Environmental collaborations and constituency communication

Group Communication in Context: Studies of Bona Fide Groups, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 209-234

  Lange, Jonathan I ^a  

^a SOUTHERN OREGON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27944456591     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (66)

1. Adams, J. S. (1976). The structure and dynamics of behavior in organizational boundary roles. InM. D. Dunnette, (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1175-1199). Chicago: Rand-McNally.
2. Amy, D.J. (1987). The politics of environmental mediation. New York: Columbia University Press.
3. Ancona, D. G. (1990). Outward bound: Strategiesfor team survival in the organization. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 334-365.
4. Ancona, D. G., Friedman, R. A., &Kolb, D. M. (1991). The group and what happens on the way to “yes.�? Negotiation Journal, 7, 155-173.
5. Bacow, L. S., & Wheeler, M. (1984). Environmental dispute resolution. New York: Plenum Press.
6. Barge, J. K., & Frey, L. R. (1997). Life in a task group. In L. R. Frey & J. K. Barge (Eds.), Managing group life: Communicating in decision-making groups (pp. 29-51). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
7. Ben-Yoav, O., & Pruitt, D. G. (1984). Accountability to constituents: A two-edged sword. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 283-295.
8. Bingham, G. (1988). Resolving environmental disputes: A decade of experience. Washington, DC: Conservation Foundation.
9. Brick, P., Snow, D., & Van de Wetering, P. (2000). (Eds.). Across the great divide: Explorations in collaborative conservation and the American West. Washing-ton, DC: Island Press.
10. Bush, R. A. B., &Folger, J. P. (1994). Thepromise of mediation: Responding to conflict through empowerment and recognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Carpenter, S. L., & Kennedy, W. J. D. (1988). Managingpublic disputes: Apractical guide to handling conflict and reaching decisions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Colosi, T. (1983). Negotiation in the public and private sectors: A core model. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 229-253.
13. Cox, J. R. (1982). The die iscast: Topical and ontological dimensionsof the locusof the irreparable. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 68, 227-239.
14. Crowfoot, J. E., & Wondolleck, J. M. (1990). Environmental disputes: Community involvement in conflict resolution. Washington, DC: Island Press.
15. Devine, R. (1994). Management and the uncertainty principle. Wilderness, 58, 10-23.
16. Dukes, F. (1993). Public conflict resolution: A transformative approach. Negotiation Journal, 9, 45-57.
17. Durbin, K. (1993a, February 14). Applegate valley edgestoward a forest truce. The Oregonian, p.D4.
18. Durbin, K. (1994, April 6). Forest group acts for independence. The Oregonian, p. B2.
19. Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31-41.
20. Fattig, P. (1993a, February 14). Peace in the forest. The Mail Tribune, pp. 1A-2A.
21. Fattig, P. (1993b, February 14). Partnership servesasmodel for future problem-solving. The Mail Tribune, p. 2A
22. Fattig, P. (1993c, March 28). Babbitt likeslocal project. The Mail Tribune, pp.1-2A.
23. Fattig, P. (1994, April 2) Headwatersleavesforest panel. The Mail Tribune, pp. 1A-3A.
24. Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (with Patton, B). (1981). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
25. Folger, J. P., & Bush, R. A. B. (1994). Ideology, orientations to conflict, and mediation discourse. In J. P. Folger &T. S.Jones (Eds.), New directions in mediation: Communication research and perspectives (pp. 3-25). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Freeman, S. A., Littlejohn, S. W., & Pearce, W. B. (1992). Communication and moral conflict. Western Journal of Communication, 56, 311-329.
27. Friedman, R. A. (1992). The culture of mediation: Private understandings in the context of public conflict. In D. Kolb & J. M. Bartunek (Eds.), Hidden conflict in organizations: Uncovering behind the scenes disputes (pp. 143-164). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Friedman, R. A. (1994). Front stage, back stage: The dramatic structure of labor negotiations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Friedman, R. A., &Poldony, J. (1992). Differentiation ofboundary spanning roles: Labor negotiationsand implicationsfor role conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 28-47.
30. Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multi-party prob-lems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31. Kemmis, D. (1990). Community and the politics of place. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
32. Lange, J. I. (1988, November). The rhetoric of “no compromise�?: The case of Earth First! Paper presented at the meeting of the Speech Communication Associa-tion, New Orleans, LA.
33. Lange, J.I. (1989, November). Toward a research agenda on environmental communication: “Indications�?from the spotted owl. Paper presented at the meet-ing of the Speech Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
34. Lange, J. I. (1990). Refusal to compromise: The case of Earth First! WesternJournal of Speech Communication, 54, 473-494.
35. Lange, J. I. (1992, November). New perspectives on collaboration: Environmen-talists, timber industry representatives and the United States Forest Service. Paper presented at the meeting ofthe Speech Communication Association, Chi-cago, IL.
