Transcription analysis of peloric mutants of Phalaenopsis orchids derived from tissue culture

Cell Research

Volumn 15, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 639-657

  Chen, Ya Huei ^a   Tsai, Yi Jung ^a   Huang, Jian Zhi ^a   Chen, Fure Chyi ^a  

^a NATIONAL PINGTUNG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

cDNA RAPD; Peloric mutant; Phalaenopsis; Suppression subtractive hybridization; Tissue culture

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENTARY DNA;

ARTICLE; FLOWER; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; MUTATION; ORCHIDACEAE; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUE;

DNA, COMPLEMENTARY; FLOWERS; GENE EXPRESSION; MUTATION; ORCHIDACEAE; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA TECHNIQUE; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

CYMBIDIUM MOSAIC VIRUS; ORCHIDACEAE; PHALAENOPSIS; PHALAENOPSIS HYBRIDA;

EID: 27944472264     PISSN: 10010602     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.cr.7290334     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Griesbach RJ. Development of Phalaenopsis orchids for the mass-market. 458-65. In: Janick J, Whipkey A (eds.), Trends in New Crops and New Uses. 2002; ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.
2. Hsu CC. Protocorm-like body induction and plant regeneration from etiolated leaves of in vitro Phalaenopsis. Master thesis, Institute of Tropical Agr And Intl Cooperation, Natl Pingtung Univ of Sci & Technol 2003; 88.
3. Hsu CC, Chen FC. Plant regeneration from protocorm-like bodies induced in etiolated leaves of Phalaenopsis aphrodite Rchb. f. J Chinese Soc Hort Sci 2003; 49:335-42.
4. Tanaka M. Micropropagation of Phalaenopsis spp. In: Bajaj YPS, (ed) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry 1992; 20: 246-68.
5. Tokuhara K, Mii M. Micropropagation of Phalaenopsis and Doritaenopsis by culturing shoot tips of flower stalk buds. Plant Cell Rep 1993; 13:7-11.
6. Chen FC, Chen TC. Effect of salt strength and organic additives on the in vitro growth of protocorm-like-bodies and plantlets of Oncidium Gower Ramsey. J Chinese Soc Hort Sci 1998; 44:403-12.
7. Chen YC, Chang C, Chang WC. A reliable protocol for plant regeneration from callus cultures of Phalaenopsis. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 2000; 36:420-3.
8. Ishii Y, Takamura T, Goi M, Tanaka M. Callus induction and somatic embryogenesis of Phalaenopsis. Plant Cell Rep 1998; 17:446-50.
9. Tokuhara K, Mii M. Somaclonal variations in flower and inflorescence in micropropagated plants through flower stalk bud of Phalaenopsis and Doritaenopsis axis culture. Plant Biotech 1998; 15:23-8.
10. Mishiba K, Mii M. Increasing ploidy level in cell suspension cultures of Doritaenopsis by exogenous application of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Physiol. Plant. 2001; 112:142-8.
11. th Proc. Asia Pacific Orchid Conference, 2004; Tainan, Taiwan.
12. th Proc. Asia Pacific Orchid Conference, 2004; Tainan, Taiwan.
13. Hirochika H. Activation of tobacco retrotransposons during tissue culture. EMBO J 1993; 12:2521-8.
14. Hirochika H, Sugimoto K, Otsuki Y, Tsugawa H, Kanda M. Retrotransposons of rice involved in mutations induced by tissue culture. Proc. Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93:7783-8.
15. Kaeppler SM, Phillips RL. Tissue culture-induced DNA methylation variation in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993; 90: 8773-6.
16. Kaeppler SM, Kaeppler HF, Rhee Y. Epigenetic aspects of somaclonal variation in plants. Plant Mol Biol 2000; 43:179-88.
17. Kimura Y, Tosa Y, Shimada S, et al. OARE-1, a Ty1-copia retrotransposon in oat activated by abiotic and biotic stresses. Plant Cell Physiol 2001; 42:1345-54.
