Measurement 101: Some fundamentals revisited

Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 21-28

  Frisbie, David A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Criterion referenced; Measurement instruction; Norm referenced; Reliability; Validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844585949     PISSN: 07311745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2005.00016.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
2. Feldt, L. S., & Brennan, R. L. (1989). Reliability. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.). New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
3. Glaser, R. (1963). Instructional technology and the measurement of learning outcomes. American Psychologist, 18, 519-521.
4. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.). New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
5. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Public Law No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
6. Standards and assessments peer review guidance: Information and examples for meeting requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (2004, April). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.