The interactional organization of the gender attribution process

Sociology

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 67-87

  Speer, Susan A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conversation analysis; Ethnomethodology; Gender attribution; Gender identity; Natural attitude

Indexed keywords

EID: 27944453938     PISSN: 00380385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0038038505049002     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Butler, J. (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
2. Crawford, M. (2000) 'A Reappraisal of "Gender: An Ethnomethodological Approach"', Feminism & Psychology 10(1): 7-10.
3. Edwards, D. (1998) 'The Relevant Thing about Her: Social Identity Categories in Use', in C. Antaki and S. Widdicombe (eds) Identities in Talk, pp. 15-33. London: Sage.
4. Fenstermaker, S. and C. West (eds) (2002) Doing Gender, Doing Difference: Inequality, Power, and Institutional Change. New York: Routledge.
5. Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. Goffman, E. (1976) Gender Advertisements. London: Macmillan.
7. Hird, M.J. (2002) 'For a Sociology of Transsexualism', Sociology 36(3): 577-95.
8. Hopper, R. and C. LeBaron (1998) 'How Gender Creeps into Talk', Research on Language and Social Interaction 31(1): 59-74.
9. Hutchby, I. and R. Wooffitt (1998) Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
10. Jefferson, G. (1984) '"At First I Thought": A Normalizing Device for Extraordinary Events', unpublished manuscript. Katholieke Hogeschool Tilburg.
11. Kessler, S.J. and W. McKenna (1978) Gender: An Ethnomethodological Approach. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12. Ochs, E. (1992) 'Indexing Gender', in A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (eds) Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, pp. 335-58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Potter, J. (1996) Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage.
14. Speer, S.A. (2001) 'Reconsidering the Concept of Hegemonic Masculinity: Discursive Psychology, Conversation Analysis, and Participants' Orientations', Feminism & Psychology 11(1): 107-35.
15. Speer, S.A. (2002a) 'What Can Conversation Analysis Contribute to Feminist Methodology? Putting Reflexivity into Practice', Discourse & Society 13(6): 801-21.
16. Speer, S.A. (2002b) 'Sexist Talk: Gender Categories, Participants' Orientations and Irony', Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(3): 347-77.
17. Stokoe, E.H. (in press) 'Doing Gender, Doing Categorisation: Exploring the Possibilities of Membership Categorisation Analysis for Feminist Researchers', Sociological Review.
18. West C. and D.H. Zimmerman (1991) 'Doing Gender', in J. Lorber and S.A. Farrell (eds) The Social Construction of Gender, pp. 13-37. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Wooffitt, R. (1992) Telling Tales of the Unexpected: The Organization of Factual Discourse. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.