An evaluation of failure modes and effects analysis generation method for conceptual design

International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 279-293

  Teoh, P C ^a   Case, Keith ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; QUALITY ASSURANCE; SOFTWARE PROTOTYPING;

FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA); PRODUCT QUALITY; PROTOTYPE SOFTWARE;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 27944447988     PISSN: 0951192X     EISSN: 13623052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0951192042000273122     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. BENJAMIN, P. C., MENZEL, C. C., MAYER, R. J., FILLION, F., FUTRELL, M. T., DEWITTE, P. S. and LINGINENI, M., 1994, IDEF5 Method Report. Information Integration for Concurrent Engineering (IICE). Knowledge Based Systems, Inc.
2. BOUTI, A., AIT K. D. and DHOUIB, K., 1994, Automated manufacturing systems failure analysis based on a functional reasoning. 10th ISPE/IFAC International Conference on CAD/CAM, Robotics and Factories of the Future CARs & FOF '94. Information Technology for Modern Manufacturing. (Kanata, Ontario: OCRI Publications), pp. 423-429.
3. BS 5760: Part 5, 1991, Reliability of systems, equipment and components. Guide to failure modes, effects and criticality analysis (FMEA and FMECA).
4. CHEN, H. C., 1996, Failure modes and effects analysis training manual, Personal Communication, Hen Technology Inc, United States.
5. EUBANKS, C. F., KMENTA, S. and ISHII, K., 1996, System behavior modelling as a basis for advance failure modes and effects analysis. Proceeding of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference and Computers in Engineering Conference, Irvine, CA, August, 1996.
6. EUBANKS, C. F., KMENTA, S. and ISHII, K., 1997, Advanced failure modes and effects analysis using behavior modelling. Proceeding of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference and Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Sacramento, CA, 14-17 Sept. 1997
7. GERO, J. S., THAM, K. W. and LEE, H. S., 1991, Behaviour - a link between functional and structure in design. Proceeding of the IFIP WG 5.2 Working Conference on Intelligent Computer Aided Design, Colombus, OH, 30 Sept-3 Oct. 1991. (Elsevier).
8. HAWKINS, P. G. and WOOLLONS, D. J., 1998, Failure modes and effects analysis of complex engineering systems using functional models. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 12(4), 375-397.
9. HIRTZ, J., STONE, R. B., MCADAMS, D. A., SZYKMAN, S. and WOOD, K. L., 2001, A functional basis for engineering design: reconciling and evolving previous efforts. Research in Engineering Design, 13(2), 65-82.
10. HUGHES, N., CHOU, E., PRICE, C. J. and LEE, M., 1999, Automating mechanical FMEA using functional models. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Florida AI Research Society Conference, (AAAI Press, Menlo, CA), pp. 394-398.
11. HUNT, J. E., PUGH, D. R. and PRICE, C. J., 1995, Failure mode effects analysis: a practical application of functional modelling. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 9(1), 33-44.
12. INVENTION MACHINE CORPORATION, 2001, TechOptimizer. http://www.invention- machine.com/products/techoptimizer.cfm
13. KATO, Y., SHIRAKAWA, T. and HORI, K., 2002, Utilizing fault cases for supporting fault diagnosis tasks. Department of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, University of Tokyo. http://www.ai.rcast.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~yoshi/papers/ kes2002.pdf
14. KEUNEKE, A., 1991, Device representation, the significant of functional knowledge. IEEE Expert, Vol. 6(2), 22-25.
15. KMENTA, S. and ISHII, K., 1998, Advanced FMEA using meta behavior modelling for concurrent design of products and controls. Proceeding of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Atlanta, GA.
16. KMENTA, S., FITCH, P. and ISHII, K., 1999, Advanced failure modes and effects analysis of complex processes. Proceeding of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Las Vegas.
17. LEE, B. H., 1999, Design FMEA for mechatronic systems using Bayesian network causal models. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 1, 1235-1246.
18. NOY, N. F. and MCGUINNESS, D. L., 2001, Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology. Stanford University, Stanford CA. http://protege.stanford.edu/publications/ontology_development/ontology101.pdf
19. PELAEZ, C. E. and BOWLES, J. B., 1996, Using fuzzy cognitive maps as a system model for failure modes and effects analysis. Information Sciences, Vol. 88(1-4), p. 177-199.
20. PRICE, C. J., 1997, AutoSteve: automated electrical design analysis. IEE Colloquium (Digest), 338, 4/1-4/3.
21. Proceedings of the 1997 IEE Colloquium on Applications of Model-Based Reasoning.
22. PRICE, C. J., PUGH, D. R., WILSON, M. S. and SNOOKE, N., 1995, FLAME system: automating electrical failure mode & effects analysis (FMEA). Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, pp. 90-95.
23. RUIZ, I., PANIAGUA, E., ALBERTO, J. and SANABRIA, J., 2000, State analysis: an alternative approach to FMEA, FTA and Markov analysis. Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, pp. 370-375.
24. RUSSOMANNO, D. J., 1999, A function-centered framework for reasoning about system failure at multiple levels of abstraction. Expert System, 16(3), pp. 148-169.
25. RUSSOMANNO, D. J., BONNELL, R. D. and BOWLES, J. B., 1993, Functional reasoning in a failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) expert-system. Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintenability Symposioum, pp. 339-347.
26. SEMBUGAMOORTHY, V. and CHANDERASEKARAN, B., 1986, Functional representation of devices and compilation of diagnositic problem solving systems. In: J. Kolodner and C. Reisbeck (Eds), Experience, Memory, and Reasoning (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum), pp. 47-73.
27. SOWA, J. F., 1991, Principles of Semantic Networks - Exploration in the Representation of Knowledge. Part 1: Issues in Knowledge Representation. (New York: Morgan Kaufmann).
28. WIRTH, R., BERTHOLD, B., KRAMER, A. and GERHARD, P., 1996, Knowledge-based support of system analysis for analysis of failure modes and effects. Engineering Applied Artificial Intelligence, 9(9), 219-229.