Mastery Learning and Contemporary Issues in Education

Action in Teacher Education

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 32-42

  Motamedi, Vahid ^a   Sumrall, William J ^a  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844464372     PISSN: 01626620     EISSN: 21586098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01626620.2000.10462991     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Anderson, L. W., 1976. An empirical investigation of individual differences in time to learn. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68: 226–233.
2. Arlin, M., 1984. Time variability in mastery learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21: 103–120.
3. Arredondo, D., and Block, J., 1990. Recognizing the connections between thinking skills and mastery learning. Educational Leadership, 47 (5): 4–10.
4. Beckwith, D., 1993. Creative group problem-solving: An innovative computer application to facilitate learning and retention of difficult scientific principles. Collegiate Microcomputer, 11 (2): 70–74.
5. Block, J. H., ed. 1971. Mastery learning: Theory and practice, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
6. Block, J. H., 1973. Teachers teaching, and mastery learning. Today's Education, 62: 30–37.
7. Block, J. H., 1979. Mastery learning - Current state of the craft. Educational Leadership, 37: 114–117.
8. Block, J. H., and Anderson, L. W., 1975. Mastery learning in classroom instruction, New York: Macmillon.
9. Bloom, B., 1968. Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment, 1 (2): 1–5.
10. Bloom, B. S., 1974. Implications of the IEA studies for curriculum and instruction. School Review, 82: 413–435.
11. Bloom, B. S., 1976. Human characteristics and school learning, New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Bloom, B. S., 1979. A conversation with Benjamin Bloom. Interview by Ron Braandt. Educational Leadership, 39: 157–161.
13. Bloom, B. S., 1980. The new direction in educational research: Alterable variables. Phi Delta Kappan, 62: 382–385.
14. Carroll, J. B., 1963. A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64 (8): 723–733.
15. Christie, N., and Sabers, D. L., Using microcomputers to implement mastery learning with high-risk and minority adolescents. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. March30-April 21989, San Francisco, CA.
16. Clements, D. H., and Battista, M. T., 1990. Constructivist learning and teaching. Arithmetic Teacher, 38 (1): 34–35.
17. Dunkleberger, G. E., and Heikkinen, H. E., 1983. Computer-made tests set mastery learning free. Curriculum Review, 22: 34–35.
18. Fosnot, C. T., 1996. “ Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning ”. In Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice, Edited by: Fosnot, C. T., 8–33. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Glass, G. V., and Smith, M. L., 1978. The technology and politics of standards. Educational Technology, 18: 12–18.
20. Guskey, T. R., 1985. Implementing mastery learning, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
21. Guskey, T. R., 1990. Cooperative mastery learning strategies. The Elementary School Journal, 91 (1): 33–42.
22. Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, R. T., 1994. Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning, 4th ed., Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
23. Julyan, C., and Duckworth, E., 1996. “ A constructivist perspective on teaching and learning science ”. In Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice, Edited by: Fosnot, C. T., 55–72. New York: Teachers College Press.
24. Mevarech, Z. R., 1985. The effects of cooperative mastery learning strategies on mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 78 (6): 372–377.
25. Mevarech, Z. R., and Susak, Z., 1993. Effects of learning with cooperative-mastery method on elementary students. The Journal of Educational Research, 86 (4): 197–205.
26. Milkent, M. M., Going for mastery with aid of computers. Paper presented at the National Science Teachers Association Area Convention. Las Vegas, NV.
27. Milkent, M. M., and Roth, W. M., 1989. Enhancing student achievement through computer-generated homework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26: 567–573.
28. Montazemi, A. R., and Wang, F., 1995. An empirical investigation of CBI in support of mastery learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13 (2): 185–205.
29. Morrison, H. C., 1926. The practice of teaching in the secondary school, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30. Oakes, J., 1985. Keeping track: How schools structure inequality, New Haven: Yale University Press.
31. Patterson, W., 1993. Moving toward mastery learning: One school's approach. NASSP Bulletin, 77: 96–99.
32. Perko, F. M., Mastery learning in historical perspective. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
33. Ritchie, G., and Carr, K., 1992. A constructivist critique of mastery learning in mathematics. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 27 (2): 191–201.
34. Ritchie, D., and Thorkildsen, R., 1994. Effects of accountability on students' achievement in mastery learning. Journal of Educational Research, 88 (2): 86–90.
35. Slavin, R. E., 1987. Mastery learning reconsidered. Review of Educational Research, 57: 175–213.
36. Slavin, R. E., and Karweit, N. L., 1984. Mastery learning and student teams: A factorial experiment in urban general mathematics classes. American Educational Research Journal, 21 (4): 725–736.
37. Vockell, E. L., and Mihail, T., 1993. Instructional principles behind computerized instruction for students with exceptionalities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 25 (3): 38–43.
38. Walberg, H. J., 1984. Improving the productivity of America's schools. Educational Leadership, 41: 19–27.
39. Walberg, H. J., 1985. “ Examining the theory, practice, and outcomes of mastery learning ”. In Improving student achievement through mastery learning program, Edited by: Levine, D. U., 1–10. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40. Washburne, C. W., 1922. Educational measurements as a key to individualizing instruction and promotions. Journal of Educational Research, 5: 195–206.
41. Wentling, T. L., 1973. Mastery versus non-mastery instruction with varying test item feedback treatments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65: 50–58.