A rationale for scholarly examination of institutional review boards: A case study

Journal of Applied Communication Research

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 183-188

  Dougherty, Debbie S ^a   Kramer, Michael W ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Applied research; Institutional review board

Indexed keywords

EID: 27944447666     PISSN: 00909882     EISSN: 14795752     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00909880500149270     Document Type: Review

References (3)

1. Annas, G. J. (2001). Reforming informed consent to genetic research. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 286, 2326-2328.
2. Brainard, J. (2004, April 13). Federal regulators again push U. of Alabama-Birmingham to improve human subjects protections [Electronic version]. The Chronicle of Higher Education, Today's News. Retrieved April 13, 2004, from http://chronicle.com/daily/2004/04/2004041301n.htm
3. Foucar, E. (2002). How much oversight is necessary to protect human subjects. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 716-717.