Boundary conditions in human movement I: Constraining constraints

Proceedings of the 3rd IASTED International Conference on Biomedical Engineering 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 629-633

  Harris, Christopher M ^a   Harwood, Mark R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^b CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Arm movements; Boundary conditions; Eye movements; Fourier analysis; Measurement noise; Minimum jerk

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; CONSTRAINT THEORY; EYE MOVEMENTS; KINEMATICS; OPTIMAL CONTROL SYSTEMS; ROBOTICS;

ARM MOVEMENTS; FOURIER ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT NOISE; MINIMUM JERK;

BIOMECHANICS;

EID: 27844545356     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. H.K. Reeve & P.W. Sherman, Optimally and phylogeny: a critique of current thought. In Adaptation and Optimality, eds. S.H.Orzack & E. Sober, 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 64-113.
2. N. Hogan, An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements, Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 1984, 2745-2754.
3. Y. Uno, M. Kawato, R. Suzuki, Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement: minimum torque-change model. Biological Cybernetics, 61, 1989, 89-101.
4. C.M. Harris & D.M. Wolpert, Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning, Nature, 394, 1998, 780-784.
5. T.J. Sejnowski, Making smooth moves. Nature, 394, 1998, 725.
6. C.M. Harris, Exploring smoothness and discontinuities in human motor behaviour with Fourier analysis, Mathematical Biosciences 188, 2004, 99-116.
7. M.R. Harwood & C.M.Harris, Boundary conditions in human movement II: The Fourier approach. (2005, this edition).