A conceptual model of forest stand development based on permanent sample-plot data in Estonia

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 20, Issue , 2005, Pages 94-101

  Kangur, Ahto ^a   Korjus, Henn ^a   Jõgiste, Kalev ^a   Kiviste, Andres ^a  

^a ESTONIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Forest management; Natural disturbances; Permanent plots

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEMS; SOILS; STORMS; BIODIVERSITY; NATURAL RESOURCES; SAMPLING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

PICEA ABES; TREE STEMS; UPROOTING; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; NATURAL DISTURBANCE DYNAMICS; NATURAL DISTURBANCES; PERMANENT PLOTS;

FORESTRY;

ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTRY; SOIL; BIODIVERSITY; FOREST MANAGEMENT;

EID: 27844579182     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14004080510041039     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bakker, J. P., Olff, H., Willems, J. H., and Zobel, M., 1996. Why do we need permanent plots in the study of long-term vegetation dynamics?. Journal of Vegetation Science, 7:147–155.
2. Barreñada Sanz, E., (2001). Ecosystem based management plan for Kõpu peninsula. Thesis, University of Lleida, Estonian Agricultural University
3. Bromann, F. H., and Likens, G. E., 1979. Pattern and process in a forested ecosystem, New York:Springer.
4. Brubaker, L. B., 1981. “ Long-term forest dynamics ”. In Forest succession:Concepts and application, Edited by:West, D. C., Shugart, H. H., and Botkin, D. B., 95–106. New York:Springer.
5. Frelich, L., 2002. Forest dynamics and disturbance regimes. Studies from temperate evergreen-deciduous forests, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
6. Jõgiste, K., & Väät, T., (2002). Uuenemine ja uuendamine puistu dünaamika mudelis. (Natural and artificial regeneration as an integral part of the stand dynamics model). Metsanduslikud Uurimused, XXXVII, 72–79. (In Estonian with English summary.)
7. Kangur, A., Jõgiste, K., & Korjus, H., (2004). Kõpu poolsaare riigimetsade säästev majandamine ökosüsteemide väärtushinnangute skooringmeetodi alusel. (Sustainable management of state forests in Kõpu peninsula based on ecosystem value evaluation method). Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 40, 110–123. (In Estonian with English summary.)
8. Kasesalu, H., (1993). General characterization of the Forestry Training and Experimental Centre at Järvselja and the story of formation of the virgin forest nature reserve. In H., Kasesalu (Ed.), The nature in the virgin forest in Järvselja. Yearbook of the Estonian Naturalists’ Society, 74, 7–17. (In Estonian with Russian and English summary.)
9. Kiviste, A., (1991). Puistu kasvukäigu modeleerimisest. [About the forest growth modelling]. Eesti Mets, 2, 38–44. (In Estonian.)
10. Kiviste, A., (1999a). Eesti puistute kasvumudelitest. (About the Estonian forest growth models). Pidev metsakorraldus. Transactions of the Faculty of Forestry, Estonian Agricultural University, 32, 28–36. (In Estonian with English summary.)
11. Kiviste, A., 1999b. “ Site index change in the 1950s–1999s according to Estonian forest inventory data ”. In Causes and consequences of accelerating tree growth in Europe. EFI Proceedings Edited by:Karjalainen, T., Spiecker, H., and Laroussinie, O., 87–100.
12. Kuuluvainen, T., 2002a. Disturbance dynamics in boreal forests:Defining the ecological basis of restoration and management of biodiversity. Silva Fennica, 36:5–9.
13. Kuuluvainen, T., 2002b. Natural variability of forests as a reference for restoring and managing biological diversity in boreal Fennoscandia. Silva Fennica, 36:97–125.
14. Kuuluvainen, T., Mäki, J., Karjalainen, L., and Lehtonen, H., 2002. Tree age distributions in old-growth forest sites in Vienansalo wilderness, eastern Fennoscandia. Silva Fennica, 36:169–184.
15. Laasasenaho, J., 1982. Taper curve and volume function for pine, spruce and birch. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae, 108:1–74.
16. Long, J. N., Dean, T. J., and Roberts, S. D., 2004. Linkages between silviculture and ecology:Examination of several important conceptual models. Forest Ecology and Management, 200:249–261.
17. Oliver, C. D., and Larson, B. C., 1996. Forest stand dynamics, New York:John Wiley & Sons.
18. Paal, J., (1997). Eesti taimkatte kasvukohatüüpide klassifikatsioon. (Classification of Estonian vegetation site types). Tallinn:Keskkonnaministeerium, ÜRO keskkonnaprogramm. (In Estonian.)
19. Peet, R. K., 1992. “ Community structure and ecosystem function ”. In Plant succession:Theory and prediction, Edited by:Glenn-Lewin, D. C., Peet, R. K., and Veblen, T. T., London:Chapman & Hall.
20. Rebane, H., (1969). Lehtpuule allajäänud kuuse kasvutingimustest ja kasvust hooldamisega hilinetud lehtpuu-kuuse noorendikus. (On the growth and growth conditions of Norway spruce in the young hardwood-spruce stands with too late thinnings). Metsanduslikud Uurimused, VII, 45–64. (In Estonian with Summary in German.)
21. Rouvinen, S., and Kuuluvainen, T., 2005. Tree diameter distribution in natural and managed old Pinus sylvestris-dominated forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 208:45–61.
22. Sepp, R., & Rooma, I., (1993). On soil conditions in the Järvselja forest reserve. In H., Kasesalu (Ed.), The nature in the virgin forest in Järvselja. Year-book of the Estonian Naturalists’ Society, 74, 131–207. (In Estonian with Russian and English summary.)
23. Stanturf, J. A., (2004). Disturbance dynamics of forested ecosystems. In A., Kangur (Ed.), Natural disturbances and ecosystem-based forest management. Proceedings of the International Conference, Tartu, Estonia, 27–29 May 2004. Transactions of the Faculty of Forestry, Estonian Agricultural University, 37, 7–12.
24. Vodde, F., (2002). Between wind and water. An investigation of the importance of windthrow and other disturbance types in the dry forest ecosystem on Kõpu peninsula, Estonia. Thesis, Wageningen University.
25. Vodde, F., Barreñada, E., Laumets, S., Kangur, A., and Jõgiste, K., 2002. Ecosystem management plan on the Kõpu Peninsula:Methodological considerations. Transactions of the Faculty of Forestry, Estonian Agricultural University, 35:93–100.