The effects of experience and data presentation format on an auditing judgment

Journal of Applied Business Research

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 53-61

  Anderson, John C ^a   Mueller, Jennifer M ^b  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844506061     PISSN: 08927626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. AICPA American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 1988. Statement of Auditing Standards No. 56, Analytical Procedures.
2. Amer, T. 1991. "An Experimental Investigation of Multi-cue Financial Information Display and Decision Making." Journal of Information Systems. (Fall): 18-34.
3. Anderson, J.C. and S. E. Kaplan. 1992. "An Investigation of the Effect of Presentation Format on Auditors' Noninvestigation Region Judgments" Advances in Accounting Information Systems. (1): 71-88.
4. Anderson, J. C. and P.M.J. Reckers. 1992. "An Empirical Investigation of the Effects of Presentation Format and Personality on Auditor's Judgment in Applying Analytical Procedures." Advances in Accounting. (10): 19-43.
5. Biggs, S.F. and J.J. Wild. 1985. "An Investigation of Auditor Judgment in Analytical Review." The Accounting Review. (October): 607-633.
6. Blocher, E. and J.J. Willingham. 1988. Analytical Review: A Guide to Performing Analytical Procedures. McGraw-Hill.
7. Chapman, L.J. 1967. "Illusory Correlation in Observational Report." Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. (6): 151-155.
8. Davis, L.R. 1989. "eport Format and the Decision Maker's Task: An Experimental Investigation." Accounting, Organizations and Society. (14): 495-508.
9. DeSanctis, G. 1984. "Computer Graphics as Decision Aids: Directions for Research." Decision Sciences. (15): 463-487.
10. DeSanctis, G. and S.L. Jarvenpaa. 1985. "An Investigation of the 'Tables versus Graphs' Controversy in a Learning Environment." Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information Systems. (Dec): 134-144.
11. Frownfelter-Lohrke, C. 1998. "The effects of differing information presentations of general-purpose financial statements on users' decisions. " Journal of Information Systems. (Fall): 99-107.
12. Goodenough, D.R. 1976. "The Role of Individual Differences in Field Dependence as a Factor in Learning and Memory." Psychological Bulletin. (83): 675-694.
13. Hirst, E. and L. Koonce. 1996. "Audit Analytical Procedures: A Field Investigation." Contemporary Accounting Research (13): 457-486.
14. Kaplan, S.E. 1988. "An Examination of the Effect of Presentation Format on Auditors' Expected Value Judgments." Accounting Horizons. (September): 90-95.
15. Lucas, H. C. 1975. "Performance and the Use of an Information System." Management Science. (8): 908-919.
16. Lucas, H.C. and N.R. Nielson. 1980. "The Impact of the Mode of Information Presentation on Learning and Performance." Management Science. (October): 982-993.
17. McArthur, L. Z. 1980. "Illusory causation and illusory correlation: Two epistemological accounts." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. (6): 507-519.
18. MacKay, D. B. and A. Villarreal. 1987. "Performance Differences in the Use of Graphic and Tabular Displays of Multivariate Data." Decision Sciences. (18): 535-546.
19. Schulz, A. and P. Booth. 1995. "The Effects of Presentation Format on the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Auditors' Analytical Review Judgments." Accounting and Finance. (May): 107-131.
20. Schroder, H.M., M.J. Driver, and S. Streufert. 1967. Human Information Processing. Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.
21. Tuttle, B. M. and R. Kershaw. 1998. "Information presentation and judgment strategy from a cognitive fit perspective." Journal of Information Systems. (Spring): 1-17.
22. Vessey, I. 1991. "Cognitive Fit: A Theory-Based Analysis of the Graphs versus Table Literature." Decision Sciences. (22): 219-240.
23. Witkin, H.A. and D.R. Goodenough. 1981. Cognitive Styles: Essence and Origins. International Universities Press.
24. Wright, W.F. 1989a. "The Usefulness of Graphics Displays for Decision Making." Advances in Social Science and Computers. (1): 129-143.
25. _. 1989b. "Graphical Displays, Professional Experience, and Financial Judgment Performance". Working paper.
26. _. 1995. "Superior Financial Judgments Given Graphical Displays." Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory (14): 144-163.