Are water tables a subdued replica of the topography?

Ground Water

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 781-786

  Haitjema, Henk M ^a   Mitchell Bruker, Sherry ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Everglades National Park   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD; GROUNDWATER; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY;

LAND SURFACE; SUBDUED REPLICA; WATER TABLE;

AQUIFERS;

GROUNDWATER; NUMERICAL MODEL; TOPOGRAPHIC EFFECT; UNCONFINED AQUIFER; WATER TABLE;

ARTICLE; GEOGRAPHY; GEOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL; WATER FLOW; WATER SUPPLY;

GEOGRAPHY; GEOLOGY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; WATER MOVEMENTS; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 27944466663     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.00090.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bear, J. 1972, Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. New York: American Elsevier.
2. Blaskova, S., K. Beven, P. Tachecci, and A. Kulasova. 2002. Testing the distributed water table predictions of TOPMODEL (allowing for uncertainty in model calibration): The death of TOPMODEL? Water Resources Research 38, no. 11: 1257-1268.
3. Davis, S.N., and R.J.M. De Wiest. 1966. Hydrogeology. New York: Wiley.
4. Desbarats, A.J., C.E. Logan, M.J. Hinton, and D.R. Sharpe. 2002. On the Kriging of water table elevations using collateral information from a digital elevation model. Journal of Hydrology 255, no. 1: 25-39.
5. Dupuit, J. 1863. Etudes Théoriques et Practiques sur le Mouvement des Eaux dans les Canaux Découverts et à Travers les Terrains Perméables, 2nd ed. Paris, France: Dunod.
6. Forchheimer, P. 1886. Über die Ergiebigkeit von Brunnen-Anlagen und Sickerschlitzen. Zeitschrift des Architectenund Ingenieurs Vereins zu Hannover 32, 539-564.
7. Freeze, R.A., and J.A. Cherry. 1979. Groundwater. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
8. Haitjema, H.M. 1995. Analytic Element Modeling of Ground-water Flow. San Diego, California: Academic Press.
9. Harr, M.E. 1962. Groundwater and Seepage. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10. Hubbert, M.K. 1940. The Theory of ground-water motion. The Journal of Geology 48, no. 8: 785-944.
11. Kirkham, D. 1967. Explanation of paradoxes in Dupuit-Forchheimer seepage theory. Water Resources Research 3, no. 2: 609-622.
12. Mitchell-Bruker, S. 1993. Modeling steady state groundwater flow and surface water interactions. Ph.D. diss., School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University.
13. Moore, R.D., and J.C. Thompson. 1996. Are water table variations in a shallow forest soil consistent with the TOPMODEL concept? Water Resources Research 32, no. 3: 663-669.
14. Muskat, M. 1937. The Flow of Homogeneous Fluids through Porous Media. Ann Arbor, Michigan: McGraw-Hill.
15. Ophori, D.U., and J. Toth. 1989. Characteristics of ground water flow by field mapping and numerical simulation, Ross Creek Basin, Alberta, Canada. Ground Water 27, no. 2: 193-201.
16. Polubarinova-Kochina, P.Y. 1962. Theory of Groundwater Movement. Translated by J.M.R. De Wiest. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
17. Polubarinova-Kochina, P.Y. 1952. Theory of Groundwater Movement [in Russian]. Moscow, Russia: Gostekhizdat.
18. Shaman, J., M. Stieglitz, V. Engel, R. Koster, and C. Stark. 2002. Representation of subsurface storm flow and a more responsive water table in a TOPMODEL-based hydrology model. Water Resources Research 38, no. 8: 1156-1172.
19. Stoerz, M.W., and K.R. Bradbury. 1989. Mapping recharge areas using a ground-water flow model: A case study. Ground Water 27, no. 2: 220-228.
20. Strack, O.D.L. 1984. Three-dimensional streamlines in Dupuit-Forschheimer models. Water Resources Research 20, no. 7: 812-822.
21. Strack, O.D.L. 1989. Ground Water Mechanics. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
22. Toth, J. 1963. A theoretical analysis of groundwater flow in small drainage basins. Journal of Geophysical Research 68, no. 16: 4795-4812.