Some lessons learned from the development and updating processes of the probabilistic safety assessments of Daya Bay nuclear power plant

Progress in Nuclear Energy

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 85-90

  Jiejuan, Tong ^a   Xuhong, He ^a  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Daya Bay NPP; Probabilistic safety assessment (PSA); PSA quality

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; DECISION MAKING; PROBABILITY; PROCESS CONTROL;

DAYA BAY NPP; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; PSA QUALITY;

NUCLEAR ENERGY;

EID: 27844433567     PISSN: 01491970     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2005.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. ASME, 2002. Standard for Probabilistic Risk Assessment for Nuclear Power Plant Applications, Rev. 2002.
2. GPSA group, 1990. Guangdong Nuclear Power Station Probabilistic Safety Assessment.
3. GNPJVC PSA group, 2000. Guangdong Daya Bay Nuclear Power Plant Probabilistic Safety Assessment.
4. INET and CAEA, 1997. Guangdong Daya Bay Nuclear Power Plant Probabilistic Safety Assessment.
5. NEI, 2000. Industry PRA Peer Review Process Guidelines, NEI-00-02.
6. NNSA, 2001. The first batch of review Comments for the Guangdong Daya Bay Nuclear Power Plant Probabilistic Safety Assessment report.
7. USNRC, 2002. Guidance on the Use of PRA Standards and Industry Programs in Evaluating the Technical Adequacy of PRA Results for Risk-Informed Activities, DG-1122.