Organizational power and the institutional review board

Journal of Applied Communication Research

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 277-284

  Dougherty, Debbie S ^a   Kramer, Michael W ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Applied research; Institutional review board

Indexed keywords

EID: 27944451408     PISSN: 00909882     EISSN: 14795752     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00909880500149494     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.
2. Deetz, S. (2001). Conceptual foundations. In F. M. Jablin, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 3-46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Foucault, M. (1984). Panopticism (from Discipline and Punish). In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Foucault reader (pp. 206-213). New York: Pantheon Books.
4. French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
5. Meyerson, D., & Martin, J. (1987). Cultural change: An integration of three different views. Journal of Management, 24, 623-647.
6. Miller, K. I. (2000). Common ground from the post-positivist perspective: From "straw person" argument to collaborative coexistence. In S. R. Corman, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Perspectives in organizational communication: Finding common ground (pp. 46-67). New York: Guilford.
7. Mumby, D. K. (2001). Power and politics. In F. M. Jablin, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication (pp. 585-624). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Pierce, T., & Dougherty, D. S. (2002). The construction, enactment, and maintenance of Power-as-domination through an acquisition. The case of TWA and Ozark Airlines. Management Communication Quarterly, 76, 129-164.
9. Taylor, B. C. (2005). Postmodern theory. In S. May, & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), Engaging organizational communication theory and research: Multiple perspectives (pp. 113-140). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Tompkins, P. K. (1987). Translating organizational theory: Symbolism over substance. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 70-96). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.