36. Lange, J. I. (1993). The logic of competing information campaigns: Conflict over old growth and the spotted owl. Communication Monographs, 60, 239-257.
37. Lange, J. I. (1994, February). The forest conference: Prelude to a form. Paper pre-sented at the meeting ofthe Western Speech Communication Association, San Jose, CA.
38. Lange, J. I. (2000). Exploring paradox in environmental collaborations. In P. Brick. D. Snow, & S. Van de Wetering (Eds.), Across the great divide: Explorations in collaborative conservation and the American West (pp. 200-211). Washington, DC: Island Press.
39. Littlejohn, S. W., Shailor, J., & Pearce, W. B. (1994). The deep structure of reality in mediation. In J. P. Folger & T. S. Jones(Eds.), New directions in mediation: Communication research and perspectives (pp. 67-83). Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.
40. Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1995). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
41. Moore, C. W. (1994). Mediator communication and influence in conflict management interventions: A practitioner’sreflectionson theory and practice. In J. P. Folger & T. S. Jones(Eds.), New directions in mediation: Communication research and perspectives (pp. 209-221). Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.
42. Moore, T. (1993, February 19). We can work it out. The Capitol Press, pp. 1-2.
43. Nash, R. F. (1989). The rights of nature: A history of environmental ethics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
44. Oravec, C. (1984). Conservationismvs. preservationism: The public interest in the Hetch-Hetchy controversy. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 444-458.
45. Peterson, T. R. (1988). The rhetorical construction of institutional authority in a Senate subcommittee hearing on wilderness legislation. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 52, 259-276.
46. Pittman, A. (1994, March 10). Disagreement on consensus: Applegate model splits the Greens. Eugene Weekly, p.9.
47. Pruitt, D. G. (1994). Negotiation between organizations: A branching chain model. Negotiation Journal, 10, 217-230.
48. Pruitt, D. G., &Carnevale, P.J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
49. Putnam, L. L. (1985). Collective bargaining asorganizational communication. In P. K. Tompkins& R. McPhee (Eds.), Organizational communication: Tradi-tional themes and new directions (pp. 129-148). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
50. Putnam, L. L. (1994). Challenging the assumptions oftraditional approaches to ne-gotiation. Negotiation Journal, 10, 337-346.
51. Putnam, L. L., & Jones, T. S. (1982). The role of communication in bargaining. Human Communication Research, 8, 262-280.
52. Putnam, L. L., & Stohl, C. (1996). Bona fide groups: An alternative perspective for communication and small group decision making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 147-177). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Roloff, M. E., & Campion, D. E. (1987). On alleviating the debilitating effectsof ac-countability on bargaining: Authority and self-monitoring. Communication Monographs, 54, 145-164.
54. Senecah, S. (1997, February). Dimensions of accountability: Compromise among state environmental groups in a legislative arena. Paper presented at the meeting ofthe Western States Communication Association, Monterey, CA.
55. Sheriff, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Inter-group conflict and cooperation: The robber’s cave experiment. Norman, OK: University Book Exchange.
56. Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographicinterview. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
57. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
58. Smith, K. K., & Berg, D. N. (1987). Paradoxes of group life: Understanding conflict, paralysis, and movement in group dynamics. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
59. Stohl, C., & Putnam, L. L. (1994). Group communication in context: Implications for the study of bona fide groups. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of natural groups (pp. 285-292). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
60. Susskind, L., & Cruikshank, J. (1987). Breaking the impasse: Consensual approaches to resolving public disputes. New York: Basic Books.
61. Thurow, L. (1980). The zero-sum society: Distribution and the possibilities for economic change. New York: Basic Books.
62. Turner, D. B. (1992). Negotiator-constituent relationships. InL. L. Putnam &M. E. Roloff (Eds.), Communication and negotiation (pp. 233-249). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
63. Van Maanen, J. (1992). Drinking our troublesaway: Managing conflict in a British police agency. In D. M. Kolb &J. M. Bartunek (Eds.), Hidden conflict in organizations: Uncovering behind the scenes disputes (pp. 32-62). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
64. Walker, G. B., & Daniels, S. E. (1994, February). The forest conference as commu-nication: Dialogue versus strategic control. Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Speech Communication Association, San Jose, CA.
65. Walton, R. E., &Mckersie, R. B. (1965). Abehavioral theory of labor negotiations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
66. Wondolleck, J. M., & Yaffe, S. L. (1994). Building bridges across agency boundaries: In search of excellence in the United States Forest Service. Research report submitted to the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, in fulfillment of USDA Cooperative Agreement #PNW 92-0215.