18. Kubis SE, AM Castilho, AV Vershinin, Heslop-Harrison JS. Retroelements, transposons and methylation status in the genome of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) and the relationship to somaclonal variation. Plant Mol Biol 2003; 52:69-79.
19. Price Z, Dumortier F, MacDonald W, Mayes S. Characterisation of copia-like retrotransposons in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Theor Appl Genet 2002; 104:860-7.
20. Grandbastien MA. Activation of plant retrotransposons under stress conditions. Trends Plant Sci 1998; 3:181-7.
21. Chen WH, Chen TM, Fu YM, Hsieh RM, Chen WS. Studies on somaclonal variation in phalaenopsis. Plant Cell Rep 1998; 18: 7-13.
22. Rival A, Bertrand L, Beulé T, et al. Suitability of RAPD analysis for the detection of somaclonal variants in oil palm. Plant Breed 1998; 117:73-6.
23. Jaligot E, Beule T, Rival A. Methylation- sensitive RFLPs: characterisation of two oil palm markers showing somaclonal variation-associated polymorphism. Theor Appl Genet 2002; 104:1263-9.
24. Jaligot E, Rival A, Beule T, Dussert S, Verdeil J-L. Somaclonal variation in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.): the DNA methylation hypothesis. Plant Cell Rep 2000; 7:684-90.
25. Alou AH, Azaiez A, Jean M, Belzile FJ. Involvement of the Arabidopsis thaliana AtPMS1 gene in somatic repeat instability. Plant Mol Biol 2004; 56:339-49.
26. Leonard JM, Bollmann SR, Hays JB. Reduction of stability of arabidopsis genomic and transgenic DNA-repeat sequences (microsatellites) by inactivation of AtMSH2 mismatch-repair function. Plant Physiol 2003; 133:328-38.
27. Schmidt AL, Mitter V. Microsatellite mutation directed by an external stimulus. Mutat Res 2004; 568:233-43.
28. Jones WE, Kuehnle AR, Arumuganathan K. Nuclear DNA content of 26 orchid (Orchidaceae) genera with emphasis on Dendrobium. Ann Bot 1998; 82:189-94.
29. Kao Y-Y, Chang S-B, Lin T-Y, et al. Differential accumulation of heterochromatin as a cause for karyotype variation in Phalaenopsis orchids. Ann Bot 2001; 87:387-395.
30. Lin S, Lee H-C, Chen W-H, et al. Nuclear DNA contents of Phalaenopsis sp. and Doritis pulcherrima. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 2001; 126:195-9.
31. Diatchenko L, Lau YF, Campbell AP, et al. Suppression subtractive hybridization: a method for generating differentially regulated or tissue-specific cDNA probes and libraries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93:6025-30.
32. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:3389-402.
33. Bohnert HJ, P. Ayoubi C, Borchert RA, et al. A genomics approach towards salt stress tolerance. Plant Physiol Biochem 2001; 39:295-311.
34. Czechowski T, Bari RP, Stitt M, Scheible WR, Udvardi MK. Real-time RT-PCR profiling of over 1400 Arabidopsis transcription factors: unprecedented sensitivity reveals novel root- and shoot-specific genes. Plant J 2004; 38:366-79.
35. Gamas P, Niebel Fde C, Lescure N, Cullimore J. Use of a subtractive hybridization approach to identify new Medicago truncatula genes induced during root nodule development. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 1996; 9:233-42.
36. Ge YX, Angenent GC, Wittich PE, et al. NEC1, a novel gene, highly expressed in nectary tissue of Petunia hybrida. Plant J 2000; 24:725-34.
37. Becerra C, Jahrmann T, Puigdomenech P, Vicient CM. Ankyrin repeat-containing proteins in Arabidopsis: characterization of a novel and abundant group of genes coding ankyrin-transmembrane proteins. Gene 2004; 340:111-21.
38. Silhavy D, Molnár A, Lucioli A, et al. A viral protein suppresses RNA silencing and binds silencing-generated, 21- to 25-nucleotide double-stranded RNAs. EMBO J 2002; 21:3070-80.
39. Cubas P, Vincent C, Coen E. An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature 1999; 401:157-61.
40. Cubas P, Lauter N, Doebley J, Coen E. The TCP domain: a motif found in proteins regulating plant growth and development. Plant J 1999; 18:215-22.
