Value and unacceptable risk

Economics and Philosophy

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 177-197

  Arrhenius, Gustaf ^a   Rabinowicz, Wlodek ^b  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844503588     PISSN: 02650525     EISSN: 14716437     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0266267105000556     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Allais, M. 1953. Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: critiques de postulates et axiomes de l'école américaine, Econometrica 21:503-46
2. Broome, J. 1991. Weighing goods. Cambridge University Press
3. Fine, K., 1975. Vagueness, truth and logic. Synthese 54:235-59.
4. Reprinted in Vagueness: a reader, ed. R. Keefe and P. Smith. MIT Press, 1996:119-50
5. Hájek, A. Pascal's Wager. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2004 edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL+〈http://plato.stanford. edu/archives/spr2004/entries/pascal-wager/〉
6. Hausner, M. 1954. Multidimensional utilities. In Decision processes, ed. R. M. Thrall, C. H. Coombs, and R. L. Davis, 167-80. John Wiley
7. Keefe, R. 2000. Theories of vagueness. Cambridge University Press
8. Luce, R. D, and H. Raiffa, 1957. Games and decisions: introduction and critical survey. John Wiley
9. McClennen, E. F. 1988. Sure-thing doubts. In Decision, probability, and utility, ed. P. Gärdenfors and N.-E. Sahlin, 166-82. Cambridge University Press
10. v. Neumann, J. and O. Morgenstern. 1953. Theory of games and economic behavior, 2nd edn. John Wiley
11. Resnik, M. D. 1987. Choices: an introduction to decision theory, University of Minnesota Press
12. Samuelson, P. A. 1952. Probability, utility and the independence axiom, Econometrica 20:670-8
13. Temkin, L. 1987. Intransitivity and the mere addition paradox. Philosophy and Public Affairs 16:138-87
14. Temkin, L. 1996. A continuum argument for intransitivity. Philosophy and Public Affairs 25:175-210
15. Temkin, L. 1999. Intransitivity and the person-affecting principle: a response. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59:777-84
16. Temkin, L. 2000. An abortion argument and the threat of intransitivity. In Well-being and morality: essays in honour of James Griffin, ed. R. Crisp and B. Hooker, 336-56. Oxford University Press
17. Temkin, L. 2001.Worries about continuity, expected utility theory, and practical reasoning. In exploring practical philosophy: from action to values, ed. D. Egonsson, J. Josefsson, B. Petersson, and T. Rønnow-Rasmusen, 95-108. Ashgate Publishers
18. Vallentyne, P. 1993. The connection between prudential and moral goodness. Journal of Social Philosophy 24:105-28