Detailed comparison of downflows seen both in EIT 30.4 nm and Big Bear Hα movies

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Volumn 443, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 319-328

  De Groof, A ^a   Bastiaensen, C ^a   Muller D A N ^b,c   Berghmans, D ^d   Poedts, S ^a  

^a CENTRE FOR PLASMA ASTROPHYSICS   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER   (United States)

^d ROYAL OBSERVATORY OF BELGIUM   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Sun: activity; Sun: atmosphere

Indexed keywords

ASTROPHYSICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COOLING; PLASMAS; SATELLITE OBSERVATORIES; SOLAR ENERGY;

INTENSITY VARIATIONS; OFF-DISK LOOP-LIKE STRUCTURE; SUN: ACTIVITY; SUN: ATMOSPHERE;

IMAGE ANALYSIS;

EID: 27844495761     PISSN: 00046361     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053129     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Antiochos, S. K., MacNeice, P. J., & Spicer, D. S. 2000, ApJ, 536, 494
2. Aschwanden, M. J., Fletcher, L., Schrijver, C. J., & Alexander, D. 1999, ApJ, 520, 880
3. Bai, Z., Demmel, J., Dongarra, J., Ruhe, A., & van der Vorst, H. 2000, Templates for the Solution of Algebraic Eigenvalue Problems: a Practical Guide, Siam, Philadelphia
4. Berghmans, D. 1998, Data Preprocessing. Understanding the contaminations in the shutterless mode of EIT, Tech. Rep., Royal Observatory Belgium, sol.oma.be/High-cadence/data-preprocessing/index.html
5. Clette, F. 2000, High-cadence synoptic program of the Extreme-ultraviolet Imaging Telescope, Tech. Rep., Royal Observatory Belgium, sol.oma.be/High- cadence/
6. Criminisi, A., Reid, I., & Zisserman, A. 1999, Image and Vision Computing (IVC), 17, 625
7. De Groof, A., Berghmans, D., Van Driel-Gesztelyi, L., & Poedts, S. 2004, A&A, 415, 1141
8. De Moortel, I., Hood, A., Ireland, J., & Walsh, R. 2002a, Sol. Phys., 209, 89
9. De Moortel, I., Ireland, J., Walsh, R., & Hood, A. 2002b, Sol. Phys., 209, 61
10. Delaboudinière, J.-P., Artzner, G. E., Brunaud, J., et al. 1995, Sol. Phys., 162, 291
11. Delone, A., Makarova, E., Porfiréva, G., Roschina, E., & Yukinina, G. 1989, Hvar Observatory Bulletin, 13, 157
12. Denker, C., Johannesson, A., Marquette, W., et al. 1999, Sol. Phys., 184, 87
13. Engvold, O., Jensen, E., & Andersen, B. N. 1979, Sol. Phys., 62, 331
14. Golub, G. H., & Loan, C. F. V. 1996, Matrix Computations (Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press)
15. Heinzel, P., & Rompolt, B. 1987, Sol. Phys., 110, 171
16. Heinzel, P., Schmieder, B., & Mein, P. 1992, Sol. Phys., 139, 81
17. Labrosse, N., & Gouttebroze, P. 2001, A&A, 380, 323
18. Loughhead, R. E., & Bray, R. J. 1984, ApJ, 283, 392
19. Müller, D. A. N., Hansteen, V. H., & Peter, H. 2003, A&A, 411, 605
20. Müller, D. A. N., Peter, H., & Hansteen, V. H. 2004, A&A, 424, 289
21. Müller, D. A. N., De Groof, A., Hansteen, V. H., & Peter, H. 2005, A&A, 436, 1067
22. Mundy, J., & Zisserman, A. 1992, Geometric Invariance in Computer Vision (MIT Press)
23. Roberts, B. R. 2000, Sol. Phys., 193, 139
24. Schrijver, C. J. 2001, Sol. Phys., 198, 325
25. Semple, J., & Kneebone, G. 1979, Algebraic Projective Geometry (Oxford University Press)
26. Wiik, J. E., Schmieder, B., Heinzel, P., & Roudier, T. 1996, Sol. Phys., 166, 89