41. Kosugi S, Ohashi Y. DNA binding and dimerization specificity and potential targets for the TCP protein family. Plant J 2002; 30:337-48.
42. Rebrikov DV, Britanova OV, Gurskaya NG, et al. Mirror orientation selection (MOS): a method for eliminating false positive clones from libraries generated by suppression subtractive hybridization. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28, E90.
43. Ito T, Takahashi N, Shimura Y, Okada K. A serine/threonine protein kinase gene isolated by an in vivo binding procedure using the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene product, AGAMOUS. Plant Cell Physiol 1997; 38:248-58.
44. Shpak ED, Berthiaume CT, Hill EJ, Torii KU. Synergistic interaction of three ERECTA-family receptor-like kinases controls Arabidopsis organ growth and flower development by promoting cell proliferation. Development 2004; 131:1491-501.
45. Venglat SP, Dumonceaux T, Rozwadowski K, et al. The homeobox gene BREVIPEDICELLUS is a key regulator of inflorescence architecture in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99: 4730-35.
46. Seoh ML, Wong SM, Zhang L. Simultaneous TD/RT-PCR detection of cymbidium mosaic potexvirus and odontoglossum ringspot tobamovirus with a single pair of primers. J Virol Methods 1998; 72:197-204.
47. Chen HH, Tsai WC, Lin S, Chen WH. cDNA-AFLP analysis of differential gene expression in the flower buds of Phalaenopsis HSIANG FEI cv. H. F. and its somaclonal variant. Plant & Animal Genome IX 2001; P323
48. Hileman LC, Kramer EM, Baum DA. Differential regulation of symmetry genes and the evolution of floral morphologies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100:12814-9.
49. Luo D, Carpenter R, Copsey L, et al. Control of organ asymmetry in flowers of Antirrhinum. Cell 1999; 99:367-76.
50. Kappen C. Analysis of a complete homeobox gene repertoire: Implications for the evolution of diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97:4481-86.
51. Nadeau JA, Zhang XS, Li J, O'Neill SD. Ovule development: identification of stage-specific and tissue-specific cDNAs. Plant Cell 1996; 8:213-39.
52. Ito M, Sentoku N, Nishimura A, et al. Position dependent expression of GL2-type homeobox gene, Roc1: significance for protoderm differentiation and radial pattern formation in early rice embryogenesis. Plant J 2002; 29:497-507.
53. Zgurski JM, Sharma R, Bolokoski DA, Schultz LA. Asymmetric auxin response precedes asymmetric growth and differentiation of asymmetric leaf1 and asymmetric leaf2 arabidopsis leaves. Plant Cell 2005; 17:77-91.
54. Hirayama T, Oka A. Novel protein kinase of Arabidopsis thaliana (APK1) that phosphorylates tyrosine, serine and threonine. Plant Mol Biol 1992; 20:653-62.
55. Hwang I, Goodman HM. An Arabidopsis thaliana root-specific kinase homolog is induced by dehydration, ABA, and NaCl. Plant J 1995; 8:37-43.
56. Moran TV, Walker JC. Molecular cloning of two novel protein kinase genes from Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochim Biophys Acta 1993; 1216:9-14.
57. Bum JL, Bagnall DJ, Metzger JD, Dennis LS, Peacock WJ. DNA methylation, vernalization, and the initiation of flowering. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993; 90:287-91.
58. Finnegan EJ, Genger RK, Kovac K, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES. DNA methylation and the promotion of flowering by vernalization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95:5824-9.
59. Jaligot L, Beule T, Baurens LC, Billotte N, Rival A. Search for methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphisms associated with the mantled variant phenotype in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq). Genome 2004; 47:224-8.
60. Sheldon CC, Burn JL, Perez PP, et al. The FLF MADS box gene: a repressor of flowering in Arabidopsis regulated by vernalization and methylation. Plant Cell 1999; 11:445-58.