Undue inducements and reasonable risks: Will the dismal science lead to dismal research ethics?

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 29-32

  London, Alex John ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; ETHICS; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NOTE; PATIENT SELECTION; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SALARY AND FRINGE BENEFIT;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

CLINICAL TRIALS; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; RISK-TAKING; SALARIES AND FRINGE BENEFITS;

EID: 27944470426     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160500245105     Document Type: Note

References (7)

1. Ariely, D., and G. Loewenstein. In press. The heat of the moment: The effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making.
2. Emanuel. E. J. 2005. Undue inducement: Nonsense on stilts? The American Journal of Bioethics 5(5): 9-13.
3. Grant, R. W., and J. Sugarman. 2004. Ethics in human subjects research: Do incentives matter? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29(6): 717-738.
4. Levi, I. 1986. Hard choices: Decision making under unresolved conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. London, A. J. 2003. Threats to the common good: Biochemical weapons and human subjects research. Hastings Center Report 33(5): 17-25.
6. Richards, D. A. J. 1982. Sex, drugs, death and the law. Rowman and Littlefield.
7. Sen, A. 2002. Rationality and freedom. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.