Deciphering the need in housing markets: A technique to identify appropriate housing policies at the local level

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 361-378

  McClure, Kirk ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Housing affordability; Housing markets; Housing policy

Indexed keywords

AFFORDABLE HOUSING; HOUSING MARKET; HOUSING POLICY; POLICY ANALYSIS;

EID: 27844586254     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X04270126     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Apgar, William. 1990. Which housing policy is best? Housing Policy Debate 1 (1): 1-32.
2. Bogdon, Amy, Joshua Silver, and Margery Austin Turner. 1993. National analysis of housing affordability, adequacy, and availability: A framework for local housing strategies. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
3. Ernst & Young LLP, Kenneth Leventhal Real Estate Group. 1997. The low-income housing tax credit: The first decade. Boston: Ernst & Young LLP.
4. Galster, George. 1996. William Grigsby and the analysis of housing sub-markets and filtering. Urban Studies 33 (10): 1797-1805.
5. _. 1997. Comparing demand-side and supply-side housing policies: Sub-market and spatial perspectives. Housing Studies 12 (4): 561-77.
6. Galster, George, and Jerome Rothenberg. 1991. Filtering in urban housing: A graphical analysis of a quality-segmented market. Journal of Planning Education and Research 11 (1): 37-50.
7. Grigsby, William G. 1963. Housing markets and public policy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
8. Kain, John, and John Quigley. 1975. Housing markets and racial discrimination: A microeconomic analysis. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
9. Malpezzi, Stephen, and Richard K. Green. 1996. What has happened to the bottom of the US Housing Market? Urban Studies 33 (10): 1807-20.
10. McClure, Kirk. 1999. Housing vouchers versus housing production: Assessing long-term costs. Housing Policy Debate 9 (2): 355-71.
11. Millennial Housing Commission. 2002. Meeting our nation's housing challenges: Report of the Millennial Housing Commission. Washington, D.C.: Congress of the United States.
12. Nelson, Katherine P. 1994. Whose shortage of affordable housing? Housing Policy Debate 5 (4): 401-42.
13. Nelson, Katherine P., and Jill Khadduri. 1992. To whom should limited housing resources be directed? Housing Policy Debate 3 (1): 1-55.
14. Schill, Michael H., Ingrid Gould Ellen, Amy Ellen Schwartz, and Ioan Voicu. 2002. Revitalizing inner-city neighborhoods: New York City's ten-year plan. Housing Policy Debate 13 (3): 529-66.
15. Schill, Michael H., and Susan M. Wachter. 2001. Principles to guide housing policy at the beginning of the millennium. Cityscape 5 (2): 5-19.
16. Struyk, Raymond J. 1990. Comment on which housing policy is best? 1990. Housing Policy Debate 1 (1): 41-51.
17. U.S. Bureau of the Census. n.d. U.S. Bureau of the Census, http://www.census.gov.
18. U.S. Department of Commerce. (n.d.). Urban consumers, all items. In U.S. Department of Commerce, Consumer price index. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Commerce.
19. U.S. Department of Commerce and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 1995. American housing survey for the United States 1993. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 1999. The widening gap: New findings on housing affordability in America. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
21. _. 2000. Rental housing assistance - The worsening crisis: A report to Congress on worst case housing needs. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
22. _. 2003. Formula and consolidate [sic] plan special tabulation request. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
23. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1988. Home ownership: Mortgage bonds are costly and provide little assistance to those in Need. GAO/RCED-88-11. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office.
24. Urban Institute. 1995. Implementing block grants for housing: An evaluation of the first year of HOME. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
25. _. 1998. Expanding the nation's supply of affordable housing: An evaluation of the Home Investment Partnerships Program. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
26. Weicher, John. 1990. The voucher/production debate. In Building Foundations, edited by Denise DiPasquale and Langley C. Keyes, 263-92. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
27. Weicher, John, and Thomas G. Thibodeau. 1988. Filtering and housing markets. Journal of Urban Economics 23 (1): 21-40.
28. Winnick, Louis. 1995. The triumph of housing allowance programs: How fundamental policy conflict was resolved. Cityscape 1 (3): 95-121.
29. Yinger, John. 1998. Housing discrimination is still worth worrying about. Housing Policy Debate 9 (4): 893-927.