

ANIMALIA; BOS INDICUS; BOS TAURUS;

DNA; MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CATTLE; CHEMISTRY; DNA SEQUENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; INDIA; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POPULATION GENETICS;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; CATTLE; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DNA; GENETICS, POPULATION; INDIA; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 27944490836     PISSN: 10495398     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10495390500263310     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Nivsarkar AE, Vij PK, Tantia MS. Animal Genetic Resources of India - Cattle and Buffalo. 2000; 50-54, 135-139. Directorate of Information and Publications of Agriculture, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.
2. Deshpande KS, Sakhare PG. Growth, development and performance of Red Kandhari cattle. Proc Symp Develop Deoni and Red Kandhari Cattle Breeds. MAU Parbhani, 1987: 25-31.
3. Moazami-Goudarzi K, Laloe D, Furet JP, Grosclaude F. Analysis of genetic relationships between 10 cattle breeds with 17 microsatellites. Anim Genet 1997; 30:338-345.
4. MacHugh DE, Loftus RT, Cunningham P, Bradley DG. Genetic structure of seven European cattle breeds assessed using 20 microsatellite markers. Anim Genet 1998; 29:333-340.
5. Martin-Burriel I, Garcia-Muro E, Zaragoza P. Genetic diversity analysis of six Spanish native cattle breeds using microsatellites. Anim Genet 1999; 30:177-182.
6. Mommens G, Peelman LJ, Van Zeveren A, D'leteren G, Wissocq N. Microsatellite variation between an African and five European taurine breeds results in a geographical phylogenetic tree with a bison out group. J Anim Breed Genet 1999; 116:325-330.
7. Beja-Pereira A, Alexandrino P, Bessa I, Carretero Y, Dunner S, Ferrand N, Jordana J, Laloe D, Moazami-Goudarzi K, Sanchez A, Canon J. Genetic characterization of South-western European bovine breeds: A historical and biogeographical reassessment with a set of 16 microsatellites. J Hered 2003; 94(3):243-250.
8. Jordana JN, Laloe D, Moazami-Goudarzi K, Sanchez A, Canon J. Genetic characterization of Southwestern European bovine breeds: A historical and biogeographical reassessment with a set of 16 microsatellites. J Hered 2003; 94(3):243-250.
9. Metta M, Kanginakudru S, Gudiseva N, Nagaraju, J, Genetic characterization of the Indian cattle breeds, Ongole and Deoni (Bos indicus), using microsatellite markers: A preliminary study. BMC Genet 2004; 5(16):5-16.
10. Kumar P, Freeman AR, Loftus RT, Gallard C, Fuller DQ, Bradley DG. Admixture analysis of South Asian cattle. Heredity 2003; 91:43-50.
11. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Global projects for the maintenance of Domestic Animal Genetic Diversity (MoDAD). http://www.fao.org/dad-is/, FAO, Rome, 1996.
12. Sambrook JE, Fritsch F, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Vol. 2, 2nd ed; Cold Spring Harbor, Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 1989.
13. Yeh F, Boyle C, Rongcai T, Ye ZY, Xian JM. POPGENE, version 1.31. A microsoft windows based freeware for population genetic analysis; University of Alberta, Edmonton, 1999.
14. Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW. Construction of genetic linkage maps in man using restriction fragment length polymorphism, Am J Human Genet 1980; 32: 314-331.
15. Raymond M, Rousset, F. GENEPOP (version 3.1d): An updated version of GENEPOP (version 1.2). Described in Raymond M, Rousset F. GENEPOP (version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 1995; 86:248-249.
16. Guo SW, Thompson EA. Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics 1992; 48:361-372.
17. Weir BS, Cockerham CC. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 1984; 38:1358-1370.
18. Wright S. Interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 1965; 19:395-420.
19. Wright S. Evolution and the Genetics of Natural Population, Vol. 4. Variability Within and Among Natural Population; University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1978.
20. Goudet J. FSTAT Computer Package for PCs; Institute of Ecology, UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2002.
21. Hochberg Y. A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 1988; 75:800-802.
22. Nei M. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1973; 70:3321-3323.
23. Raymond M, Rousset F. An exact test for population differentiation. Evolution 1995; 49:1280-1283.
24. Nei M. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 1978; 89:583-590.
25. Nei M, Tajima F, Tateno Y. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. J Mol Evol 1983; 19:153-170.
26. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AWF. Phylogenetic analysis: Models and estimation procedures. Am J Human Genet 1967; 19:233-257.
27. Reynolds J, Weir BS, Cockerham CC. Estimation of the coancestry coefficient: Basis for a short-term genetic distance. Genetics 1983; 105:767-779.
28. Goldstein DB, Ruiz-Linares A, Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW. Genetic absolute dating based on the origin of modern humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92:6723-6727.
29. Chakraborty R, Jin L. A unified approach to study hypervariable polymorphisms: Statistical considerations of determining relatedness and population distances. In DNA Fingerprinting: State of the Science; Pena SDJ, Chakraborty R, Epplen JT, Jeffreys AJ. Eds; Birkhauser Verlag Basel, Switzerland, 1993:153-175.
30. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for constructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406-425.
31. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP: Phylogeny Inference Package. Version 3.5p; Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, 1993.
32. Cornuet JM, Piry S, Luikart G, Estoup A, Solinac M. New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origin of individuals. Genetics 1999; 153:1989-2000.
33. Rannala B, Mountain JL. Detecting immigration by multi-locus genotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94:9197-9201.
34. Mac-Hugh DE, Shriver MD, Loftus RT, Cunningham P, Bradley DG. Microsatellite DNA variation and the evolution, domestication and phylogeography of taurine and zebu cattle (Bos taurus and Bos indicus). Genetics 1997; 146:1071-1086.
35. Peelman LJ, Mortiaux F, Van Zeveren A, Dansercoer A, Mommens G, Coopman F, Bouquet Y, Burny A, Renaville R, Portetelle D. Evaluation of genetic variability of 23 bovine microsatellite markers in four Belgian cattle breeds. Anim Genet 1998; 29:161-167.
36. Cañón J, Alexandrino P, Bessa I, Carleos C, Carretero Y, Dunner S, Ferrand N, García D, Jordana J, Laloë D, Pereira A, Sánchez A, Moazami-Goudarzi K. Genetic diversity measures of local European beef cattle breeds for conservation purposes. Genet Select Evol 2001; 33:311-332.
37. Weir BS. Genetic Data Analysis; Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, USA, 1990.
38. Schmid M, Saitbekova N, Gaillard C, Dolf G. Genetic diversity in Swiss cattle breeds. J Anim Breed Genet 1999; 116:1-8.
39. Kantanen J, Olsaker I, Holm LE, Lian S, Vilkki J, Brusgaard K, Eythorsdottir E, Danell B, Adalsteinsson S. Genetic diversity and population structure of 20 North European cattle breeds. J Hered 2000; 91:446-457.
40. Diaz S, Dulout FN, Peral-Garcia P. Greater genetic variability in Argentine Creole than in thoroughbred horses based on serum protein polymorphisms. Genet Mol Res 2002; 1(3):261-265.
41. Nei M, Roychaudhary AK. Genetic relationship and evolution of human races. Evol Biol 1982; 14:1-59.
42. Jordana J, Piedrafita J, Sanchez A, Puig P. Comparative F statistics analysis of the genetic structure of ten Spanish dog breeds. J Hered 1992; 83:367-374.