Colposcopy: An evidence-based update

Journal of the American Board of Family Practice

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 383-392

  Dresang, Lee T ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOCARCINOMA; CANCER SCREENING; COLPOSCOPY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CURETTAGE; ENDOMETRIUM POLYP; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GENITAL TRACT CANCER; HUMAN; MENOPAUSE; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PREGNANCY; REVIEW; SEXUAL ABUSE; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; TELECOMMUNICATION; TREATMENT INDICATION; UROGENITAL TRACT DISEASE; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU;

EID: 27944445496     PISSN: 08938652     EISSN: 15448770     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.18.5.383     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Paraskevaidis E, Arbyn M. HPV testing versus cervical cytology for screening for cancer of the uterine cervix. Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2004.
2. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for cervical cancer: recommendations and rationale. American Family Physician 2003;67:1759-66.
3. Spitzer M, Apgar B, Brotzman G, Krumhoz BA. Residency training in colposcopy: a survey of program directors in obstetrics and gynecology and family practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:507-13.
4. Wright TC Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, Twiggs LB, Wilkinson EJ. Consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities. JAMA 2001;287:2120-9.
5. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. Forum Group Members. Bethesda 2001 Workshop. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA 2002;287:2114-9.
6. Wright T, Schiffman M, Solomon D, et al. Interim guidance for the use of human papillomavirus DNA testing as an adjunct to cervical cytology for screening. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:304-9.
7. Kim JJ, Wright TC, Goldie SJ. Cost-effectiveness of alternative triage strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. JAMA 2002;287: 2382-90.
8. The cervix: colposcopy: high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: cytology, histology, and colposcopy. American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. http://www.asccp.org/edu/practice/cervix/ colposcopy/highgrade.shtml. Site last visited March 28, 2005.
9. Wright TC Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, Carlson J, Twiggs LB, Wilkinson EJ. 2001 Consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189:295-304.
10. The ASCUS-LSIL Study (ALTS) Group. A randomized trial on the management of low-grade intraepithelial lesion cytology interpretations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1393-400.
11. Levine L, Lucci JA, Dinh TV. Atypical glandular cells: new Bethesda terminology and management guidelines. Obstet Gynecol Survey 2003;58: 399-406.
12. Britton H, Hansen K. Sexual abuse. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1997;40:226-40.
13. Hobbs C, Wynne J. Use of colposcope in examination for sexual abuse. Arch Disease Childhood 1996; 75:539-42.
14. The cervix: colposcopy: colposcopic appearance of benign lesions. American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. http://www.asccp.org/ edu/ practice/cervix/colposcopy/benign.shtml. Site last visited March 28, 2005.
15. Dresang LT. Cervical cancer with a normal Pap. WMJ 2003;102:4.
16. Boardman LA, Meinz H, Steinhoff MM, Heber WW, Blume J. A randomized trial of the sleeved cytobrush and the endocervical curette. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:426-30.
17. Palle C, Bangsboll S, Andreasson B. Cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79:306-10.
18. Nuovo J, Melnikow J, Howell L. New tests for cervical cancer screening. Am Fam Physician 2001; 64:780-6.
19. Tseng DS, Cox E, Plane MB, Hia KM. Efficacy of patient letter reminders on cervical cancer screening. A meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:563-8.
20. Ferris DG, Litaker MS, Macfee MS, Miller JA. Remote diagnosis of cervical neoplasia: 2 types of telecolposcopy compared with cervicography. J Fam Pract 2003;52:298-304.
21. Susman J. Telemedicine marches on: the efficacy of remote telecolposcopy (Editorial). J Fam Pract 2003; 52:264.
22. Bishai DM, Ferris DG, Litaker MS. What is the least costly strategy to evaluate cervical abnormalities in rural women? Comparing telemedicine, local practitioners, and expert physicians. Med Decis Making 2003;23:463-70.
23. Harper DM, Moncur MM, Harper WH, Burke GC, Rasmussen CA, Mumford MC. The technical performance and clinical feasibility of telecolposcopy. J Fam Pract 2000;49:623-7.
24. Puckett CD. The educational annotation of ICD-9-CM, 5th Ed. Reno (NV): Channel Publishing Ltd.; 2003.
25. American Medical Association. Current Procedural Terminology: 2004. Chicago (IL): AMA Press; 2003.
26. Medicare Fees based on Medicare Part B Physician Fee Schedule, http://www.wpsic.com/medicare/ provider/pricing_fees.shtml. Site last visited March 28, 2005.
27. Medicaid Fees based on WI Medicaid Fee Schedule. http://dhfs.wisconsin. gov/medicaid4/maxfees/maxfee. htm#medicaid. Site last visited March 28, 2005.