Determining the quality of youth-adult relationships within community-based youth programs

Journal of Extension

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2005, Pages

  Jones, Kenneth R ^a   Perkins, Daniel F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844463224     PISSN: 10775315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York: Doubleday Books.
2. Benson, P. L. (1997). All kids are our kids: What communities must do to raise caring and responsible children and adolescents. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3. Brewer, M. B. & Miller, N. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Eds.). Groups in Contact: The Psychology of Desegregation. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
4. Camino, L. (2002). CO-SAMM:A tool to assess youth leadership. CYD Journal, 3, 39-43.
5. Dubois, D. L., Holloway, B. E., Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2002, April). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 157-197.
6. Dubois, D. L., & Neville, H. A. (1997). Youth mentoring: Investigation of relationship characteristics and perceived benefits. Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 227-234.
7. Flanagan, C. A. & Faison, N. (2001). Youth civic development: Implications of research for social policy and programs. Social Policy Report, 15(1). A report of the Society for Research in Child Development. Retrieved April 25, 2005 from http://www.srcd.org/sprv15n1.pdf
8. Gilliam, F. D., Jr. & Bales, S. N. (2001, July). Strategic frame analysis: Reframing America's youth. Social Policy Report, 15(3). A report of the Society for Research in Child Development. Retrieved April 25, 2005 from http://www.srcd.org/sprv15n3.pdf
9. Grossman, J. B., & Johnson, A. (1999, June). Assessing the effectiveness of mentoring programs. In Contemporary issues in mentoring. (J.B. Grossman, ed.). Public/Private Ventures. Retrieved April 25, 2005 from http://www.ppv.org/pdffiles/cimentoring/cim_3.pdf
10. Harman, H.H. (1976). Modern factor analysis (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11. Hart, R.A. (1997). Children's participation: The theory and practice of involving young citizens in community development and environmental care. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
12. Hart, R. A. (1992). Children's participation: From tokenism to citizenship. Florence, Italy:UNICEF/International Child Development Center.
13. Herrera, C., Sipe, C.L., McClanahan, W. S., Arbreton, A. J. A., & Pepper, S. K. (2000, April). Mentoring school-age children: Relationship development in community-based and school-based programs. Public Private Ventures. Retrieved April 25, 2005 from http://www.ppv.org/pdffiles/ mentorreldevel.pdf
14. Israel, G. D., & Ilvento, T. W. (1995, April). Everybody wins: Involving youth in community needs assessment. Journal of Extension [On-line], 33 (2). Available at: http://www.joe.org/joe/1995april/a1.html
15. Jekielek, S. M., Moore, K. A., Hair, E. C., & Scarupa, H. J. (2002, February). Mentoring: A promising strategy for youth development (research brief).Washington, DC: Child Trends.
16. Jones, K. R. (2004). An Assessment of perceptions and experiences in community-based youth-adult relationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
17. Jones, K. R., & Perkins, D. F. (2004). Youth-adult partnerships. Chapter to appear in: C. B. Fisher & R. M. Lerner (In preparation). Applied developmental science: An encyclopedia of research, policies, and programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Kachigan, S. K. (1986). Statistical analysis: An interdisciplinary introduction to univariate and multivariate methods. New York, NY: Radius Press.
19. Mayo, M. (2000, April). Learning for active citizenship: Training for and learning from participation in area regeneration. Studies in the Education of Adults, 32, 22-35.
20. Mitra, D. (2000). Making reform real: Involving youth in school change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
21. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (1998). JUMP: Juvenile mentoring program, 1998 Report to Congress, Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/952872.pdf
22. Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, pp. 65-85.
23. Rhodes, J. E. (2002). Stand by me: The risks and rewards of mentoring today's youth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. th Ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace & Company.
25. Villarruel, F. A., Perkins, D. F., Borden, L. M., & Keith, J. G. (2003). Community youth development: Practice, policy and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Yohalem, N. (2002). Defining, assessing, and improving youth program quality: Where Are we and where do we need to go? A summary of youth program assessment Tools. Washington, DC: The Forum for Youth Investment. Retrieved April 25, 2005 from http://www. forumforyouthinvestment.org/youthprogqualpremtg. htm
27. Zeldin, S., Day, T., & Matysik, G. (n.d.). Program and activity assessment tool. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Extension. Retrieved April 25, 2005 from http://www.uwex.edu/ces/4h/paat/
28. Zeldin, S., McDaniel, A., Topitzes, D., & Calvert, M. (2000). Youth in decision-making: A study on the impact of youth on adults and organizations. A report developed by the University of Wisconsin-Madison and the Innovation Center for Community and Youth Development, Chevy Chase, MD.